Mainstream outlets are starting to recognize that Trump’s suggestion to investigate the World Health Organization are valid.
Robert Wright of Wired penned an article talking about Trump’s press conference where he stated that the WHO are “very biased toward China” and was “looking into” freezing US funding for the WHO.
Although Wright was not in favor of cutting funding to the WHO, he conceded that the “organization could have performed better in the early stages of the contagion, and there’s at least some reason to suspect that people at WHO knowingly and consequentially misled us.”
Wright stated that “Institutions of international governance, like institutions of national governance, are prone to a particular form of corruption: they’re inclined to serve powerful interests at the expense of their mission.”
Based on speculation, China attempted to “cover up” the Wuhan Virus outbreak and the WHO helped facilitate this.
Wright noted the following:
The most damning piece of evidence is a WHO tweet on Jan. 14 reporting that “preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission.” This came 18 days after a group of doctors notified Wuhan health officials of a disturbing cluster of illnesses, and 14 days after both China’s national government and WHO were officially notified. Is it really plausible that officials in Beijing or at WHO still doubted that the illness was moving from person to person?
However, as a strong advocate of global governance, Wright posits a different scenario:
A more likely scenario is that the Chinese government was scrambling to figure out how bad the problem was, and in the meanwhile it didn’t want to start a panic in China or tarnish its name abroad. So it did what institutions of various kinds have long done when faced with a public relations crisis. It said the most reassuring thing that was technically true: preliminary investigation hadn’t found “clear evidence” of human-to-human transmission. And it hoped it would find a way to control the contagion before it spread far within China or spread abroad. If it succeeded (and people have an amazing capacity to embrace best-case scenarios amid public relations crises), then this tactical deception wouldn’t come back to haunt it.
Wright still believes in the WHO and thinks that it could be tweaked.
Nevertheless, when mainstream commentators are at least acknowledging that president Trump may be on to something, we are on the right path.
The ultimate goal is to ignore globalist institutions like the WHO and shore up our border security to prevent future pandemics and other globalist-related maladies.
Portland Experiences Over a 100% Increase in Shootings After Anti-Gun Violence Police Force is Disbanded
In July of 2020, the city of Portland experienced 15 homicides.
According to Portland police, this is the most killings the city has experienced in one month in over three decades.
So far in 2020, 24 people have died due to homicides in Portland.
Oregon Live reported that the most recent killing took place on July 28, 2020 when a 34-year-old woman was stabbed at a Northeast Portland home after coming back from a vigil mourning the death of 27-year-old Tyrell Penney, who was murdered in a shooting on July 29.
In July 2020, there have been 63 shootings, while there was 28 in July 2019 per a Police Bureau report.
Although homicides, assaults, burglaries and vandalism have increased this year compared to 2019, total person-to-person and property crimes have plummeted compared to previous years, according to the bureau’s report.
Police Chief Chuck Lovell said on July 30 that he’s very worried about the uptick in violence and is shifting officers from patrol units to the detective division in order to shore up follow-up investigations.
He also explained that the bureau had to cut its Gun Violence Reduction Team in accordance to new policy changes the City Council ushered in. The team, which counted on 34 members, was disbanded on July 1 in response to budget cuts to police units that have allegedly targeted a disproportionate number of blacks during routine traffic stops.
Like many cities in the country, Portland is starting to embrace leftist radicalism on matters of law enforcement by considering moves to defund the police.
Oregon is already one of the more anti-gun states in the country, so lawful individuals in Portland don’t have many options at their disposal for self-defense. With police being gutted, regular citizens have even fewer options at their disposal for security.
This has obviously not registered with political elites and represents why many Americans will likely leave cities in masse in search of jurisdictions that actually bother to provide basic law enforcement infrastructure.
News4 days ago
McCain 2.0 Dan Crenshaw Proudly Votes With Democrats to Erase American History
Around The World2 days ago
FREEDOM RISING: Large Anti-Scamdemic Protests Spring Up in Germany, UK, Netherlands
Sex Crime4 days ago
BOMBSHELL: Unsealed Documents Indicate Bill Clinton Partied with Jeffrey Epstein and Two Young Girls on Pedo Island
Around The World3 days ago
Sweden’s Top COVID-19 Experts Comes Out Against Masks as Nation Returns to Normalcy
News4 days ago
Health Checkpoints, Biometric IDs, Vaccine Ink Injections: Media Reveals Orwellian ‘New Normal’ on the Horizon Due to COVID-19
Violent Left3 days ago
18 Year Old Gabriel Agard-Berryhill Arrested in Bombing of Portland Courthouse
News2 days ago
Both Parties Approve a Bill that Includes “Red Flag” Gun Confiscation Orders for Military Personnel
The Swamp3 days ago
Tennessee Democrat Charged With Stealing Hundreds of Thousands in Federal Funds for Personal Use