Big League National Security
NeoCon Bill Kristol Calls for Regime Change in China
Friday, Bill Kristol laid his cards on the table and called for regime change in China, the world’s most populous nation.
“Shouldn’t an important U.S. foreign policy goal of the next couple of decades be regime change in China?” he said on Twitter.
Shouldn’t an important U.S. foreign policy goal of the next couple of decades be regime change in China? https://t.co/TpFODNTwQZ
— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) November 23, 2018
Trending: ILHAN’S DISTRICT: 17-Year-Old GOP Volunteer Shot Dead Outside of Gas Station in Minneapolis
One of the motivating factors for President Donald J. Trump voting Republicans was to put an end to NeoConservative foreign policy, which has mandated for decades that America make the rest of the world “free,” or in the case of Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, at least turn them over to radical terrorists. Though Trump has yet to exit the Middle East -which he should do immediately – he has not attempted to depose a foreign dictator for the simple fact that the country in question is not a constitutional republic like ours, or that the military industrial complex demands it.
Kristol, whose relevance ends when he logs out of Twitter, was roundly rejected by sane people who would prefer that their sons not die freeing the Chinese. But he stood his ground. In Kristol’s mind, America must deploy troops one way or another.
“A short thread on regime change Yesterday I asked “Shouldn’t an important U.S. foreign policy goal of the next couple of decades be regime change in China?” The question implies that I think the right answer is Yes. I gather there’s been a bit of a reaction to this suggestion,” he said.
“I’m glad to have stimulated some debate, and I hope some re-thinking. I’ll put my position simply. The case for regime change shouldn’t really be controversial. The U.S. at its best has always stood for the proposition that all people everywhere deserve to be free,” he continued.
2. I'm glad to have stimulated some debate, and I hope some re-thinking. I'll put my position simply. The case for regime change shouldn't really be controversial. The U.S. at its best has always stood for the proposition that all people everywhere deserve to be free.
— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) November 24, 2018
And who is going to die to free these people? The sons and daughters of ordinary middle Americans. Not Kristol and his cosmopolitan elite friends. Not their family members. Not their friends Yours.
NeoCon foreign policy always kills everyone but NeoCons.
Big League National Security
NEW: Joe Biden Bashes Incoming Trump Administration In Leaked 2016 Call to President of Ukraine
Completely inappropriate.
Joe Biden speaks in critical and partisan terms of the incoming Trump administration in a new leaked call to the President of Ukraine unveiled Wednesday.
In the call, conducted in November 2016 a week after then-candidate Trump’s election victory, Biden bashes the incoming administration to the foreign leader, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko. Biden assails the Trump transition team as incompetent, turning down the idea of visiting the country before the January transition before Trump is “fully briefed” on matters related to Ukraine.
In a second call, Biden asks for Poroshenko to describe his conversations with incoming President Trump, going to to speak of Trump in more dismissive terms. He describes Trump as a “dog who caught the car, and who doesn’t know what to do.” Not quite a “dog-faced pony soldier,” but definitely not an appropriate way for an outgoing vice president to describe an incoming president to a foreign leader.
A Ukrainian comedian originally released the calls, suggesting questionable operational security within the conversations of Joe Biden and Poroshenko. Biden has a lengthy history of ethical questions regarding his relationship with Ukraine, including looking the other way as his son Hunter secured an extremely lucrative position at a Ukrainian oil company without any experience whatsoever in the energy industry.
Biden himself would later go on to demand the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating corruption allegations against the younger Biden, a clear conflict of interest Biden merely dismissed when he spoke openly of securing the prosecutor’s firing at a Council on Foreign Relations public event.
This is a totally inappropriate way for a Vice President to speak to a foreign leader, and the public should be concerned about how Biden plans to conduct diplomacy should he be elected President.
-
Crime3 days agoILHAN’S DISTRICT: 17-Year-Old GOP Volunteer Shot Dead Outside of Gas Station in Minneapolis
-
News3 days agoOUTRAGEOUS: Milwaukee Man Who was Defending His Home from a Leftist Mob is Arrested
-
Campaign 20203 days agoVOTE STEAL: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules to Count Mail-in Votes Submitted After Election Day
-
States3 days agoEMAIL LEAK: Nashville Dem Mayor’s Office Colludes to Hide Data Indicating Restaurants and Bars Were Not COVID-19 Hotspots
-
Immigration3 days agoNew Jersey IT Company Busted for Exploiting H-1B Cheap Labor Program, Must Pay $350,000 In Restitution
-
Sex Crime3 days agoNetflix ‘Cheer’ Star, Joe Biden Surrogate Charged With Producing Child Pornography After Federal Raid
-
Campaign 20202 days agoRomney, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski Emerge as Republican Red Flags in Potential SCOTUS Confirmation
-
News3 days agoWeak Senator Mitt Romney Attacks GOP’s Investigation On Sleepy Joe’s Corruption
