Connect with us

Snowflakes

Liberal Snowflakes Freak Out as Black-on-White Hate Crime is Reported at Ohio State University

Published

on

Left-wing snowflakes are up in arms after Ohio State University (OSU) reported a black-on-white hate crime to the campus.

OSU reported earlier this month that at least one black student allegedly committed the hate crime, punching a white student in the face after calling him a racial slur. They followed federal law to report this hate crime to the campus.

This is when the liberal snowflakes flipped out, as they make it clear that white lives do not matter to their civilizational death cult.

Trending: North Carolina Police Officer Viciously Beaten as Onlookers Laugh, Film for 11 Minutes

Student Solidarity at OSU posted these sickening messages over Twitter:

Over 100 left-wing students even gathered to protest black-on-white crimes being reported, clearly demonstrating that they want whites to be victimized in silence:

A particularly low IQ student of color claimed that OSU was “mocking their entire Black student body” by following federal law and reporting a hate crime:

The Student Solidarity group made it clear that their position is that white people can be discriminated against and terrorized by people of color, and it should not be reported and society should not care about it:

It is becoming more obvious due to the actions of the radical left that they want to commit a full-blown cultural genocide against the West and will happily subject white people to dehumanization in order to achieve their maniacal ends.

Big League Politics has reported on how it is actually black people who are committing the majority of the hate crimes across America, which is in turn ignored and misrepresented by the fake news media, the Democrat Party, left-wing academia, and the subverted deep state.

As cities are burned to the ground by diversity mobs nationwide, federal officials have assured us that the real terror threat isn’t the Black Lives Matter uprising that is unleashing an orgy of destruction. The real threat, according to our vaunted intelligence community, is evil white supremacists…

However, a close examination of the facts show that these deep state hacks are lying. They are relying on propaganda from left-wing thought control groups like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) instead of using the actual data to make their determinations.

According to the Justice Department data from 2017 (long before the ongoing BLM anti-white riots started), black Americans are over-represented by 50 percent in the number of overall hate crimes committed. Meanwhile, whites are underrepresented by 24 percent. The results are consistent for other years as well, showing that it is blacks who are committing a disproportionate amount of hate crimes.

Blacks also commit hate crimes at a rate that is three times higher than whites per 100,000 Americans, according to FBI crime data in 2016-2017. The SPLC’s own data even shows that blacks are more than twice as likely to join a hate group. When it comes to domestic extremist terrorism, it is the same story. Blacks are once again far more likely to commit terrorist attacks than their white counterparts.

According to homeland security data, blacks are yet again over-represented by 19.4 percent when committing domestic extremist attacks. Meanwhile, whites are underrepresented yet again by 32 percent. Despite making up just 13 percent of the population, blacks accounted for over 32 percent of domestic extremist attacks that occurred between 2015 and 2019. Over the same time period, whites only accounted for 29 percent of the domestic extremist attacks even though they made up 62 percent of the total population.

The facts are clear: whites are statistically far less likely to commit domestic terrorism or engage in other violent racist activity than blacks. However, the feds still focus their efforts on white people while giving a pass to blacks who burn, loot and murder at epidemic rates in cities across the country.

The radical left’s agenda ends in genocide. Their relentless demonization of white people and ignoring of any hate, violence or terrorism against whites proves that.

Culture

Student Government Impeaches Pro-Trump Latina Student Senator for Her Opposition to Illegal Immigration

Free Speech Continues to Die at American Universities

Published

on

A Latina student at Loyola Marymount University was impeached for simply being against illegal immigration. Stephanie Martinez is the student government Senator for diversity and inclusion.

Her pro-Trump views have made her an easy target for the PC enforcers at her university. The College Fix reported that Martinez was subject to an impeachment on the night of October 11, 2020 by her colleagues at the Associated Students of Loyola Marymount University (ASLMU). The impeachment trial took three hours.

The impeachment proceedings kicked off last Spring following the discovery of several tweets coming from Martinez in which she voiced her opposition to illegal immigration.

A week ago, student Senator Camille Orozco submitted a motion contending that Martinize violated Article 8 of the student bylaws, which stipulates “conduct that severely damages the integrity or authority of ASLMU or the office held by the individual in question.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

In her opening statement, Orozco made the case that Martinez’s impeachment did not infringe on her right to free speech and instead dealt with “conduct which has severely damaged the integrity, or authority of ASLMU or the office held by Senator Martinez.”

She made the assertion that Martinez’s remarks hurt the relationship between Associated Students of Loyola Marymount University and pro-mass migration groups at the university such as First To Go and The Learning Community.

Martinez defended herself by saying that “despite what was stated, that this is not about free speech or political identity, I argue that this is not the case.”

She added:

The impeachment case against me was brought forward as a result of the Loyolan article and subsequent petition in response to my creation of the Students for Trump Instagram page.

The student government’s constitution outlines how no officer or member of the student government can face discrimination for their political affiliations.

However, two ASLMU officers took an anti-free speech approach to this matter. Chief Programming Officer Brion Dennis and Director of Free Speech & Expression Robyn De Leon backed up Orozco’s case against Martinez.

De Leon was of the opinion that Martinez’s tweets were not subject to free speech protections due to how they were “very alienating of unrepresented and marginalized communities. She cited Martinez’s usage of the term “illegal alien” as for why her speech should not merit First amendment protections.

Phillip Nieto of the College Fix provided the following background information for De Leon:

De Leon serves in the ASLMU cabinet while moonlighting as a writer for Agency LMU, a progressive LMU student news blog. She was also a co-author of the original article that dug up Martinez’s old tweets.

Scott Meyers, vice president of LMU College Republicans, came to Martinez’s defense and said during his testimony that, “I think a lot of what conservatives stand for is freedom of speech, and I believe that this is entirely a free speech issue.”

In her closing argument, Martinez described the trial as a “sham.” She viewed it as “a kangaroo court and conservative students on campus are furious.” She ended her defense by posing the following question:

 So I want to ask you, how will you represent conservative students on campus?

The senate ended up voting 18-1 for impeachment. 2 members abstained from the vote.

A number of conservative students at the LMU campus started a Change.org petition in response to this impeachment proceeding in order to  “hold ASLMU accountable for false impeachment.” So far, over 300 people have signed on to the petition.

With how radicalized universities are becoming these days, it’s probably best that right wingers cpt for trade schools or universities that cater to conservatives, unless they are pursuing STEM or other hard skills.

 

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending