Connect with us

Politics

Mark Meadows Slams Ryan: Calls for ‘New Leadership’ To Deal With Immigration

Published

on

House Freedom Caucus member Rep. Mark Meadows of North Carolina is calling for “new leadership” in the House Republican Caucus as Speaker Paul Ryan faces withering criticism for his indecisiveness on the immigration issue.

House Republicans have been expected to whip Rep. Goodlatte’s proposed bill before bringing it to a House vote, but the Freedom Caucus is saying that the whip operation is not happening. Goodlatte’s bill caves on DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), allowing DREAMers to stay in the country, but also tightens some other enforcement mechanisms like E-Verify.

Meadows is not happy with Ryan’s inaction on Goodlatte’s relatively moderate bill.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Meadows’ bold statement Wednesday marks a new benchmark in anti-Ryan rhetoric, in calling for “new leadership” to address Republican challenges on Capitol Hill.

Meadows’ Freedom Caucus ally Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio also strongly criticized “leadership” in an interview he conducted with Meadows with The Atlantic, stating: “I’m worried, because we were promised a full-scale push and whip operation on Goodlatte and we’ve just frankly not seen anything close to that. It’s basically Bob Goodlatte going around and talking to people, and the Freedom Caucus going around and talking to people. Other than that, you don’t hear anything from leadership about the legislation.”

The unwillingness of Ryan to put forth a vote allows Democrats and moderate Republicans to continue negotiations that could further water down the immigration plan before DACA expires next month, and keeps hope alive for Democrats to win the immigration fight outright.

Meadows recently invoked President Trump’s trademark Swamp metaphor to slam the recent budget deal, which did nothing to effectively curtail out-of-control government spending.

Campaign 2020

VOTE STEAL: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules to Count Mail-in Votes Submitted After Election Day

The upcoming electoral fraud takes shape.

Published

on

The Pennsylvania supreme court has made an incomprehensible ruling on Thursday that will allow mail-in ballots to be submitted and processed days after the election as long as the mail is postdated on election day or prior. According to the Inquirer, mail-in ballots will be allowed as long as it cannot be proven they were mailed after election day due to the ruling.

This will obviously open the potentiality for fraud, with activists having days to fill in the gaps and ramp up the totals for their candidates. The court also made other rulings that may allow Democrats to cheat more easily.

The supreme court ruled to allow drop boxes for the hand delivery of mail-in ballots. They are also refusing to allow Trump supporters from serving as poll watchers in other counties than their own, which means there will be fewer whistleblowers rooting out fraud. Additionally, they denied a request for other people to deliver mail-in ballots on behalf of voters.

Big League Politics has reported on how monolithic corporations are already saying that they will do everything in their power to censor all chatter casting doubt what is determined by the fake news media:

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is preparing to censor chatter on his social media platform doubting the legitimacy of November’s elections.

“What we and the other media need to start doing is preparing the american people that there is nothing illegitimate about this election taking additional days or even weeks to make sure all the votes are counted,” Zuckerberg said during an appearance on “Axios on HBO.”

“In fact, that might be important to make sure that this is a legitimate and fair election,” he added.

Zuckerberg says that his social network will be deploying a constant barrage of propaganda to convince the public that the vote is legitimate.

“So if one of the candidates in any of the races claims victory before there’s a consensus result, then we’re going to add some informational context to that post directly,” Zuckerberg said.

“I think this is important because there is, unfortunately, I think, a heightened risk of civil unrest in the period between voting and a result being called or after that, and I just think that we need to be doing everything that we can do reduce the chances of violence and civil unrest in the wake of the election,” he added…

The role of Big Tech in this election steal conspiracy is going to be key. From Zuckerberg’s comments, it seems like he is embracing his role as technocratic henchman for the New World Order.

There have already been prominent cases of electoral abnormalities that have emerged in recent elections in New Jersey and California due to widespread mail-in voting. After failing to rig the presidential election in 2016, the globalist establishment is playing for keeps this time around.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending