Connect with us

Border Security

NEVER SEPARATED: Illegal Alien Child Featured On TIME Cover Did Not Leave Mother

Published

on

Open borders activists have been using family separations at the border to propel their push for looser immigration laws. But in their push, they have been spotted on numerous occasions pushing blatant falsehoods, with a recent image that made its way to the cover of TIME Magazine being perhaps the most glaring.

Trending: As Coronavirus Panic Spreads, Bill Gates Talks Up ‘Digital Certificates’ to Enforce Mandatory Vaccines

The title of TIME’s magazine is “Welcome to America,” and it’s message is clear: the Trump Administrations policy of following the law cruel and immoral. While they clearly have their right to that opinion, it doesn’t help their case to include the photo of a child that wasn’t actually separated from her family at the border, but was instead detained with her mother who is still with her. Not only that, but the father of the child is happy that they were stopped at t he border and are safe in the custody of U.S. border authorities.

take our poll - story continues below

Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump?

  • Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

A rudimentary level of journalism could have uncovered this, something that TIME Magazine seems to not care about. Thankfully, Daily Mail did some digging, eventually talking to the pictured child’s father, Denis Javier Varela Hernandez, who lives in Puerto Cortes, Honduras. Hernandez spoke about how he hadn’t seen either his child or wife for three weeks until he saw the now famous photos.

Hernandez stated that both his wife, Sandra, and daughter Yanela Denise are safe. Hernandez was aware of his wife’s intention of moving to the United States, but was not supporting, stating “I didn’t support it. I asked her, why? Why would she want to put our little girl through that?”

He didn’t support it because it was dangerous, illegal, and she wasn’t seeking asylum. His wife was looking for a job.

Despite this fact, TIME Magazine does not appear to have made any effort to make note of the fact that the child they are headlining to gain sympathy against enforcing immigration laws wasn’t actually separated from her mother. But that doesn’t come as much of a surprise, the fact that TIME Magazine has talked about almost nothing else besides how evil the United States is for wanting to enforce immigration laws shows they have an agenda.

As conservative commentator Ann Coulter pointed out, using these children as political props is nothing more than a “political movement to transform our country into Mexico.” The ends seemingly justify the means when it comes to achieving that for the left.

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Have a hot tip for Big League Politics?

Got a hot news tip for us? Photos or video of a breaking story? Send your tips, photos and videos to tips@bigleaguepolitics.com. All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff.

Have something to say? Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions@bigleaguepolitics.com.

Border Security

Coronavirus Stimulus Contains Whopping $350 Million Refugee Resettlement Boondoggle

This has nothing to do with the virus, or the economy.

Published

on

It appears that a $350 million dollar appropriation for purposes of “Migration and Refugee Assistance” managed to slip inside the coronavirus stimulus package.

Populist commentator Ryan Girdusky first reported on the hidden boondoggle as the legislation was being prepared for a Senate vote Wednesday night. It’s one of several unrelated pork planks in the massive $2 trillion stimulus that was able to slip in without the scrutiny of Republican senators.

take our poll - story continues below

Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump?

  • Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The proposal to enrich refugee resettlement contractors appears to have migrated into the legislation originally introduced by Mitch McConnell from Nancy Pelosi’s rivaling proposal. The Speaker of the House had temporarily derailed the stimulus package by introducing a plan of her own, but from the looks of it, she’s getting a crucial element of the left-wing social agenda Democrats have tried to tie to the stimulus with the refugee resettlement package.

Florida’s Matt Gaetz appears to be one of the few members of Congress to question the totally unrelated refugee giveaway in the moment of legislative urgency.

Nominal charitable and non-profit entities have gamed and rigged the American refugee resettlement process for years, enriching themselves to the tunes of tens of millions of dollars if not more on the taxpayer dime. Migration skeptics have long questioned the utility of such an arrangement, pointing out that spending hundreds millions of dollars to resettle people in the United States could be used to far greater effect in providing relief for displaced peoples closer to their homes countries.

Existing refugee resettlement programs have continued in spite of the raging coronavirus pandemic. More than 3,000 people have been resettled in the United States since January, when the disease began surfacing on the radar of the federal government.

The Washington D.C. Swamp appears to have succeeded in utilizing one of its oldest cards in this instance, attaching a totally unrelated refugee proposal to a sorely needed economic relief package. It’s likely the proposal would have shot down on other circumstances, but congressional Democrats ultimately proved tactful enough to advance their preferred and entirely unrelated special interest in a moment of great legislative urgency.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending