Connect with us

Sanctity Of Life

JUSTICE: UNC Student ARRESTED After Stealing Pro-Life Group’s Sign (VIDEO)

“If you don’t like their speech, you can go away,” the officer told the thief.

Published

on

In a display of justice on the campus of the University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, a young woman was arrested after stealing a sign from a pro-life group.

A video uploaded to YouTube by Created Equal shows a girl running away with one of the group’s signs, before she is stopped by a police officer.

“Did you steal their sign?” the officer asked the girl.

Trending: VIDEO: Chinese Factory Worker Caught Contaminating Hundreds of Medical Face Masks

“I just moved it,” she replied.

take our poll - story continues below

Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump?

  • Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Well, you took it,” the officer said.

The officer asked why she “ripped the sign out of his hands,” referring to the pro-life activist. She gave complained that she did not like the sign because it “restricts women’s rights.” She tried to walk away, but the officer quickly told her she was being detained.

“Detained for what?” she asked.

“Larceny,” the officer replied. “You stole his sign.”

When she said she only moved it fifty yards, the officer replied with a lesson in property rights.

“I don’t care if you moved it one foot,” he said. “You don’t have the right to take someone else’s property. Okay? Period. I don’t care what the circumstance is. You don’t have a right to take anyone’s property. He was holding it, therefore it was his, and you took it. I know you may not agree with what’s being said, but you don’t have a right to take someone’s property.”

The woman pleaded with the officer when she realized that she was in serious trouble, complaining that the officers were protecting pro-lifers.

“Do you see us being subjected to this shit?” she said.

Again, the police officer took her to school, this time explaining the First Amendment.

“Well this is a public display, okay?” he said. “They have a right to be here. If you don’t like their speech you can go away. You don’t have to watch it. You don’t have to be here, okay? You can ignore them. If you ignore them, that takes away their power. It’s just that simple.”

After another plea about abortion access in North Carolina, she was finally arrested.

“I cannot believe this is happening,” she said, as though she was exempt from the law. “Is there something else I can do?”

“No,” the officer replied. “I just told you you’re under arrest. I cannot un-arrest you.”

In the end, justice was served.

WATCH:


Follow Peter D’Abrosca on Twitter: @pdabrosca

Like Peter D’Abrosca on Facebook: facebook.com/peterdabrosca

Preorder Peter D’Abrosca’s Book: Enemies: The Press vs. The American People”

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Have a hot tip for Big League Politics?

Got a hot news tip for us? Photos or video of a breaking story? Send your tips, photos and videos to tips@bigleaguepolitics.com. All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff.

Have something to say? Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions@bigleaguepolitics.com.

Sanctity Of Life

Federal Judge Issues Ruling to Allow Elective Abortions in Texas Amidst Coronavirus Pandemic

The abortion industry will continue during coronavirus.

Published

on

A federal judge has issued an injunction against Texas Governor Greg Abbott after he banned elective abortions from taking place during the coronavirus pandemic.

U.S. District Court Judge Lee Yeakel, who was appointed to the bench by former President George W. Bush, made the ruling in Austin on Monday banning state officials from preventing abortions in Texas. Abortion providers will be able to perform abortions without restriction at least temporarily because of the ruling.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton wrote in a legal brief that the prohibition on elective abortions was needed to “preserve desperately needed medical supplies for the health care professionals combating the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.”

“Medical professionals are in dire need of supplies, and abortion providers who refuse to follow state law are demonstrating a clear disregard for Texans suffering from this medical crisis,” Paxton said.

take our poll - story continues below

Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump?

  • Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Judge Yeakel claimed that the constitutional right for women to snuff out the lives of babies the womb trumps all public health concerns during an unprecedented crisis.

“Regarding a woman’s right to a pre-fetal-viability abortion, the Supreme Court has spoken clearly,” Yeakel wrote. “There can be no outright ban on such a procedure. This court will not speculate on whether the Supreme Court included a silent ‘except-in-a-national-emergency clause’ in its previous writings on the issue.”

Because of Judge Yeakel’s decision, the ban on elective abortions in Texas is off until at least April 13 when a court hearing will be held over the phone.

Big League Politics reported last week on the leftist hysteria that occurred after the states of Texas and Ohio announced their temporary ban on elective abortions:

States like Ohio and Texas have enacted orders to cease all non-essential surgeries.

NBC DFW highlights that these moves “have unleashed a new battle over access to abortions during the coronavirus pandemic.”

Texas Governor Greg Abbott issued a statewide order on Sunday March 22, 2020 to limit the use of medical supplies hospitals will need as they plan for rising numbers infections resulting from the Wuhan virus. The order prevents hospitals from carrying out surgeries unless the patient experiences an immediate risk for “serious adverse medical consequences or death, as determined by the patient’s physician.” …

Republican Attorney General Dave Yost sent letters to Ohio clinics on Friday, March 20, 2020 ordering them to stop all “non-essential” surgical abortions. Yost wrote that the procedures are in violation of a March 17 order enacted by the state health director.

Clinics, pro-baby killing groups, and some state elected officials criticized this move, claiming that abortions are both essential and time-sensitive.

“During an emergency, there is always a chance of government overreach under the guise of `security’ or adherence to `law and order,’” the Ohio Democratic Women’s Legislative Caucus declared in a statement. “In times of national crisis, we have seen egregious acts that have circumvented our freedoms before. And make no mistake – we are seeing them today.”

The baby-murder industry will continue unabated, thanks to the activist judiciary, even if it means putting the public at serious risk of catching coronavirus.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending