Big League Wellness
Medical ‘Expert’ Proposes Mass Pharmacological Drugging of Society to Induce Compliance with COVID-19 Mandates
They want to medicate away your freedom to choose.

A so-called medical expert, drunk off power due because of the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic, is now suggesting “morality pills” for the public to stop them from resisting their top-down mandates.
Parker Crutchfield, who works as the Associate Professor of Medical Ethics, Humanities and Law at Western Michigan University, made the suggestion in an op/ed published in The Conversation.
“When someone chooses not to follow public health guidelines around the coronavirus, they’re defecting from the public good,” Crutchfield writes.
He is proposing a solution to drug society so that individuals will no longer have the freedom of choice and be at the mercy of the whims of whoever is in power.
“Could a psychoactive pill be the solution to the pandemic? It’s a far-out proposal that’s bound to be controversial, but one I believe is worth at least considering, given the importance of social cooperation in the struggle to get COVID-19 under control,” Crutchfield writes.
He uses “experimental economics” to justify his highly invasive solution that is something out of “Brave New World.”
“Moral enhancement is the use of substances to make you more moral. The psychoactive substances act on your ability to reason about what the right thing to do is, or your ability to be empathetic or altruistic or cooperative,” Crutchfield writes.
He brings up heinous abuses that the government has performed in the past to justify new abuses in the current age.
“The scenario in which the government forces an immunity booster upon everyone is plausible. And the military has been forcing enhancements like vaccines or “uppers” upon soldiers for a long time,” Crutchfield writes.
“The scenario in which the government forces a morality booster upon everyone is far-fetched. But a strategy like this one could be a way out of this pandemic, a future outbreak or the suffering associated with climate change. That’s why we should be thinking of it now,” he concludes.
Crutchfield is far from the only medical “expert” to propose incredibly unethical measures as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr. Anthony Fauci, the NIAID director who has fostered mass hysteria at every turn throughout the crisis, has actually spoke of purposefully affecting patients with the highly-contagious virus.
Big League Politics reported on the Mengelean horror that these mad scientists and doctors are chomping at the bit to push onto society:
Scientists are actually considering purposefully infecting patients with COVID-19, as part of a supposed “human challenge trial” that would help them synthesize a vaccine for mass production, the New York Times has reported.
The Times argues that vaccine researchers have performed similar human experimentation with malaria, cholera and typhoid in the past. However, they note that the process could be dangerous because of the contagious nature of COVID-19 and the fact that there is no cure for the virus.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has stopped short at endorsing human challenge trials. They issued a report created by a 19-member advisory panel last month in which they offered recommendations regarding the safety of such trials though. The virus would be dripped into the noses of patients in order to infect them with COVID-19.
The National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), led by the infamous Dr. Anthony Fauci, is working to develop viral strains that could be used in these studies to infect patients. However, Fauci does not anticipate that these type of experiments would be necessary given the large number of individuals already infected with the virus.
Fauci does not rule out the possibility though. He said that any human challenge trial must be conducted “with absolute intense examination by a group of independent ethicists and independent people who have nothing to do with the trial.”
Science has demonstrated itself to be a dangerous false idol throughout this crisis, as Big Brother may become a permanent reality due to the societal transformation caused by COVID-19.

Big League Wellness
Biden COVID Advisor Paid to Sponsor Mask Brand Claimed Product “Deactivates” Coronavirus
This could represent a serious ethics violation.

An incoming Biden White House coronavirus advisor promoted a brand of mask he claims “deactivates” coronavirus, claiming on his personal podcast that Livinguard masks offer more protection to their wearers than other products.
There should be an immediate federal ethics investigation of incoming Biden covid advisor @ASlavitt for his claim that a mask he was pitching (for money, see below) “deactivates” the coronavirus—with no disclaimer about claims not being evaluated by FDA. pic.twitter.com/v5lnr3jZZh
— Zac Bissonnette (@ZacBissonnette) January 19, 2021
“All masks can curb the spread of COVID-19. Why I like the Livinguard masks, and why I wear them, is because they actually deactivate coronavirus thanks to their incredible patented technology that’s been shown to mitigate the spread of microorganisms like bacteria and viruses.”
Slavitt confirmed that Livinguard is a “sponsor” to him, in some capacity.
This awesome mask / sponsor we’ve been wearing & talking about on #InTheBubble has given us permission to give away 100 on Twitter! Antiviral Technology, washable and reusable. In the comments by 8/21 just mention your 3 fave episodes+follow @livinguard if you want to qualify pic.twitter.com/guQJpPaj4v
— Andy Slavitt @ 🏡🇺🇸 (@ASlavitt) August 19, 2020
Livinguard masks can be washed and reused, and they sell for as much as $30 on the company’s website. Various manufacturers of facemasks have made claims of health superiority as it pertains to their product.
Slavitt’s claim about the masks is not evaluated by the FDA, and the questionable nature of his claims could potentially incur the scrutiny of the health organization.
The former Obama administration official’s claim that the masks “deactivate” COVID is highly questionable. Experts generally agree that masks are more effective at preventing asymptomatic carriers from spreading the virus than they are in protecting the wearer from it, and Slavitt’s language implies the material of the mask is more effective in neutralizing COVID molecules than other fabric and cloth surfaces. Such a claim would represent a dramatic development in the fight against COVID, and it’s very likely the material would be adopted en masse to deter further spread of the disease.
Is Biden’s incoming coronavirus advisor a for-profit snake oil salesman?
Follow me on Twitter @Wildman_AZ, on Parler @Moorhead, and on Gab @WildmanAZ.
-
Politics3 days ago
GOP Establishment Threatens President Trump with Impeachment Unless He Denies Election Fraud
-
Big League National Security3 days ago
DNI Ratcliffe: China Interfered in 2020 Election, CIA Suppressed Info
-
White House10 hours ago
President Trump Contemplates Ditching the GOP, Starting New ‘Patriot Party’ to Put America First
-
States1 day ago
Grassroots Leaders Send Final Warning to GOP Establishment: Rejecting Trump Means Death of Republican Party
-
Tech1 day ago
Free Speech Platform Gab Receives 3 Million New Users in 12 Days
-
Politics2 days ago
Constituents Already Beginning to Turn on Peter Meijer, Who Admits That Voting to Impeach Trump May Have Ruined His Political Career
-
Free Speech2 days ago
Tennessee High School Principal Suspended for Speaking Against Big Tech Censorship
-
Big League National Security3 days ago
Left-Wing Extremist Charged in Alleged Florida Capitol Attack Identified Soros as “Sponsor”