Connect with us

Culture

Meet Shauna King: Another High-Profile Social Justice Warrior Fakes Blackness for the Added Privilege

Published

on

Following in the footsteps of leftist faux-black luminaries like Shaun King and Rachel Dolezal, George Washington University professor Jessica Krug has owned up decades of racial fakery to boost her career prospects.

Krug penned a blog on Medium coming clean about how she has faked being a black woman to get access to the privilege and special benefits she never would have received as a white woman.

“To an escalating degree over my adult life, I have eschewed my lived experience as a white Jewish child in suburban Kansas City under various assumed identities within a Blackness that I had no right to claim,” she wrote.

Trending: Grassroots Leaders Send Final Warning to GOP Establishment: Rejecting Trump Means Death of Republican Party

She wrote that she has suffered mental health issues throughout her entire life and that probably led to her developing this false identity.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024?

  • POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“But mental health issues can never, will never, neither explain nor justify, neither condone nor excuse, that, in spite of knowing and regularly critiquing any and every non-Black person who appropriates from Black people, my false identity was crafted entirely from the fabric of Black lives. That I claimed belonging with living people and ancestors to whom and for whom my being is always a threat at best and a death sentence at worst,” Krug wrote.

“I am not a culture vulture. I am a culture leech,” she added.

Before she owned up to her history of racial deceit, Krug was described publicly as an “unrepentant and unreformed child of the hood.”

While Krug has at least owned up to being a fraud and a huckster, other race fakers are far more shameless and continue to grift long after being initially exposed.

Big League Politics has reported extensively on the antics of Black Lives Matter leader Shaun King, the leftist agitator who is driving the U.S. toward a full-blown race war because he hates the color of his own white skin:

Black Lives Matter leader Shaun King, the fake black guy who regularly foments racial hatred against his own people, is endorsing “mayhem” against law-abiding Americans to bring about “a complete dismantling of American policing.”

This is not the first time that King has endorsed violence to promote his political goals. Big League Politics reported last year on how King cheered on domestic terrorist Willem Van Spronsen, who died attacking an ICE facility and released a pro-ANTIFA manifesto…

Since the heart-attack death of serial felon George Floyd in May during an encounter with Minneapolis police, King has fanned the flames of racial tensions. The result is cities set ablaze nationwide by mobs of savages demanding welfare and an end to law enforcement…

Until BLM is classified as a terrorist group and organizers like King are sent to Guantanamo Bay, Western Civilization will remain in jeopardy of collapsing.

 

Free Speech

Does the Arizona Constitution Provide Means for Lawmakers to Crack Down on Big Tech Censorship?

Does the Arizona Constitution provide protections from Big Tech?

Published

on

The Arizona Constitution provides stronger protections for freedom of speech than the First Amendment does, potentially providing legislative solutions to Big Tech censorship in the state at a moment where political censorship is more pervasive than ever.

Article 2 Section 6, Arizona Constitution states that “Every person may freely speak, write, and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right. “

This differs greatly from the federal constitution in that it doesn’t limit the powers of a legislature to restrict freedom of speech. The US Constitution identifies “Congress” as the body it’s restricting from making a law abridging the freedom of speech.

The speech rights established by the Arizona Constitution are thus expressed positively; recognizing a right belonging to the people, as opposed to negating an infringement of said right.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024?

  • POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Quite obviously, the Arizona Constitution was written in an 1910, an era in which the internet would’ve been just as inconceivable as it was in 1789.

In a 2019 Arizona Supreme Court case, the state’s highest court recognized in a 4-3 judgement that the Arizona Constitution provided greater protections than the federal constitution. The case recognized that violations of the First Amendment would represent de facto violations of the

It’s not outside the realm of possibility that the Arizona Attorney General, or state legislature, could hold Big Tech oligarchs to account for violating the Article 2 Section 6 rights of Arizona citizens- especially in a context the major platforms are collectively adjudicated to be acting as a trust in order to suppress competition and silence lawful speech.

Three Arizona legislators called upon Attorney General Mark Brnovich to begin an antitrust investigation into Big Tech oligarchs following the coordinated deplatforming operation against Parler, in which both Amazon and Apple colluded to restrict the free speech platform from the internet.

In an era where the overwhelming majority of free speech is communicated online, the censorious actions of Big Tech very plausibly represent an assault of the right of free expression guaranteed in the Arizona Constitution. Both chambers of Arizona’s legislature remain Republican, even as the state has become purple, and action against Big Tech censorship on the state level could become a real possibility in the coming years.


Follow me on Gab @WildmanAZ, Twitter @Wildman_AZ, and on Parler @Moorhead.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending