Twitter has cited its “Hacked Materials Policy” to justify a wide-ranging and unprecedented censorship campaign against the New York Post’s report on Hunter Biden’s organization of a meeting between Burisma executives and Vice President Biden. But its own policy does not apply, as the materials published in the story were not hacked.
The Post included an invoice that Biden had signed upon handing over his Mac to the computer repair contractor, including his signature.
The New York Post went on to obtain email communications from the Macbook in which Hunter Biden organized a meeting between his father- then-Vice President Joe Biden- and senior executives at Burisma, the oligarch-owned Ukrainian oil company for which the younger Biden had secured a lucrative position at despite having no experience in the energy industry.
Under the terms of the contract Biden signed with a Delaware computer repair man, he legally agreed to forfeit the water-damaged laptop after 90 days of repair completion if he didn’t pay for the services rendered and take back possession of the device. The younger Biden did not recover his laptop, thus surrendering the device to the store owner under the conditions of his agreement.
The FBI ultimately issued a subpoena to recover the laptop, but by the time it had, the computer repair shop owner had created a hard drive of the device’s contents, which include video of the younger Biden engaging in sexual acts, smoking crack, and engaging in suspicious dealings under the terms of his employment with Burisma. Joe Biden had previously denied that he ever met with any Burisma executives in connection with his son’s employment with the company, a statement that email communications between Hunter Biden and a Burisma executive contradicts.
Twitter is lying when they claim the materials released from the Biden laptop were “hacked.”
By falsely claiming the records were hacked, rather than the legal property of the repair shop following payment default by Hunter Biden, Twitter is itself deliberately spreading false information to justify its illegal election interference. https://t.co/MFBSqWq3oT
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) October 14, 2020
Twitter has now committed felony campaign finance violations, offering in-kind contributions to the Biden campaign while censoring information embarrassing to the Democratic candidate.
PewDiePie Supposedly Shadowbanned by YouTube, Fans Say Hundreds of Videos Didn’t Appear in Search Results
YouTube issued a denial, but not many are buying it.
Google-owned YouTube recently shadowbanned PewDiePie, according to his fans. If true, it would represent the latest act of censorship by a Big Tech company.
PewDiePie, for those who are unfamiliar, hosts YouTube’s second-largest channel. He has accumulated over 107 million subscribers in his ten years on the platform. He is extraordinarily popular but also receives flak from some quarters because he can be politically incorrect at times.
YouTube addressed the allegation that they shadowbanned PewDiePie in a tweet today:
— TeamYouTube (@TeamYouTube) October 22, 2020
The denial naturally did not convince PewDiePie’s fans, many of whom said that they weren’t receiving notifications of his new videos and couldn’t find hundreds of previous videos after using the search function:
— KEEM 🍿 (@KEEMSTAR) October 22, 2020
The issue seemed to be resolved as of Friday. Still, how many times do we have to go through this with Big Tech platforms like YouTube and Twitter and Facebook? The cycle is utterly predictable: massive account shadowbanned or suspended, platform denies any blatant censorship, account privileges restored.
PewDiePie’s real name is Felix Kjellberg. Big League Politics last posted about him when he announced a $50,000 donation to the anti-free speech Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and then again when he rescinded it:
“Usually when I pick a charity, I take my time, I find a charity that I’m really excited about and actually passionate to donate to, so when I uploaded the video talking about the charity, it was very brief, and people could tell something was off,” PewDiePie explained while laughing.
“To be fair, I saw it as an opportunity to put an end to these alt-right claims that have been thrown against me. It wasn’t to try and clear my name or save grace. If it was, I would have done it years ago, but after the Christchurch tragedy, I felt a responsibility to do something about it because it’s no longer just about me. It affected other people in a way, and I’m not okay with that,” PewDiePie said explaining his motives.
PewDiePie said that he announced the ADL donation with noble intentions, but the backlash from his fans helped him to see the error of his ways.
“I’ve struggled to figure out how to do that, but this was not the right way to go about it,” PewDiePie said. “I knew it wasn’t perfect, but I also didn’t know a lot of things that surfaced throughout this whole thing about the charity that doesn’t fit at all, so I understand why people had concerns about it, and these are things that I would have known myself if I had just taken my time.”
Campaign 20203 days ago
#DETROITLEAKS — Instructor Tells Poll Workers to Lie to Voters and Destroy Their Ballots
The Swamp4 days ago
SHOCK CLAIM: Rudy Giuliani Says Hunter Biden Laptop Had Pictures of “Underage Girls,” Bizarre Texts
Campaign 20204 days ago
Soros-Connected ‘Election Integrity Partnership’ Protects Color Revolution Agenda to Oust President Trump
Big League Guns3 days ago
New Group of Turncoat Gun Owners is Being Launched to Push for Civilian Disarmament
Campaign 20203 days ago
FREUDIAN SLIP? Husband of Kamala Harris Proclaims He is ‘Married to the Next President of the United States’
Violent Left2 days ago
Trump-Supporting Farmer’s Two Semis, Tractor, and Combine Burnt to a Crisp
Top Story3 days ago
Daughter of Man Involved in Fatal 1972 Biden Car Crash Accuses Joe Biden of Falsely Accusing Dad of Driving Drunk
Big League Guns3 days ago
Democrats Are Ready to Trash the Second Amendment