Connect with us

Deep State

New Witness Emerges In Mueller-Linked Scooter Libby Set-Up

Published

on

A prominent Washington DC attorney who writes a weekly column for a popular conservative blog, Clarice Feldman, recently dropped a bombshell on JustOneMinute, a website known for its coverage of the Plamegate hoax, which occurred during Robert Mueller’s tenure as FBI director.

Feldman claimed to know someone who witnessed Marc Grossman outing Valerie Plame.

In response to an article published on BigLeaguePolitics.com (How Mueller Has Been Silending Whistleblowers To Set Up Fake Special Counsels For Years) Feldman was called to question her on her claim that she knew a witness, and she stated the following:

Trending: Authors of Pro-Hydroxychloroquine Study Defend Their Work After Being Attacked by Dr. Fauci

1) A Turkish businesswoman witnessed Marc Grossman outing Valerie Plame as a CIA employee at a Turkish embassy dinner during Grossman’s tenor as Ambassador to Turkey (1995 – 1997).

take our poll - story continues below

RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

2) That she (Feldman) was in contact with “this women.”

3) That she (Feldman) talked to Lewis “Scooter” Libby (Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff) about the woman’s offer to testify at his trial but Libby decided that the fact that Grossman outed Plame years prior to the start of the Plamegate hoax was irrelevant. And, he declined the witness’ offer to testify.

Irrelevant? Really?

What could be more relevant than exposing Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald’s star witness as the person who exposed Plame years prior to the beginning of the Plamegate hoax?

In other words, what could be more relevant than exposing the duplicitous tactics of the Deep State?

After all, the very same people who perpetrated the Plamegate hoax are now using those same tactics in their new hoax, Russiagate!

Related: EXCLUSIVE: How Deep State ‘Journalist’ Michael Isikoff Has Been Setting Up Mueller’s Enemies For Years

Feldman’s witness was not the only one who offered to testify on Libby’s behalf.

FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds also went to Libby with an offer to testify that Fitzgerald’s star witness, Marc Grossman, was the person who actually outed Plame, and that the FBI and the DoJ knew this long before Robert Novak wrote his now famous article that set into motion the Plamegate fiasco.

(Grossman testimony begins at 6 minute mark)

So with two solid witnesses willing to testify for Libby that Plamegate was a hoax, Americans deserve answers to the following:

Why did Scooter Libby decide against exposing Mueller, Comey and Fitzgerald as frauds back then?

And, why is he not exposing them now?

Help us out here, Scooter. Speak up!

 

Deep State

Federal Court to Re-Examine Michael Flynn’s Case After Request From Democrat-Appointed Judge

This seems highly improper.

Published

on

U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan is trying to revive the federal case against General Michael Flynn weeks after it was officially dismissed.

According to the Washington Post, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has decided to revisit the Department of Justice’s decision to drop the case at Sullivan’s behest. Sullivan has been on a crusade against Flynn for months, which Flynn’s attorneys claim is politically motivated. He was appointed to the bench by former President Bill Clinton.

“The district court has hijacked and extended a criminal prosecution for almost three months for its own purposes,” Flynn attorneys Sidney Powell and Jesse Binnall told the court.

“To allow Judge Sullivan to delay and generate litigation against a criminal defendant is unconstitutional,” they added, because the “Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case.”

take our poll - story continues below

RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Sullivan has failed in other attempts to keep the case going, which have included appealing to a retired federal judge and retaining a high-profile trial lawyer. He has let his objectivity slip with his aggressive lobbying campaign against Flynn, who was able to narrowly escape the deep state railroading against him.

Big League Politics has reported on how the feds collaborated to set up Gen. Flynn over the course of their phony Russia-gate investigation:

New unsealed FBI notes on the planned interrogation of Michael Flynn suggest a questionable intent to the investigation of the then-White House National Security Advisor and retired general.

The notes, which preceded the January 24th, 2017 interview of Flynn, suggest the investigating FBI agents were more interested in tripping up Flynn in a lie than in genuinely investigating the National Security Advisor’s negotiations with Russia during the White House transition period preceding President Donald Trump’s inauguration.

Additional notes on the matter suggest that the FBI agents involved in the case were cautious of White House oversight…

FBI agents question openly if they’re trying to investigate Flynn for negotiating potential sanctions relief with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, or if they’re simply trying to trip him up in a lie for them to charge him with. Flynn was ultimately forced to resign as White House National Security Advisor and charged with lying to the FBI as a result of the January 2017 interview.

Flynn has merely been charged with process crimes. He was never charged with violations of the Logan Act, which restricts civilians from negotiating with foreign governments on behalf of the United States without authorization.

The retired general recently announced he’d seek to change his guilty plea to the charges to not guilty, citing a legal team that shoehorned him into making the plea. If so, Flynn could potentially bring up the questionable FBI game plan going into his interview as an argument for the agency’s impropriety in investigating him.

The deep state is obviously bitter that their plan to destroy Flynn’s life failed. Sullivan should be impeached, or worse, for abusing his power so brazenly.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending