New York City is attempting to criminalize using the phrase “illegal alien” in a new vaguely worded, reaching and anti-First Amendment municipal law.
A new 29-page order released by the city’s Commission on Human Rights specifies fines of $250,000 per offense for using the phrase in a manner deemed to be “hateful” by city bureaucrats.
“Alien’ — used in many laws to refer to a ‘noncitizen’ person — is a term that may carry negative connotations and dehumanize immigrants, marking them as ‘other.’ The use of certain language, including ‘illegal alien’ and ‘illegals,’ with the intent to demean, humiliate, or offend a person or persons constitutes discrimination.”
United States code refers to individuals who lack valid legal authorization to be in the country as illegal aliens. It’s totally appropriate to refer to those who immigrate illegally as illegal aliens, despite a consistent from the left over the past decade to brand immigration law violators as “undocumented immigrants.”
New York City’s law mainly extends to employers, the city’s guidelines describing potential violations in which an employer questions the legal status of his employees. It would be much more difficult for city PC police to persecute ordinary citizens for simply using the commonly used phrase “illegal aliens,” although city hall’s directive makes it unclear if they’re intending to do so.
The city’s commission on human rights is phrasing their unprecedented attack on free speech as a reactionary measure in response to immigration patriots and operations of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in the city. The city also recently established a $1 million grant for illegals fighting deportation proceedings in court.
As New York City’s progressive masters roll out the red carpets for those who break America’s immigration law, it appears they take a far more vindictive approach towards actual Americans who might be less than thrilled with mass illegal immigration.
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
President Trump Rejects Paying For Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Private Security
The royal celebrities will foot the bill.
President Trump made it clear on a Sunday tweet that British royals Prince Harry and Meghan Markle would have to pay for their own security costs upon moving full-time to the United States, clarifying that they wouldn’t receive federal security under an existing arrangement that covers British royals temporarily visiting the US.
I am a great friend and admirer of the Queen & the United Kingdom. It was reported that Harry and Meghan, who left the Kingdom, would reside permanently in Canada. Now they have left Canada for the U.S. however, the U.S. will not pay for their security protection. They must pay!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 29, 2020
The royal celebrities have distanced themselves from the Queen, apparently viewing themselves as victims of relentless paparazzi and media attention.
Harry and Markle initially moved to Canada after resigning from the royal family, but they’ve recently moved to Hollywood just before the Canadian border was closed to nonessential travel due to the Chinese coronavirus epidemic. The elitist couple apparently plans on reinventing themselves as American-style celebrities, and have hired a small army of media consultants and public relations agents to market their image.
When information of their move to Los Angeles became public knowledge, many began to speculate if they’d recieve taxpayer-funded security in a manner akin to British royals visiting the United States on official state vists. President Trump’s Sunday tweet appears to eliminate that possibility.
The thirteen colonies that became the United States rebelled against the yoke of the British monarchy for a reason. President Trump’s decision to cut off the wannabee celebrities from publicly-funded security is a deeply American decision. The UK’s monarchy is one of the wealthiest legacy institutions in the western world, and it would be absurd to imagine that it can’t afford to hire private security for the ‘former’ royals, who are set to fully renounce their royal obligations at the end of the month.
Trending on BLP
Deep State3 days ago
ACCOUNTABILITY: President Trump Fires Deep State Snitch Who Triggered Impeachment Hysteria
Tech3 days ago
Banished Journalist Laura Loomer’s $1.5 Billion Lawsuit Against Tech Giants Will Be Heard in Court
Big League Wellness4 days ago
Expert Warns That Fears of Chinese Coronavirus Being a Bioweapon Should Not Be Dismissed
Big League Wellness2 days ago
Dr. Anthony Fauci Plotted ‘Global Vaccine Action Plan’ with Bill Gates Before Pushing COVID Panic and Doubts About Hydroxychloroquine Treatments
Big League Economics3 days ago
This Wall Street Firm Has Quietly Gained Control Over the Financial Sector During Coronavirus Panic
Campaign 20203 days ago
Joe Rogan Endorses Donald Trump Over Joe Biden, Citing Cognitive Decline
Big League Wellness2 days ago
New York Storefronts Boarded Up as Burglaries Rise 75%
News4 days ago
Woke Leftists Upset Over Christian Organzation Setting Up Hospital for Coronavirus Patients