Connect with us

News

Left-Wing Fox News Host Chris Wallace Badgers Mick About ‘Anti-Muslim Bigotry’

Published

on

Left-wing Fox News host Chris Wallace confronted White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney about why President Donald Trump is not denouncing supposed “anti-Muslim bigotry” following the New Zealand mosque shooting. The shooter’s motives in his manifesto were rambling and predicated on sparking strategic political conflict in the United States focused on issues including the Second Amendment, but the globalist establishment media is making this a worldwide referendum on Islamaphobia.

Chris Wallace of Murdoch-owned Fox News is all too happy to play his part in the global Narrative, showing tapes of President Trump supposedly inspiring the Islamaphobia that the left-wing media wants to talk about instead of the migrant invasion at our southern border.

“You’ve seen the president stand up for religious liberty, individual liberty. The president is not a white supremacist. I’m not sure how many times we have to say that,” Mulvaney told the left-wing Fox News host.

They have to say it a lot because they — the White House people — choose to give credibility to networks like Fox News, which mostly push a politically correct globalist agenda. Fox even denounced and muzzled their own host Jeanine Pirro for asking questions about Islam. Fox News clearly takes its own conservative viewers for granted, which is a bad business decision considering they only get around 3 million viewers in primetime and President Trump — who keeps Fox News relevant for some reason — garnered 62.9 million votes in the 2016 election.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

As I wrote:

8 PM host Tucker Carlson should be getting paid more than anyone else at Fox News. The “America First” journalist’s presence on the Fox airwaves is the only thing keeping most independent-minded Americans from ditching the Murdoch-owned network once and for all, thus sparing Fox from the populist backlash that the Murdochs should probably realize is coming for them.

Fox News did it to themselves by becoming a controlled-opposition Quisling network with contempt for their own viewers. Tucker, on the other hand, is our guy. So if Fox ever bends to Media Matters pressure to fire Tucker Carlson, they will be declaring war against the very people who still reluctantly put up with their vengeful conservative monopoly. It would be a bad move for them. Since Generals MacArthur and Patton never telegraphed to the enemy what was coming ahead of time, we won’t spoil any surprises. But yeah, Fox News would be wise not to mess with our guy.

Tucker Carlson is the real deal, the conscience of Big Conservative Media, the last standard-bearer (along with Big League Politics) preventing a bunch of Fox-branded grifters from just going around telling people that America First is really about constant foreign wars or a pathway to citizenship for Dreamers, or whatever. By nature, Trump is happy with anybody who just perfunctorily supports him (READ: The Trump Administration) so it’s important to have principled ideologues on the outside.

I happen to believe that Donald Trump is a great president — the only guy who even halfway agrees with us who could have won the 2016 election — but it’s important not to allow the Trump administration to completely hijack the “America First” brand, which existed powerfully before Trump. Trump is the man, don’t get me wrong. I even called him the “Best President Ever” after his recent CPAC speech, and I mean it. The stuff he does that has nothing to do with policy — serving McDonald’s in the White House, for instance — is so awesome that he helps us inspire people, to keep the movement going after Trump.

But what would that movement look like if the Blue Check Conservative Pundits get to define it? Would it look like Nikki Haley being the “MAGA” candidate in 2024? With many real Trump supporters banned from the Internet, we increasingly have to play ball with neocons who hate our very existence. The Trump people never drew a line in the sand. So Trump’s message gets muddied.

Fox News is the worst offender.

The Fox News greenroom is what it would look like if the Deep State tried to throw a very bizarre Hollywood party in 1995. You’ve got Geraldo and other OJ-Era celebrities hanging out (is Mark Fuhrman still on there?) plus some former colonels who make their living bashing Trump, and then some totally extraneous comedians and B-list actresses. Somehow, Shep Smith got in there, and Juan Williams, and Dana Perino. Yawn.

Look no further than Election Night 2018, when Karl Rove (really, Karl Rove) was the main star as the Republicans did their Deep State-sanctioned “Losing” act, calling House races early in the night to make it seem like the voters were rejecting Trump’s agenda, instead of the real truth, which is that quisling Paul Ryan threw the race with the help of a bunch of thankfully-retiring RINO’s. But Rove pretended to be optimistic on Fox for months ahead of the election, which only made it easier for Big Conservative Media to ignore our urgent reporting on then-candidates Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Look no further than Jesse Watters (for reference, he was the “man on the street” comedian guy on the O’Reilly Factor, and now they let him talk about politics) actually telling (warning?) Michelle Malkin to apologize for her CPAC speech bashing the Do-Nothing Republican Establishment and urging them to fight on the only issue that matters: the erasure of our borders and globalist subjugation of our people through mass immigration.

