Connect with us

Hollywood

Major Prosecutor Declares ‘Rape Accusations are as Good as Proof’ Following Harvey Weinstein Conviction

Published

on

After Hollywood sex fiend Harvey Weinstein’s conviction for rape last week, prosecutors are salivating at the new “no evidence” standard that the case has set.

The #MeToo movement has been desperate to convict men of sexual improprieties based only on the word of the female alleged victim, as they hope to take their witch hunt to a new level. The Weinstein case is their golden opportunity to finish off the Bill of Rights once and for all.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. is happy to enable these gynocratic extremists who want to do away with due process and the presumption of innocence.

Trending: WATCH: Black Lives Matter Protestors Overwhelmed by Counter-Demonstrators in Springfield, Oregon

“It’s rape even if there is no physical evidence,” Vance said, adding that the Weinstein conviction “pulled the justice system into the 21st Century. It’s a new day. Their verdict turned the page on our justice system on men like Harvey Weinstein.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The Black Press of America noted that this new standard could be devastating to people of color, who are no stranger to unfair and biased court proceedings:

In 2019, editors at the American Bar Association’s website noted a gaping shorting when it comes to the legal concepts of “presumption of innocence,” which is not expressly enumerated in the U.S Constitution, but instead comes from the Bill of Rights.

The general theory is that every defendant charged with a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

“However, by the preconceived notion, a man of color accused of rape, by a white woman, is presumed guilty beyond a reasonable doubt,” the editors wrote.

“In the case of a white man accused of raping an African American woman, the presumption of guilt shifts from the white defendant to the African American female victim. Here, there is a presumption that a woman is unchaste because the color of her skin is black.

“Alternatively, the standard applied to the white defendant is the presumption that he is innocent until the African American victim is proven pure, innocent, and deserving of the law beyond a white person’s reasonable doubt.”

The American Bar Association editors pointed out historical cases of Black men and boys like The Groveland Four and Emmet Till, who were falsely accused, lynched, and, or, wrongly convicted of rape or sexual assault. Till was wrongly accused merely of whistling at a white woman and violently murdered by white supremacists.

Bar Association editors Chelsea Hale and Meghan Matt further noted the 2016 case of two African American students from Sacred Heart University, was falsely accused of raping a white student.

The student, Nikki Yovino, claimed she was raped in a bathroom during a party held off-campus. Investigators said they believed the woman’s initial story who said she had witnesses to back up her charges.

However, another student came forward to show sexually explicit text messages between Yovino and the accused.

Because of that, Yovino recanted and said she was worried that the consensual encounter with the two students would harm her relationship with another student she admired.

One of the falsely accused students lost his football scholarship while both were forced to withdraw from school.

“Even though a criminal trial was never held, the two young black males were given the excessive sentence of guilt before a thorough investigation was ever conducted,” Hale and Matt wrote. ”Even with Yovino’s lenient penalty for falsely reporting a crime, these two young men’s lives have been forever altered because the color of their skin was different from that of their wrongful accuser.”

Weinstein was found guilty of third-degree rape and criminal sex acts on Feb. 24. He faces up to 25 years in prison, with other criminal cases against the Hollywood pervert still pending. While nobody will cry any tears for Weinstein’s predicament, his case could lead to many innocent men being ensnared by the #MeToo jackals.

Hollywood

Michelle Obama’s Influence Over Netflix Led to Release of Pro-Pedo Movie ‘Cuties’

Published

on

Netflix is under fire for distributing the pro-pedo flick “Cuties” over its streaming video service. The movie “Cuties” is about an 11-year-old girl who discovers her sexuality while twerking.

“Cuties” has been described by its apologists as a triumph of diversity and womanhood. It should come as no surprise that this content is getting distributed as former first lady Michelle Obama is an influential producer with Netflix.

Big League Politics reported three years ago on how the Obamas were using Netflix to distribute their political propaganda and promote their social agenda after leaving the White House:

Former President Barack Obama is currently in advance negotiations with Netflix to produce a series of shows through them. This will give the former President easy access into the living rooms of virtually every American in order to spread whatever propaganda he wants.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The deal would pay both the former President, and his wife Michelle to provide exclusive content to the over 118 million Netflix subscribers around the world. It is unclear of the exact content that would be produced, but after looking at other content produced by Netflix, the shows being highly political wouldn’t be surprising.

After receiving massive investments totaling over $40 million from George Soros in 2015 and 2016, the content on the streaming service began to shift and include originally produced content with political agendas.

One show they released was titled “Dear White People,” and was extremely racially charged, as the name implies. They also released a show featuring Katie Couric that explores “gender identity,” while at the same time editing a portion of an old episode of Bill Nye the Science Guy, where Nye makes the claim that there are only two genders.

With former President Obama already going against the norm for other Presidents by attacking the current President, it’s clear that Obama is okay with getting divisively political. It would not be surprising to see his show used as a political weapon of the left.

Making matters even worse, Russia-gate villain and former national security advisor Susan Rice also sits on the Netflix board.

It should come as no surprise that Michelle is completely silent with regards to “Cuties.” This is the type of filth that her family is personally invested in promoting throughout the West. Her husband is the founder of ISIS, as President Trump so eloquently put it, after all.

Big League Politics has reported on how “Cuties” is mainstreaming child pornography and the sexualization of kids:

A Netflix film set to debut on Sept. 9 will feature profile an 11-year-old girl who joins a twerking dance crew to “explore her femininity.”

The film, called “Cuties,” will provide fodder for pedophiles and sexual deviants the world over. The description of the perverse movie reads as follows: “Amy, an 11-year-old girl, joins a group of dancers named “the cuties” at school, and rapidly grows aware of her burgeoning femininity – upsetting her mother and her values in the process.”

… The trailer has already inspired a lot of rage from YouTube critics who are sick of the LGBT agenda to sexualize and exploit innocent children.

“Jeffrey Epstein would have loved this show,” a user with the handle “MR. OBVIOUS” wrote in a comment.

“The premise is a dishonest one. One doesn’t have to be remotely religious to want to forbid their 11-year old daughter from twerking in a scantily clad clothing, but they have to make the main character a victim of a religious upbringing so that opponents of this movie would be seen as religious zealots,” commented user “zhengyingli” about the trailer.

“This looks so disgusting, I felt like I’m already on an Offenders list just watching this,” user “Junior Jr.” wrote in a comment.

“Not even trying to hide the pedo rings anymore,” wrote user “IchiPopp” in a comment.

Michelle and her husband represent the values of the third world, not the values of a Western Christian society.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending