Connect with us

Politics

Lindsey Graham Fires Back At Sexist Mazie Hirono: “I Will Not Shut Up”

Published

on

A Republican Senator from South Carolina fired back after one of his Democrat colleagues on the Senate Judiciary Committee made blatantly sexist, misandrist remarks twice in the past two weeks.

“I know I’m a single white male from South Carolina, and I’m told I should shut up, but I will not shut up, if that’s okay,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) at Friday’s Committee hearing to proceed with a Senate floor vote on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

Less than two weeks ago, while Kavanaugh’s name was being smeared by baseless, unprovable sexual misconduct claims, Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) told men to “do the right thing for a change” and “shut up.”

Trending: Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

“Guess who’s perpetuating these kinds of actions,” she said. “It’s the men of this country. “I just want to say to the men in this country – just shut up and step up. Do the right thing for a change.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Graham made it perfectly clear last week that he is finished with the political left’s ridiculous antics.

Normally mild-mannered and generally known as a moderate, he won over many Republicans this week, including this reporter, after he let loose on the Democrats on the Judiciary Committee during Kavanaugh’s Thursday testimony, calling the process “the most unethical sham since [he’s] been in politics.”

Throwing shade at misandrists will only score him more points with sane people who recognize that sexism is wrong, regardless of which gender is promoting it.

 

Campaign 2020

WATCH: Fulton County Poll Manager Susan Voyles Recounts Election Improprieties in Georgia Recount

Shocking allegations.

Published

on

A Georgia woman who submitted a sworn affidavit regarding election improprieties has recorded a new video detailing her experience assisting in Georgia’s recount of the 2020 election ballots.

Susan Voyles is a veteran Georgia elections poll manager who submitted a sworn affidavit in a Trump campaign lawsuit against Georgia’s Secretary of State. She recounts some of the most significant improprieties she witnessed participating in the recount of Georgia’s election, which Joe Biden supposedly won by around 13,000 votes.

Voyles, who has done elections work for twenty years, describes counting an unusual “pristine” batch of absentee ballots that were cast 98% for Joe Biden. She states that the packaging containing these absentee ballots was unlabeled by the Secretary of State.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

We came to one batch- it was surprising, it was stark- having done this for years, I’m very familiar with how the ballots work, how they fold, how they feel, their general appearance- these ballots appeared as though the first one had been bubbled in by a person and all of them were replicated, exactly the same.

We were further alarmed that in our count 98% of these ballots were for Joseph R. Biden. Two were for Donald Trump.

That’s a very odd count. My coworker agreed with me that there was something very unusual about these ballots.”

Voyles even suspects that the unusual ballots she counted in the recount were filled out with a marking device.

Every single ballot was absolutely identical, and they appeared to be printed with some sort of marking device.

Unfortunately, it’s very difficult for elections integrity monitors to verify the veracity of these supposedly pristine absentee ballots. They’ve been separated from the envelopes that contain the supposed legal information of the voters that cast them, and they can’t be reunited with them.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending