News
ICE Expects a Rise in Fake Families Arriving at the Border
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement are warning Americans of an uptick in “fake families” showing up at the border.
In other words, illegal aliens are entering America by using children posing as family members to take advantage of U.S. migration laws.
In April, ICE has conducted about 100 investigations and uncovered more than 25 cases of suspected family fraud. In the past two weeks, immigration officials have sent out six new teams of law enforcement at the U.S. Southern Border.
Trending: More Americans Now Identify as Republicans Than They Do As Democrats
The acting ICE Director Matthew Albence announced that he deployed teams at the border to catch “fake families using forged documents” as a means of gaming the U.S. immigration system. The acting ICE Director contends that this number of investigations being launched by ICE is proof that this move is paying off.
According to the Washington Times, Albence said “ICE, along with our partners at CBP, remain committed to protecting children by ensuring they are not used as pawns by individuals attempting to gain entry to the U.S. through fraud.”
The Washington Times also reported that adults who arrive at the border accompanied with children are expected to be detained for 20 days or less according to a policy imposed by a federal judge in 2015.
This timeframe is not enough for immigration officials to hear their immigration cases, so the families are released. This often results in them not showing up for their deportation cases, and as a result, many go off into the interior.
Immigration is the number #1 issue for GOP voters according to BLP reports, especially when considering the record number of illegal migrants crossing the border.
The overwhelming number of migrants crossing in undetected is putting the country’s social cohesiveness on the line. One needn’t look further at Europe, to see what can happen to a country’s social fabric when mass migration takes hold.
Numerous southern border states such as New Mexico and Texas have their hands full as America’s infrastructure is being put to the test.
The topic of immigration will simply not go away by 2020 as the border crossings are expected to grow throughout the rest of the year.
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
Have a hot tip for Big League Politics?
Got a hot news tip for us? Photos or video of a breaking story? Send your tips, photos and videos to tips@bigleaguepolitics.com. All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff.
Have something to say? Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions@bigleaguepolitics.com.
Is Bernie Sanders the anti-war candidate that many non-interventionists are making him out to be?
Journalists Jacob Crosse and Barry Grey presented some interesting observations about Sanders’ foreign policy views.
Sanders criticized the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Suleimani in January and also stressed his opposition to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
During the Iowa presidential debate, Sanders loudly boasted, “I not only voted against that war, I helped lead the effort against that war.”
However, Sanders changed his tune when chatting with the New York Times.
The answers the Sanders campaign gave the Times showed its flexibility when it comes to foreign policy.
In other words, the Sanders campaign signaled to the military and intelligence apparatus that Sanders won’t present a threat to their interests and may actually carry out their interventionist agenda.
One question in the survey that the Times sent the Sanders campaign stuck out above the rest.
The third survey question asked, “Would you consider military force to pre-empt an Iranian or North Korean nuclear or missile test?”
The Sanders campaign responded, “Yes.”
Based on this response, Sanders’ is signaling that he’s willing to continue Bush-era policies of “preemptive war.”
Like Obama, Sanders’ opposition to the Iraq War was a matter of politics rather than a principled opposition to regime change wars.
His campaign was also asked, “Would you consider military force for a humanitarian intervention?”
Sanders responded, “Yes.”
Some of the wars that the U.S. carried out in the name of “human rights” have been the Bosnian war and the bombing of Serbia in the 1990s along with the aerial campaign against Libya in 2011 and the Civil War launched in Syria.
All in all, Sanders’ pro-peace/non-interventionist image is at best window dressing.
Under a Sanders presidency, the interventionist status quo will likely stay in place.
-
News4 days agoBernie Sanders 2020 ‘Win’ in NH Netted a LOSS OF 80,000 VOTES from 2016
-
News4 days agoVirginia State Police are Silent About Door-to-Door Enforcement of Suppressor Ban
-
Violent Left3 days agoNew Mexico Bureaucrat Arrested for Vandalizing State GOP Headquarters
-
News3 days agoMS-13 Thug Gets Life Sentence in Virginia for Rape and Abduction
-
Tech4 days agoMore Censorship: Controversial Right-Wing YouTuber Nick Fuentes is Booted From Platform, Even Ben Shapiro Says It’s Too Far
-
Violent Left4 days agoNew Hampshire Thug Arrested After Assaulting ‘MAGA’ Hat-Wearing 15-Year Old at Polling Site
-
Deep State4 days agoBill Barr Pushes Back Against Trump, Criticizes President’s Comments on Stone, Drops Case Against McCabe
-
Culture3 days agoHow Vulture Capitalists Use Their Ill-Gotten Gains to Push Transgenderism Onto Children
-
Violent Left4 days agoWife of ‘Proud Boys’ Member Imprisoned for Self-Defense Pleads for Help for Their Three Children
-
The Swamp2 days agoSWAMP: FBI Press Officer Accepted Baseball Tickets From CNN Reporter
-
News4 days agoGUILTY: Creepy Porn Lawyer Michael Avenatti Convicted in Extortion Trial
-
Politics4 days agoMIT Warns That Voting App Used in Several States is Vulnerable for Hackers to ‘Alter, Stop or Expose’ Votes
