Connect with us

Snowflakes

New York Lt. Gov. Whines about President Trump’s Posthumous Pardon of Susan B. Anthony

It might be that time of the month for NY Lt. Gov. Kathy Hochul.

Published

1 month ago

on

After President Donald Trump’s announced he would be issuing a gracious posthumous pardon of women’s suffrage pioneer Susan B. Anthony, New York Lt. Gov. Kathy Hochul became triggered by Trump’s move to honor an American hero.

“I was deeply troubled to learn that Trump went ahead and treated her like a criminal,” Hochul said. “Susan B. Anthony was guilty of nothing.”

Hochul is apparently missing the point that Trump’s pardon indicates that Anthony was guilty of nothing and corrected the record that previously said she was guilty of a crime. Hochul did not let logic and common sense get in the way of her cheap partisan attempt to score points with her base of rabid Trump haters.

She even gave a speech in front of the Susan B. Anthony House in order to grandstand.

“Later today, I will be signing a full and complete pardon for Susan B. Anthony. She was never pardoned. Did you know that? She was never pardoned,” the president said on Tuesday, adding that the move is “fantastic.”

Anthony was once convicted of voting illegally in the 1872 presidential election, years before the 19th Amendment was enacted to put universal suffrage into place. He is issuing this pardon on the 100 year anniversary of the ratification of the 19th Amendment.

“She was guilty for voting. And we are going to be signing a full and complete pardon,” Trump said.

Anthony committed civil disobedience nearly 150 years ago that would go on to change the trajectory of the country. She was charged along with 14 other women for illegal voting in New York. She demanded no special treatment – true equality, rather than the special treatment demanded by third-wave feminists – as she was brought in by authorities.

Before her trial, Anthony was busy politicking for her cause. She traveled to 29 cities across the state to deliver her iconic speech: “Is it a crime for a US citizen to vote?”

“It was we the people, not we the white, male citizens, nor yet we male citizens, but we the whole people, who formed this Union,” she said in her speech.

She was eventually convicted of illegal voting, and fined $100, which she said was the “greatest judicial outrage history has ever recorded.” Anthony told the judge she would “never pay a dollar,” and there are no records of her ever paying the unjust fine.

“Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God,” Anthony said. Trump has made it clear that Anthony was no criminal for disobeying unjust government policy.

President Trump has also made electoral integrity one of his primary focuses during his re-election campaign, as Democrats push to expand the mail-in voting system that opens the door for a plethora of fraud.

“We have to have honest voting,” Trump said during today’s press conference. “That’s what this is all about here. We have to have honest voting.”

Today, Susan B. Anthony shines down from heaven and smiles upon the president as he protects the vote for millions of women nationwide.

ANTIFA

SICK: University of Rhode Island Professor Erik Loomis Believes There’s “Nothing Wrong” With Murder of Aaron Danielson

Why is he still teaching?

Published

2 weeks ago

on

Sep 10, 2020

By

A University of Rhode Island professor argued that there is “nothing wrong” with the murder of Portland conservative demonstrator Jay Danielson last month on his personal blog. Danielson, a Patriot Prayer demonstator, was murdered by “100% ANTIFA” militant Michael Reinoehl. Reinoehl admitted to the murder shortly before being killed by US Marshals, who sought to apprehend the homicide suspect when he wielded an assault rifle.

Loomis,who identifies himself as a historian on Twitter, rebutted an argument citing that Reinoehl admitted to murdering Danielson. On a blog comment, he wrote, “he killed a fascist. I see nothing wrong with it, at least from a moral perspective.”

He went on to elaborate in his defense of the murder in a later blog comment.

“Yes, sometimes violence is necessary, say to avoid greater physical harm, i.e. self-defense, or to defeat a literal army of fascists who are trying to kill people. But, ideologically, I think the idea that violence is good if it’s against our political enemies is a core part of fascism, and so the ideological opposition to that idea should be its opposite – that violence as a general rule is bad, unless the specific context of that situation requires a violent response.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Reinoehl laid in wait in a Portland parking lot to ambush and murder Aaron Danielson during a Patriot Prayer caravan through the city, chambering a handgun before he even approached Danielson. He was charged with second-degree murder in the killing, although his death at the hands of law enforcement serving his arrest warrant ensures he won’t face a trial for his actions.

Loomis has gone on to accost anyone who challenges his endorsement of the murder as a “fascist.”

Sick, violent leftist.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending

 
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a Big League Politics insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.