Hey, buddy, Michelle Malkin is a real writer and she doesn’t apologize to you, or to the corporate suits who tell you what to say.

https://twitter.com/FaithGoldy/status/1104589632082202625?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1104589632082202625&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fblp.flywheelsites.com%2Fif-neocon-fox-news-dares-to-mess-with-tucker-then-they-will-be-declaring-war-against-america-first%2F

Then there’s Sean Hannity, who is pretty much Lindsey Graham’s sidekick at this point in his own 9 PM time slot. Does Sean Hannity want to run for president in 2024 with the Trump brand? I sincerely hope not. For a real populist, looking at Sean Hannity’s face is a trying experience. Because we all remember how Sean made his bones, by being a main media propagandist for Fox News’ Iraq War. Has Sean ever apologized for blindly, selfishly leading our people into the most destructive foreign policy disaster in American history? It wouldn’t matter anyway. The American blood has already been shed. Sean makes a whole lot of money (unlike the black people he evicts from their apartments), but all the money in the world can’t buy salvation.

Don’t worry, we’ll lay off you during the re-election year, Sean, but we’ll never forget.

Tucker is the Dean. Show some respect.

Immigration

Mara Elvira Salazar is No Friend of America First Nationalism

Republican leaders would be wise to ignore all of her political advice.

Published

on

If there’s one Republican leader that young activists should never listen to, it’s Florida Congresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar. 

Salazar, who is a Cuban American, has been an outspoken advocate of loosening U.S. immigration laws. In fact, she even confronted known immigration hawk and key Trump adviser Stephen Miller at a Republican Study Committee weekly lunch on February 24, 2021. She specifically criticized Trump’s immigration message and demanded that the GOP be more inclusive in its outreach.

“I told him [Miller] that the GOP needs to attract the browns,” stated Salazar. “We, for the last 30 years since Ronald Reagan, have not sent the right message to the browns,” she continued. “Reagan was the last guy who gave a path to citizenship to 3 million people … 35 years ago. It’s time for us to do the same thing that Reagan did.”

Salazar doubled down on her pro-immigration message when she went on Larry Kudlow’s show on March 2 and declared that former President Donald Trump would have done better with Hispanics by advocating for looser immigration. Journalist Ryan Girdusky noted how some of Trump’s advisers were already pushing for amnesty lite policies:

Girdusky added that Salazar was rather unhinged in her criticism of Miller’s vision for the GOP:

Salazar made a lot of noise about the Hispanic vote, despite ignoring how Trump improved his Hispanic numbers between 2016 and his re-election bid in 2020 from 28% to 32%. And he did so without much Hispandering or campaigning on passing amnesty. 

The unsavory fact that the GOP consultant class and the likes of Salazar refuse to acknowledge is that the Black Lives Matter unrest alone likely pushed significant segments of the Hispanic population into the Democrats’ arms. BLM radicalism alienated Americans of all backgrounds., but Hispanics were not having any of this kind of ruckus. Even Hispanic Democrats, of all groups, largely supported strong military action during the riots.

In reality, Hispanic support for Trump is largely based on his bluster and political bluntness, which many minority groups find comfort in. 

However, Republicans like Salazar gets it all wrong by thinking that expanding immigration both legal and illegal is a key to the Republican Party success. The Republican Party will have to concede that they can make gains with Hispanics at the margins but they cannot expect to win the majority of the Hispanic vote due to Hispanics’ propensity to support many causes ranging from gun control to more government involvement in healthcare. Data from the Pew Research Center demonstrates these beliefs among Hispanics. Nevertheless, there are some avenues for outreach with this demographic  but they must be done right. 

The key for Republican success is the white working class voters, which played a crucial role in putting Trump over the top in the Midwest back in 2016. These voters are not the most reliable in terms of turnout, but they comprise a vast segment of the American electorate. Any candidate who can activate them could potentially build a hegemonic electoral coalition for years to come. The goal for a sane Republican campaign is to maximize turnout and support among the WWC. 

Such inroads with WWC voters are more important than meeting a diversity quota the likes of Salazar and naive Republican strategists would like the party to pursue. Any nationalist campaign worth its salt would be promoting the following: Infrastructure projects targeting the Midwest, the restriction of both illegal and legal immigration, and re-shoring programs to bring jobs back. 

On the other hand, following Salazar’s program is the way that the GOP will become irrelevant and alienate many WWC voters who are already on the fence with regards to the Republican Party. These voters are not going to gravitate towards Republicans just because of the “R” next to their name. They still must be catered to and pushing for amnesty is one way to turn working class voters off.

Under Salazar’s watch, the GOP will simply be going back to the politically correct ways of the Bush administration. To tap into the sleeping giants that is the WWC, Republican leaders should ignore everything Salazar has to say and get fully behind nationalist policies such as immigration restriction, infrastructure development, and re-shoring. 

 

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending