Connect with us

Culture

Liberal Hero Taylor Swift Condemned as Anti-Semite for Calling Out Soros Family Greed

Swift didn’t get the memo that the Soros family is off limits.

Published

on

Liberal hero Taylor Swift, who has embraced progressive politics in recent years to widespread mainstream acclaim, is in the establishment’s dog house after calling out the greed of George Soros’ family.

Swift has had a dispute with the Soros family for months now over their supposedly disreputable business dealings. Because she has frequently called out the Soros family, the media that once fawned over her is beginning to turn on her and call her an anti-Semite.

The dispute comes from her dealings with Big Machine Records, the company in which she recorded her first six albums. Big Machine sold the original records of her songs, which are regularly referred to as “masters” in the music industry, to Scooter Braun, a talent manager with deep ties to George Soros’ son Alex.

Trending: Deranged Democrat Demands Prosecution of 40,000 Trump Supporters Who Were OUTSIDE Capitol

“After I was denied the chance to purchase my music outright, my entire catalog was sold to Scooter Braun’s Ithaca Holdings in a deal that I’m told was funded by the Soros family, 23 Capital and that Carlyle Group,” Swift said in December.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Swift was criticized for her December comments, but she recently doubled down in an Instagram post as she refuses to give the Soros family a pass despite their obscene wealth and elite connections.

Her controversial Instagram post calling out the Soros family can be seen here:

Soros’ minions immediately started a campaign against Swift as a result of her Instagram remarks, accusing her of engaging in anti-Semitic dog whistling, which is a frequent complaint deployed against anyone who criticizes the Soros family in any manner.

“Taylor Swift deploying a Soros dogwhistle is …… a choice,” Tara Mulholland, a CNN producer, wrote in a tweet.

“You have every right to be upset about others profiting off your music. But PLEASE don’t share antisemitic conspiracy theories about the Soros family,” wrote Bend the Arc, a Jewish special interest group that promotes far-left politics. “‘Shameless greed’ is a dog-whistle used against Jews. Your Jewish fans deserve better.”

Big League Politics has reported about how Swift has embraced left-wing politics to help her career as her biological clock rapidly ticks down, and she tries to make the jump from the music industry to Hollywood:

Swift announced that the music on her new album will have “political undertones.”

Her album is set to release before the 2020 elections.

In an Instagram post, Swift stated that her new songs will be filled with “political undertones” and will be used as a way to get her fans registered to vote and become politically active before the 2020 elections.

In an interview with Elle Magazine, Swift stated “I definitely think there are political undertones in the new music I made.”

She added, “I’m not planning to stop encouraging young people to vote and to try to get them to talk about what’s going on in our country. I think that’s one of the most important things I could do.”

Swift endorsed Democratic candidate Phil Bredesen against Republican candidate Marsha Blackburn in the 2018 U.S. Senate election in Tennessee. Swift supported Bredesen because she believed that Blackburn was weak on issues such as gay marriage, the Violence Against Women Act, and equal pay legislation.

Swift emphasized her political advocacy now claiming that it is her responsibility to call out dangerous rhetoric” and “racism.” She stated, “Invoking racism and provoking fear through thinly veiled messaging is not what I want from our leaders, and I realized that it actually is my responsibility to use my influence against that disgusting rhetoric.”

Swift is learning that bowing to the Left means groveling to masters such as the Soros’ clan. She will continue to receive admonishment from the fake news media unless she drops her feud with Alex Soros over her music.

Snowflakes

Judge Dismisses Transgender Woman’s “Discrimination” Lawsuit Against Miss USA Pageant

Miss USA remains a pageant for biological females only.

Published

on

Last Thursday a federal judge dismissed a transgender woman’s lawsuit that accused the Miss USA pageant of discrimination.

Anita Noelle Green is a biological male who claimed that “she” had a right to participate in the pageant’s competitions, but US District Judge Michael W. Mosman found that the law is not on “her” side.

Judge Mosman ruled that Miss United States of America LLC, a private corporation, cannot be forced to violate its mission of promoting “natural-born” females.

“I view it as an association that cannot under the Constitution be required to allow plaintiff to participate in what defendant says is a contradiction of that message,” he said.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Green competed in the 2018 Miss Montana pageant and won the 2019 Miss Earth Elite Oregon competition—but Miss USA denied “her” application. Green’s lawyer attempted to argue that the Miss USA corporation is predominately a commercial business that’s granted “minimal protection,” not a First Amendment-protected “expressive association.”

Judge Mosman, however, disagreed and found the pageant corporation to be a predominately expressive association, meaning that it is engaged in expressive activity and promotes a message.

In related news, Big League Politics recently covered Sen. Rand Paul’s confrontation with transgender HHS nominee Rachel Levine about “her” unwillingness to say that minors shouldn’t be bypassing their parents and making their own decisions about transitioning:

At Thursday’s Senate confirmation hearings, Sen. Rand Paul confronted Rachel Levine, a transgender doctor and Biden’s Assistant HHS Secretary nominee, asking if “she” supports minors overriding their parents on transitioning to the opposite sex.

[…]

Levine’s response was as follows: “Senator, transgender medicine is a very complex and nuanced field, and if confirmed to the position of Assistant Secretary of Health, I would certainly be pleased to come to your office and talk with you and your staff about the standards of care…”

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending