President Barack Obama personally authorized the release of ten Russian spies who spent years in the United States infiltrating elite academic and Wall Street institutions, including one spy who received a degree from Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government.
President Obama held an Oval Office meeting on January 5, 2017, at the very end of his term after President Trump had been elected, in which he advised withholding information about the federal government’s “Russia” probe into Trump from Trump’s advisers.
Obama’s purported concern about Russian meddling was a stark 180-degree turn from his previous actions as president.
In a mostly forgotten incident from Obama’s first term, the president acted with “unprecedented” swiftness in releasing ten arrested Russian spies in a bid to underscore the Democratic administration’s newfound diplomatic progress with Russia. In exchange, Russia agreed to release four of their own nationals from imprisonment for “illegal contacts with the West,” according to the Washington Post.
“President Obama has not spoken to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev about the spy swap but has been “fully briefed and engaged in the matter,” the administration official said. “It did come to the [U.S.] president for his authorization. And he gave it”…
The hearing brought an abrupt conclusion to one of the more unusual spy cases in U.S. history. The 10 agents — and a suspect still at large after disappearing in Cyprus — were “sleepers” whose job was to blend in at high-powered institutions such as Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government or in Manhattan financial circles, officials said.
Their mission was to gather information and identify potential future government employees who could be helpful, officials said…”
But don’t worry, folks. At least the long-embedded Russian spy had to give back his degree from Harvard.
“Harvard Kennedy School has revoked the degree it awarded Russian spy Andrey Bezrukov, who lived in Cambridge and attended school under the name of Donald H. Heathfield…
Under the name of Heathfield, a deceased Canadian, Bezrukov studied at the Kennedy School and graduated from the Master’s in Public Administration program in 2000…
According to the most recent version of its student handbook, the Kennedy School usually severs its relationship with a student when it is discovered that the individual’s application contains inaccuracies.”
That man’s application evidently contained quite a few inaccuracies.
Bezrukov was more than willing to dish on his covert spy work in a 2012 Russian-language interview with the Russky Reporter magazine, in which he explained that his wife was also a Russian spy.
“You know, intelligence does not work against specific people. It’s not permanent and assignments can change. As a secret agent, you work for the good of your country. Crimes may be committed against specific people, but intelligence is a patriotic business,” Bezrukov said.
“They were my main object of study,” Bezrukov said of Americans. “It is a country that you must know; you want to understand its people in order to help your country’s leaders make the right decisions.”
“Yes, knowledge and understanding are often crucial. I would put it this way: in order to win, you have to understand, and in order to understand, you have to love. That is, you have to come to love the country in which you work,” Bezrukov added.
But Bezrukov was quick to point out that he did not actually love America.
“I can’t say that I fell in love with the country. I have lived in countries that are culturally more interesting than the United States. But, of course, I respect the Americans. There are many things that I like about them: their optimism, ingenuity, readiness for change, the ability to honestly and promptly admit to and correct their mistakes,” the spy said.
How surprising that he fit right in, undetected, at Harvard!
The spy couple’s children later dished to The Guardian in a tell-all piece headlined “The day we discovered our parents were Russian spies.”
Even the Washington Post acknowledged that Obama let the spies go very quickly and easily.
“John L. Martin, who supervised dozens of espionage cases during a 26-year career at the Justice Department, said earlier spy exchanges took years to work out. The speed at which the latest one occurred was “absolutely unprecedented,” he said.
Indeed, the swap could feed Republican criticism that the Obama administration is too accommodating toward Russia.
Obama administration officials said the deal illustrated the good working relationship between the former Cold War enemies…”
So, there you have it. Russian spies were infiltrating the Ivy League and Manhattan’s upper-crust finance crowds, but Obama let them go become celebrities back in Russia in order to highlight his excellent relationship with Russia.
Obama and Hillary Clinton are both under fire for the Uranium One scandal, in which they sold 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Vladimir Putin’s Russia with the assistance of Robert Mueller, currently special counsel probing alleged Trump-Russian connections.
“An FBI informant with first hand experience in the Uranium One deal testified to congress that Moscow paid millions of dollars to a U.S. lobbying firm in order to influence then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by helping Bill Clinton’s charities during the Obama administration.
The informant, Douglas Campbell, gave a ten-page statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee, House Intelligence Committee, and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, as well as being interviewed for several hours by committee staff.”
But despite all of this Russia love, the Obama administration all of a sudden grew concerned about the Russkies as soon as President Trump got elected.
It doesn’t take a degree from the Kennedy School to figure this one out.
Rand Paul Warns Third Party Will Rise if Republican Senators Vote with Democrats to Convict President Trump
The GOP is crumbling.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) is warning that at least one-third of GOP senators will revolt and leave the party if Republicans join Democrats to convict the president.
This would potentially create the most viable third party in recent political history if Republican leadership is foolish enough to go down this path. Even though he refused to oppose the vote steal last week, Paul claims he and many of his colleagues intend to leave the party forever if the Senate goes through with impeachment.
“I didn’t agree with the fight that happened last week. I voted against over-turning the election,” Paul said while appearing on FOX News on Friday night. “But at the same time, the impeachment is a wrongheaded, partisan notion. If Republicans go along with it, it will destroy the party. A third of the Republicans will leave the party.”
“A third of the Republicans will leave the party,” Paul added. “This isn’t about, anymore, about the Electoral College, it’s about the future of the party, and whether you’re going to ostracize and excommunicate President Trump from the party. Well, guess what? Millions of his fans will leave as well.”
Paul made these responses after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) publicly flirted with the idea of voting to convict President Trump.
“I have not made a final decision on how I will vote and I intend to listen to the legal arguments when they are presented to the Senate,” McConnell said.
Paul is putting McConnell and the rest of the GOP leadership on notice. This is the line in the sand as far as he is concerned.
“They will destroy the Republican Party. If leadership is complicit with an impeachment or if leadership votes for an impeachment, they will destroy the party,” Paul said.
“Like I say, I have opposed President Trump when I thought he was wrong, I’ve been for him when he was right. We did a lot of good things throughout the Trump presidency, and impeachment is purely a partisan thing,” he added.
The full segment with Paul and host Laura Ingraham can be seen here:
Big League Politics has reported on the division within the GOP since 10 Republican turncoats in the House join Democrats to impeach Trump for a second time:
Liz Cheney, daughter of Dick, was one of ten GOP House members to vote “yes” on President Donald Trump’s unprecedented second impeachment. Then when some were calling on Cheney to resign over her disgraceful vote, Dan Crenshaw, who voted against impeachment, quickly came to her defense and announced his “full support” for her.
“Let’s get some truth on the record: @Liz_Cheney has a hell of a lot more backbone than most, & is a principled leader with a fierce intellect,” Crenshaw tweeted Wednesday afternoon. “She will continue to be a much needed leader in the conference, with my full support.”
“We can disagree without tearing each other apart,” he added…
Cheney’s vote comes as no surprise. Big League Politics reported on her recent statement in support of Trump’s second impeachment, part of which read: “There has never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution. I will vote to impeach the President.” For this CNN laughably called her the “conscience of Republicans.”
The realignment that is happening within the conservative movement might result in the destruction of the Republican Party. President Trump may ultimately destroy the GOP swamp.
Sports4 days ago
National Hockey League Declares War on Trump Supporters? Former Trump Campaign Staffer Reveals Chilling Account of Political Persecution
Violent Left2 days ago
Leftist Thug Targets Roger Stone’s Handicapped Wife for Vicious Attack in Own Neighborhood
Congress3 days ago
Freshman GOP Rep. Nancy Mace Calls for Federal Investigations Against Pro-Trump Lawmakers
Congress3 days ago
Nikki Haley Announces Super PAC to Support Anti-Trump Incumbents with Big Corporate Money
The Swamp3 days ago
Dan Crenshaw White Knights for Liz Cheney After Republicans Blast Her Support for Trump’s Second Impeachment
Free Speech3 days ago
SILENCING TRUMP: Jared Kushner ‘Intervened’ to Stop the President from Joining Gab, Parler
Around The World2 days ago
Ex-Soviet Leader Gorbachev: US Capitol Riot “Planned in Advance, And It Is Clear by Whom”
Tech3 days ago
WEAK EXCUSE: Twitter Oligarch Jack Dorsey Tries to Rationalize Banning Trump, Fails Miserably