Connect with us

Campaign 2020

In Her Own Words: Kamala Harris Endorses Harsh Penalties for Non-Violent Offenders

Turns out Harris’ record is as anti-progressive as Joe Biden’s.

Published

on

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-NY) is attempting to reinvent herself as a progressive after spending years as a tough-on-crime prosecutor who reveled in throwing minorities in jail for non-violent offenses.

Harris wrote “Smart on Crime” in 2009 where she re-affirmed her commitment to punishing non-violent crimes, indicating that she has not learned any lessons from the many abuses that have arisen from the federal war on drugs.

“Remember, “non-violent” does not mean “unimportant.” It’s important to fight all crime. Drug crimes in particular exact a terrible toll and rob people young and old of hope,” Harris wrote in her book.

Trending: Southern Baptist Convention to Rename Itself In Nod to Black Lives Matter Movement

“And remember that many of these offenders are small players in the underground business of drug sales and trafficking, and therefore are closely linked with gangs, violence, and gun crimes,” she continued.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Harris then reaffirmed her support for charging and arresting all non-violent offenders.

“While we need to arrest and make all offenders accountable for their crimes, we are finding ways to transform the status quo approach that results in offense-arrest-jail-offense-arrest-jail—a pattern I sometimes call “synchronized drowning”—into a new path of accountability and reintegration that builds stronger, safer communities,” Harris added.

In the era of Black Lives Matter, Harris’ pro-police sentiments put her out of step with the mainstream of the Democratic Party.

“Virtually all law-abiding citizens feel safer when they see officers walking a beat,” Harris wrote. “This is as true in economically poor areas as in wealthy ones.”

She denied any assertion that law enforcement is racist, which is now accepted as a self-evident truth among radicalized liberals.

“There is a widely held notion that poor communities, particularly poor African-American and Latino communities, consider law enforcement the enemy and that they do not want police officers in their neighborhoods,” she wrote writes. “In fact, the opposite is true. Both my experience and scientific surveys reflect this fact again and again. … I can state categorically that economically poor people want and support law enforcement.”

Harris even boasted about how many people her tough-on-crime policies helped send to jail in San Francisco.

“We are sending three times as many offenders to state prison than we were in 2001, three years before I took office,” Harris wrote about her time as the city’s attorney general. “We also increased conviction rates for drug sellers.”

Harris is currently targeting former Vice President Joe Biden for his decades-long record as a career politician of supporting policies to eviscerate civil liberties and target racial minorities.

“There was a little girl in California who was part of the second class to integrate her public schools, and she was bused to school every day. And that little girl was me,” Harris said, as she hammered Biden on opposing busing integration in the 1970s during a recent Democratic Party presidential debate.

But Harris has skeletons in her own closet that she must account for. Her tough-on-crime record that may ultimately prevent her from securing the Democratic Party presidential nomination, as more liberal ares demanding an extreme option than ever before.

Campaign 2020

VOTE STEAL: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules to Count Mail-in Votes Submitted After Election Day

The upcoming electoral fraud takes shape.

Published

on

The Pennsylvania supreme court has made an incomprehensible ruling on Thursday that will allow mail-in ballots to be submitted and processed days after the election as long as the mail is postdated on election day or prior. According to the Inquirer, mail-in ballots will be allowed as long as it cannot be proven they were mailed after election day due to the ruling.

This will obviously open the potentiality for fraud, with activists having days to fill in the gaps and ramp up the totals for their candidates. The court also made other rulings that may allow Democrats to cheat more easily.

The supreme court ruled to allow drop boxes for the hand delivery of mail-in ballots. They are also refusing to allow Trump supporters from serving as poll watchers in other counties than their own, which means there will be fewer whistleblowers rooting out fraud. Additionally, they denied a request for other people to deliver mail-in ballots on behalf of voters.

Big League Politics has reported on how monolithic corporations are already saying that they will do everything in their power to censor all chatter casting doubt what is determined by the fake news media:

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is preparing to censor chatter on his social media platform doubting the legitimacy of November’s elections.

“What we and the other media need to start doing is preparing the american people that there is nothing illegitimate about this election taking additional days or even weeks to make sure all the votes are counted,” Zuckerberg said during an appearance on “Axios on HBO.”

“In fact, that might be important to make sure that this is a legitimate and fair election,” he added.

Zuckerberg says that his social network will be deploying a constant barrage of propaganda to convince the public that the vote is legitimate.

“So if one of the candidates in any of the races claims victory before there’s a consensus result, then we’re going to add some informational context to that post directly,” Zuckerberg said.

“I think this is important because there is, unfortunately, I think, a heightened risk of civil unrest in the period between voting and a result being called or after that, and I just think that we need to be doing everything that we can do reduce the chances of violence and civil unrest in the wake of the election,” he added…

The role of Big Tech in this election steal conspiracy is going to be key. From Zuckerberg’s comments, it seems like he is embracing his role as technocratic henchman for the New World Order.

There have already been prominent cases of electoral abnormalities that have emerged in recent elections in New Jersey and California due to widespread mail-in voting. After failing to rig the presidential election in 2016, the globalist establishment is playing for keeps this time around.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending