HMM: Scientists Alleging Possible HIV Strains in Coronavirus Retract Study After Establishment Pressure

Shane Trejo   |  

Feb 3, 2020

• Share on Gab
• Share on Parler
• Share on Gettr
• Share on Facebook
• Share on Twitter
• Share on LinkedIn
• Share on Flipboard
• Share on Telegram
• Share via Email

The situation surrounding the coronavirus pandemic is getting weirder and weirder as the establishment grows more desperate to control the narrative and suppress alternative reporting regarding the health scare.

Indian scientists at Biorxiv published findings last week that indicated HIV strains were found in the coronavirus that originated in Wuhan, China and is now spreading throughout the world. This immediately caused a stir as the information spread, with social media desperately trying to prevent the study from being widely disseminated.

Harvard public health scientist Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding announced on Sunday that these scientists formally retracted their study amidst the establishment-led backlash. He also deleted the posts on his Twitter in which he discussed the study.

“This is why it is important to never rush to conclusions and judgement on pre-print articles that aren’t peer reviewed. Even peer reviewed papers are sometimes flawed too, but hence why the need for replication of work by others to further confirm/refute. Normally all this s done in the realm of universities and academic conferences. But with such a fast moving [coronavirus] the normal pace of science is suddenly upturned and the public thirst for information… outpaces the time to properly vet all studies,” Dr. Feigl-Ding added in subsequent tweets.

While Dr. Feigl-Ding is willing to accept that the science was bogus, there may be a more sinister agenda at play here in which the findings are being covered up in order to promote the official narrative. The fake news media, after all, has a stake in covering up corporate or government malfeasance.

Popular alternative media website ZeroHedge was thrown off of Twitter when their reporting about the controversial study started to go viral.

https://twitter.com/getongab/status/1223391919331586048

The Director-General of the World Health Organization, an organ of the corrupt globalist United Nations, thanked social media providers for censoring unapproved news about coronavirus on their platforms.

Big League Politics has reported on a news item that the establishment is particularly invested in keeping suppressed. The city of Wuhan, China opened a controversial research center for scientists to study deadly pathogens just two years ago:

A laboratory in Wuhan is on the cusp of being cleared to work with the world’s most dangerous pathogens. The move is part of a plan to build between five and seven biosafety level-4 (BSL-4) labs across the Chinese mainland by 2025, and has generated much excitement, as well as some concerns.

Some scientists outside China worry about pathogens escaping, and the addition of a biological dimension to geopolitical tensions between China and other nations. But Chinese microbiologists are celebrating their entrance to the elite cadre empowered to wrestle with the world’s greatest biological threats.

“It will offer more opportunities for Chinese researchers, and our contribution on the BSL‑4-level pathogens will benefit the world,” says George Gao, director of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology in Beijing. There are already two BSL-4 labs in Taiwan, but the National Bio-safety Laboratory, Wuhan, would be the first on the Chinese mainland…

Many staff from the Wuhan lab have been training at a BSL-4 lab in Lyon, which some scientists find reassuring. And the facility has already carried out a test-run using a low-risk virus.

But worries surround the Chinese lab, too. The SARS virus has escaped from high-level containment facilities in Beijing multiple times, notes Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey. Tim Trevan, founder of CHROME Biosafety and Biosecurity Consulting in Damascus, Maryland, says that an open culture is important to keeping BSL-4 labs safe, and he questions how easy this will be in China, where society emphasizes hierarchy. “Diversity of viewpoint, flat structures where everyone feels free to speak up and openness of information are important,” he says.

Yuan says that he has worked to address this issue with staff. “We tell them the most important thing is that they report what they have or haven’t done,” he says. And the lab’s inter­national collaborations will increase openness. “Transparency is the basis of the lab,” he adds.

We may not know exactly what the globalist establishment is desperate to hide about the coronavirus outbreak until its too late.

YOU VOTE: Should sanctuary cities lose federal funding for refusing to cooperate with immigration enforcement? *

• Yes – They are breaking the law and should face consequences.
• No – Cities should have the right to set their own policies.
• Only if they repeatedly ignore ICE detainer requests.
• I don’t know enough about sanctuary cities.

Email *

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You may opt out at any time.

Vote To See Results