Connect with us

Snowflakes

NO EXCUSE NOW: Nancy Pelosi Wins Speaker, But Is Still Losing ‘Let’s Make A Deal’

Published

on

President Donald Trump gained even more collateral over Nancy Pelosi after the 78-year old Californian won her speakership election Thursday. Pelosi is still holding out on the $5 billion that Art of the Deal author President Donald Trump is demanding for his Wall, prompting a government shutdown that has reached thirteen days (but it hasn’t exactly been as dramatic as the Cuban Missile Crisis). Pelosi’s fatuous bills that don’t fund the Wall have no chance of being introduced in the Senate, according to Mitch McConnell’s spokesman.

Pelosi has no excuse now for holding out: she can no longer pitch the narrative that she is just trying to protect her position. So now, her opposition to the Wall very clearly stems from the place it has always stemmed from: the fact that she has no power in the globalist system and the progressive billionaires dictate her agenda.

How’s that for a talking point?

Trending: Nebraska Small Business Owner Commits Suicide After Being Railroaded With Manslaughter For Defending His Bar From Criminal Rioters

ANTIFA

SICK: University of Rhode Island Professor Erik Loomis Believes There’s “Nothing Wrong” With Murder of Aaron Danielson

Why is he still teaching?

Published

on

A University of Rhode Island professor argued that there is “nothing wrong” with the murder of Portland conservative demonstrator Jay Danielson last month on his personal blog. Danielson, a Patriot Prayer demonstator, was murdered by “100% ANTIFA” militant Michael Reinoehl. Reinoehl admitted to the murder shortly before being killed by US Marshals, who sought to apprehend the homicide suspect when he wielded an assault rifle.

Loomis,who identifies himself as a historian on Twitter, rebutted an argument citing that Reinoehl admitted to murdering Danielson. On a blog comment, he wrote, “he killed a fascist. I see nothing wrong with it, at least from a moral perspective.

He went on to elaborate in his defense of the murder in a later blog comment.

Yes, sometimes violence is necessary, say to avoid greater physical harm, i.e. self-defense, or to defeat a literal army of fascists who are trying to kill people. But, ideologically, I think the idea that violence is good if it’s against our political enemies is a core part of fascism, and so the ideological opposition to that idea should be its opposite – that violence as a general rule is bad, unless the specific context of that situation requires a violent response.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Reinoehl laid in wait in a Portland parking lot to ambush and murder Aaron Danielson during a Patriot Prayer caravan through the city, chambering a handgun before he even approached Danielson. He was charged with second-degree murder in the killing, although his death at the hands of law enforcement serving his arrest warrant ensures he won’t face a trial for his actions.

Loomis has gone on to accost anyone who challenges his endorsement of the murder as a “fascist.”

Sick, violent leftist.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending