Big League National Security
Office of Debbie Wasserman Schultz Uses Voice Changer to Call Law Office Suing DNC
In a shocking court filing, the law firm representing a class action suit by Bernie Sanders supporters against the Democratic National Committee and former chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz alleged that someone from the congresswoman’s office used a voice changer to call and dig for information.
Worst of all, the individual remembered to change their voice — but forgot to block their phone number from appearing on the firm’s caller ID.
In Thursday’s filing, the Beck & Lee firm alleged that “at 4:54 p.m. today, an individual called our law office from ‘305-936-5724.’”
Trending: An America First Patriot is Challenging Dan Crenshaw in Next Year’s GOP Primary. Here’s Why.
“The caller refused to identify himself/herself, but asked my secretary about the Wilding et al. v. DNC et al. lawsuit. My secretary stated that it sounded like the caller was using a voice changer, because the voice sounded robotic and genderless — along the lines of the voice changers used when television show interviews are kept anonymous. The caller concluded with ‘Okey dokey,’ after my secretary gave the caller public information about the case,” the filing continued.
At the end of the call, the firm conducted a Google search of the phone number and found that it belongs to Wasserman Schultz’ office in Aventura.
The law firm provided a photo of the caller ID as well as a screenshot of the phone number listed on the congresswoman’s office website.
“What just occurred is highly irregular and we will be filing the instant e-mail with the court forthwith,” the filing concluded.
The lawsuit, being heard in Florida, is using the leaked internal documents from the DNC in an attempt to prove that the party defrauded voters as they were seeking to undermine Senator Bernie Sanders throughout the primaries.
The DNC has argued that they have no obligation to be fair and impartial towards candidates.
“We could have voluntarily decided that, ‘Look, we’re gonna go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way.’ That’s not the way it was done. But they could have. And that would have also been their right,” Bruce Spiva, a lawyer for the DNC, argued in a motion to dismiss.
The Democratic Party charter says that the party will exercise total neutrality during primaries — but Spiva has claimed that the rules are non-binding.
Big League National Security
Amid a Flurry of Ums and Uhs, AG Nominee Merrick Garland Refuses to Say That Illegal Border Crossings Should Remain a Crime
What a hot mess.
Merrick Garland, who is President Joe Biden’s nomination for attorney general, refused to say that illegal border crossings should remain a crime.
His comments about the border came in response to a question from Sen. Josh Hawley at Garland’s confirmation hearing Monday.
“[I’d like to] talk a little bit more about the law enforcement challenges at the border, which I know a number of other members have brought up with you,” Hawley said. “Just a fundamental question: Do you believe that illegal entry at America’s borders should remain a crime?”
Garland responded as follows: “Well, I haven’t thought about that question. Uh, I just haven’t thought about that question. I think, you know, uh, the president has made clear that we are a country with borders and with a concern about national security. Um, I don’t know of a proposal to, uh, decriminalize but still make it unlawful to enter. I just don’t know the answer to that question. I haven’t thought about it.”
“Will you continue to prosecute unlawful border crossings?” Hawley asked.
“Well, this is again, uh, a question of allocation of resources. Um, we will, uh, the department will, you know, prevent unlawful crossing. Um, I don’t know, you know, uh, I have to admit I just don’t know exactly what the conditions are and how this is done. I think if, um, um, I don’t know what the current program even is with respect to this. Um, so, I, I assume that the answer would be yes but I don’t know what [the conditions are],” Garland said.
Garland’s “hands off” approach to illegal immigration could form a crucial element of Biden’s “America Last” immigration policy, with federal law enforcement resources directed to left-wing policy priorities as waves of caravans infiltrate the porous borders.
-
Congress1 day agoAn America First Patriot is Challenging Dan Crenshaw in Next Year’s GOP Primary. Here’s Why.
-
Big League Guns3 days agoSecond Amendment Patriots Stop Mass Shooting, Take Out Gunman at Louisiana Gun Range
-
Two Americas2 days agoBlack Teen Travels to White Suburb to Commit Mass Shooting, Mainstream Media Remains Silent
-
Crime3 days agoBIZARRE: Biden Recounts Being Arrested After Trespassing in Senate Chamber in Old Video
-
Opinion2 days agoOpinion: CPAC’s Incompetency and Hypocrisy on Full Display in Their Handling of the Young Pharaoh Situation
-
Big League Economics3 days agoGas Prices Have Exploded Since Biden Entered Office
-
Congress2 days agoRINO ALERT? David Perdue Sat on Millions in Campaign Cash as Democrats Took Georgia Senate Seats
-
Campaign 20242 days agoDonald Trump Will Reportedly Claim He’s the “Presumptive 2024 Nominee” in CPAC Speech
