Connect with us

Fake News Media

New York Times Endorses Democrat Party Presidential Contender…For The 16th Consecutive Election!

The fake news is incredibly biased.

Published

on

The New York Times announced its presidential endorsement this weekend, putting the weight of the failing fake news rag behind two female Democrat contenders – Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Sen. Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren of Massachusetts.

The editorial board of the Times made the decision with two weeks to go before the Iowa caucus. They interviewed the nine top candidates over the past month before ultimately making their decision.

“There are legitimate questions about whether our democratic system is fundamentally broken. Our elections are getting less free and fair, Congress and the courts are increasingly partisan, foreign nations are flooding society with misinformation, a deluge of money flows through our politics. And the economic mobility that made the American dream possible is vanishing,” the Times ed board wrote.

Trending: Homosexual Cop Gets $10 Million Taxpayer Payout Because He Did Not Receive a Promotion

“Both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration. If there were ever a time to be open to new ideas, it is now. If there were ever a time to seek stability, now is it,” they added. “That’s why we’re endorsing the most effective advocates for each approach. They are Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar.”

take our poll - story continues below

Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The Times extolled Warren as a “gifted storyteller” due to her ability to speak “elegantly of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans.” They added that her “path to the nomination is challenging, but not hard to envision,” which isn’t something they could say about Klobuchar – who is an afterthought that has stayed at the bottom of the polls.

Regarding Klobuchar, the Times called her “a standard-bearer for the Democratic center.” They surmised that “the best chance to enact progressive plans could be under a Klobuchar administration” because she could unite the moderate and progressive wings of the party. Even though Klobuchar is notorious for treating her staff in a demeaning, undignified manner, they claim she “has acknowledged she’s a tough boss and pledged to do better.”

While the Times will act like their presidential endorsement matters, it is in actuality little more than a rubber-stamp for who they believe is the top Democrat contender. They have now endorsed a Democrat for President for a stunning 16 straight election cycles with their picks of Klobuchar and Warren.

“Ms. Klobuchar and Ms. Warren right now are the Democrats best equipped to lead that debate,” the Times concluded. “May the best woman win.”

Unfortunately for the corporate-bought Times, the far-left socialist candidate is rising in the polls despite their best efforts to stifle him. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) may be the nominee, and then the Democrats will have to run a communist in the hopes of defeating the President in this November’s election. Things are not boding well for the Democrat Party establishment as liberals radicalize in the age of Trump.

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Have a hot tip for Big League Politics?

Got a hot news tip for us? Photos or video of a breaking story? Send your tips, photos and videos to tips@bigleaguepolitics.com. All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff.

Have something to say? Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions@bigleaguepolitics.com.

You Might Like

Fake News Media

Liberal Media Freaks Out as Tom Cotton Questions Coronavirus Origins

Mainstream media seems more concerned with Cotton’s questions than China’s censorship.

Published

on

Mainstream media entities are claiming Republican Senator Tom Cotton is trafficking in “conspiracy theories” for questioning the source of the coronavirus’ origins.

Cotton has questioned the official narrative stating that the deadly coronavirus outbreak originated in a wet food market in Wuhan, China. He’s suggested that it’s possible the disease originated in a Chinese government “superlab” a few miles away that conducts research in human infectious diseases.

Cotton has pointed out that the Chinese government is consistently declining offers of scientific and medical aid to combat the lethal epidemic, raising suspicions as to their transparency.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Such a suggestion is enough to label Cotton a “conspiracy theorist” in the eyes of outlets such as Slate and the New York Times. A headline from the Times called Cotton’s question a “fringe theory,” even though Cotton references epidemiologists who believe the virus didn’t originally enter human transmission at the food market. The Washington Post also ran a story Monday claiming that Cotton is trafficking in conspiracy theories.

It’s remarkable that nominally respectable media entities such as the New York Times are quick to dismiss entirely plausible theories of the coronavirus’s origins. If anything, an official narrative on the virus’s origins from the authoritarian communist government of China should be treated with inherent skepticism, especially considering that China is widely suspected of covering up the gravity of the situation and even arresting reporters who seek to document the epidemic and the government’s response.

Certainly it’s possible that the disease spread into humans from the consumption of animals such as bats, a prevailing theory for the virus’s origins. But the general public has no reason to entirely discount any plausible theory for the origins of the virus.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


You Might Like

Trending