Conservative commentator Laura Ingraham recently exposed the true endgame of Democrat’s support for open borders.
On a podcast episode, she claims that Democrats “value the benefits that illegal immigrants will get over the value of a sovereign and independent and free nation, that is well within its sovereign right to enforce her borders.”
Ingraham also noted that Democrats would always retort that “We’re for legal immigration.” But now with how entrenched mass migration has become, she understands what is truly at play.
No, you’re for replacing the current American population, or swamping the current American population, with a new population of people who are perhaps more hospitable to socialist ideals.
She understands that these new phases of mass migration are about radically transforming America on both political and social lines.
So, they have to have a new electorate — and the new electorate, they think will be new immigrants who are just — they’re not in tune, at least in this current — going through this current public schools situation that we have, they’re not in tune with the American founding, or even taught to love the American founding.
Certain conservative commentators are catching on to this trend, as witnessed with Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with retired Colonel Douglas MacGregor.
Mass migration is now a political weapon that Democrats are exploiting in the Sun Belt, especially in states like Texas that showed some promise during the 2018 election. Then, Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke put on a surprising performance against incumbent Senator Ted Cruz.
Certain indicators show that Democrats may be on to something regarding mass migration, with certain trends pointing to third world migrants being a solid bloc vote for Democrats. One way or the other, continued mass migration trends could fundamentally alter the political climate in America like never before.
Federal Government Threatens to Defund Connecticut School Districts for Allowing Males to Compete in Female Sports
In a “letter of impending enforcement action” released on May 28, 2020, the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights declared that The Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference violated Title IX by “permitting the participation of certain male student-athletes” in girls’ track events at several school districts.
The federal investigation was kicked off last summer and were the result of the Alliance Defending Freedom filing a complaint on behalf three female students. The Justice Department took sides with female students during the past month.
The biological females sustained that the “Transgender Participation” policy, which was first enacted seven years ago, were stripped of their rights under Title IX by allowing “boys who are male in every biological and physiological respect” compete in their sports, provided that they “claim a female gender identity.”
The CIAC policy started to yield troubling results when two biological males who identified as girls began dominating girls’ track meets. This policy is less stringent than the NCAA’s transgender policy, which mandates males to take testosterone-suppressing hormones for at least a year before participating in female sports competitions.
Three school districts violated Title IX by also participating in CIAC athletic events. “Glastonbury, Canton, and Danbury placed female student-athletes in athletic events against male student-athletes, resulting in competitive disadvantages for female student-athletes,” federal officials stated.
The athletic events in which the female student-athletes competed were coeducational; female student-athletes were denied the opportunity to compete in events that were exclusively female, whereas male student-athletes were able to compete in events that were exclusively male.
On top of that, three other districts – Hartford, Bloomfield and Cromwell – violated Title IX by allowing two biological males, Terry Miller and Andraya Yearwood, compete on female teams per CIAC policy. According to the OCR, the conference and six districts “treated student-athletes differently based on sex.”
According to Greg Piper of the College Fix, “The letter uses pseudonyms for the students but all have been previously named. The girls filed a related lawsuit in February under their real names: Alanna Smith, Chelsea Mitchell and Selina Soule.”
The conference and six districts rejected “resolution agreements” with OCR, prompting the office to issue them “letters of impasse” on March 17. These are basically warning letters. The office initially gave them 10 days to comply. They then extended the deadline by an additional 30 days as a result of “their COVID-19-related duties and responsibilities.”
At the moment, OCR will either “initiate administrative proceedings” to block federal funding for the conference and districts or hand the cases over to the Justice Department in order for it to enforce federal law.
It’s good to see athletes finally get justice.
Thanks to the Left grabbing control of so many American institutions, Americans are subjected to a wide array of politically correct experiments.
This is a solid victory which should be built upon by the Trump administration and members of Congress.
Violent Left3 days ago
Brooklyn Lawyers Arrested, Charged With Molotov Cocktail Attacks on Police Vehicles
Tech3 days ago
Laura Loomer Calls for Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey’s Arrest for Aiding and Abetting ANTIFA Terrorists
Violent Left3 days ago
Gang of Rioters Brutally Attack Alabama Journalists on Camera
States3 days ago
Medical Examiner: George Floyd Was High on Fentanyl During Police Encounter and Died of Heart Attack
Violent Left4 days ago
WATCH: Austin Rioters Cheer As They Burn Homeless Man’s Possessions
Violent Left4 days ago
Minnesota GOP Chairwoman Calls For Democratic Governor, Minneapolis Mayor to Resign
Deplorables2 days ago
Tucker Takes Jared Kushner, White House Liberals to Task for Lackluster Trump Administration Response to Riots
News3 days ago
ESPN Writer Incites Rioters to Burn Up Buildings, But Then Gets Butthurt When Riots Kick Off Near His Neighborhood