On July 22, 2020, the House passed legislation to take down statues of individuals who served in the Confederacy or allegedly defended slavery.
The legislation was passed by a 305-113 vote. All of the “no” votes came from GOP elected officials, while 72 Republicans voted to take down the statues.
“Just imagine what it feels like as an African American to know that my ancestors built the Capitol, but yet there are monuments to the very people that enslaved my ancestors,” congresswoman Karen Bass, the leader of the Congressional Black Caucus, commented before the vote took place.
The vote was bipartisan but did divide Republicans. More than half voted against the legislation. Leading House Republicans such as Kevin McCarthy and Steve Scalise supported the bill, while congresswoman Liz Cheney voted against the bill.
Leftists have long clamored for the removal of Confederate monuments. “Let’s continue to correct the division that exists today, not just on this floor, but in this country. And if we can stand together in this instance, we can surely stand together and make this country, at a time in places of civil unrest, a better place for every single American,” remarked Congressman Rodney Davis, the leading Republican on the House Administration Committee who emphasized how he represents Abraham Lincoln’s home district.
The legislation mandated the removal of the 11 Confederate statues in the Capitol complex that make up the National Statuary Hall collection.
The bill that was passed on July 22 would order the removal of Confederate statues from public display. From there, they would either be donated to the Smithsonian or returned to the states that offered them to the National Statuary Hall Collection.
The legislation would also carry out the replacement of a bust of the former Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney. The former Supreme Court Chief Justice became infamous for authoring the 1857 Dred Scott ruling. His bust was replaced with the one of Thurgood Marshall, America’s first African American Supreme Court justice.
The Hill reported on other monument removals contained in this bill:
In addition, the bill instructs the Joint Committee on the Library, which oversees the placement of artwork in the Capitol, to remove specific depictions of other figures with histories of advocating for white supremacy: Charles Aycock, who served as North Carolina governor; John C. Calhoun, the former vice president and member of Congress; James Paul Clarke, a former senator and governor of Arkansas; and John Breckinridge, the former vice president and senator from Kentucky who was expelled from the Senate after joining the Confederate army.
Although elected officials lack the power to unilaterally take down the statues, they can still decide where to place them in the Capitol.
The Hill highlighted some of Nancy Pelosi’s efforts to rearrange monuments:
During her first stint as Speaker, Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) moved a statue from Virginia of Robert E. Lee, the Confederate army commander, from a prominent place steps from the Capitol rotunda to a floor below in a room known as the Crypt.
But Pelosi hasn’t stopped with her desire to tamper with American history:
Pelosi has since taken further action to rid the Capitol of artwork honoring people who served the Confederacy. Last month, she ordered the removal of four portraits displayed outside the House chamber of former Speakers who held high-ranking leadership positions in the Confederacy or enlisted in its army.
Indeed, the radical Left has been denied the ability to fully see its radical vision of historical destruction through.
However, they’ll take whatever they can get. The Right cannot afford to lose these battles of the Culture War.
The Left has simply dominated for too long.
Thanks to Spineless, Establishment Republicans, Senate Panel Delays Vote to Subpoena Big Tech CEOs
Republicans Continue to Show Pathetic They are on the Issues that Matter Most
America First nationalist’s hopes of having Big Tech CEOs testify before Congress about allegations of censorship directed towards the Right were temporarily dashed on October 19, 2020.
Politico reported that the Senate Judiciary Committee delayed plans to vote on subpoenas to force the CEOs of Twitter and Facebook to go before the Senate and be questioned about their anti-Right wing censorship policies.
Some Republicans ended up having cold feet and decided to postpone the vote much to the disappointment of right wing activists who have complained about Big Tech’s anti-free speech policies.
President Donald Trump and a number of nationalist Republicans have sharply criticized Facebook and Twitter over their censorship of a controversial New York Post report that exposed Hunter Biden, Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden’s son, and his corrupt behavior.
Originally, GOP officials in the Judiciary Committee announced plans to hold a markup on October 20 to determine if they would subpoena Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to get his perspective on allegations concerning his company’s policies that muzzle conservative viewpoints. Twitter denies claims regarding Twitter’s censorship policies.
South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, who is the Chair of the Judiciary Committee, revealed that the planned vote would also call on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to testify.
The panel stated on October 19 that it would determine whether they would issue subpoenas during a executive session on October 22 where it will also allegedly approve Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett. The committee declared in a statement that it will maintain negotiations with the companies “to allow for voluntary testimony” by the CEO. However, if an agreement cannot be reached, the panel will proceed to take a vote on the subpoenas “at a date to be determined.”
The subpoenas would compel the tech big wigs to testify on the reports of “suppression and/or censorship” of New York Post stories and on “any other content moderation policies, practices, or actions that may interfere with or influence elections for federal office,” according to a committee document released on October 19.
Texas Senator Ted Cruz, who is the chair of the Judiciary’s Subcommittee on the Constitution said to reporters that he’s expecting the committee to preside over testimonies from the Twitter and Facebook chiefs “shortly” regardless of whether they come to the decision on their own volition.
“One way or another, either voluntarily or pursuant to subpoena, they will testify and they will testify before the election,” Cruz stated.
In a separate hearing for the Senate Commerce Committee, Zuckerberg and Dorsey will join Google CEO Sundar Pichai on October 28 for a hearing on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which generally shields Big Tech companies from a liability.
Cruz, who is a member of both Judiciary and Commerce committees, wants each panel to carry out their own hearings with the tech chiefs before election day. “I believe we need a separate hearing in Judiciary because the issues being discussed in the two committees are different,” Cruz remarked.
Big Tech has become too powerful, especially during a time when social media has become the de facto public square. Republicans will need to get serious about making online speech receive the same treatment as general political speech.
Crime3 days ago
North Carolina Police Officer Viciously Beaten as Onlookers Laugh, Film for 11 Minutes
Violent Left3 days ago
Conservative Activist Brutally Beaten by Leftist, BLM Militants At Supreme Court
Violent Left2 days ago
Left-Wing Terrorists Leave Ominous Notes on Homes Promising Destruction if President Trump Wins Re-Election
States3 days ago
HUGE: Phoenix, AZ Trump Parade Stretches 30 Miles, 1500 Vehicles
Crime4 days ago
Authorities Identify Suspect in Maryland 7-11 Shooting of Mother of 4
Tech2 days ago
Google Engineer Admits to Company’s Political Censorship, Election Interference in New Project Veritas Sting #ExposeGoogle
Campaign 20203 days ago
THE FIX IS IN: Presidential Debate Committee Scraps Foreign Policy Questions after Hunter Biden Scandal
Culture3 days ago
New York Times Confirms the ‘Great Replacement’ is No Conspiracy Theory in Anti-Trump Op/ed