The Oklahoma Senate voted against bringing a controversial anti-abortion bill (SB 13) to the floor. The author of the bill, Senator Joseph Silk, describes the bill as an “equal protection bill,” and it would most noteably classify all abortion as homicide.
In an interview with KOCO News 5 ABC, Silk explained further, saying:
“Senate Bill 13…defines life beginning at the moment of conception, offers those lives equal protection under the law, and therefore classifies any intentional killing of unborn children as homicide….
The medical exception is not explicitly oultined, but…the language of the bill does not prevent a doctor from perfoming basic medical triage. It just says that a physician needs to…treat both lives equally. If he is not able to save both…he will not be charged with murder….”
This bill has obvioulsy been denounced by Oklahoma Democrats with the usual emotional and irrational ‘my body, my choice’ type of objections. There’s no surprise there.
What’s significant about the debate over this bill, though, is that it has put on display the growing divide between mainstream pro-life advocates and abortion abolitionists.
Both of these groups are generally anti-abortion, but there are clear differences in strategy and expediency.
The mainstaream pro-life movement is sticking with the strategy of the last 47 years, pushing the incremental and regulatory approach. Meanwhile, the abolitionists believe that the only just strategy is to outright ban the practice and count unborn humans as equal under law to born humans.
Senate Pro Tem Greg Treat takes the more mainstream approach, so he is in opposition to the bill.
Treat explained his opposition saying, “I agree with abolishing abortion….[and] if I thought that Senate Bill 13 would save a single human life, I would be on board fully.” He believes the bill is “fatally flawed” because it lacks consideration for the Roe vs Wade ruling.
Abolitionists would agree that this bill essentially ignores the Roe vs Wade ruling, but they wouldn’t agree that this makes the bill flawed.
The abolitionists (like Silk) who crafted the bill don’t believe the state should even acknowledge the courts Roe vs Wade ruling due to it’s aburd and unconstitutional basis. They see it being the states responsibility to challenge the court with laws such as this.
This bill and others like it are seeing some traction around the US, with a growing abolitionst movement. This is the second time this particular bill has been considered, after having been rejected a hearing in 2019, as well.
This fight between the mainstream pro-life movement and the abolitionist movement is likely to continue in the coming months and years. So, it shouldn’t be surprising if we see this bill eventually get to the Okalahoma Senate floor.
MSU Provost Goes Politically Correct by Eliminating the Words “Foreign” and “Alien”
In a recent announcement, Michigan State University Provost Teresa Woodruff declared that the university will stop using the terms “foreign” and “alien” to foster a more “inclusive” environment.
The Morning Watch reported that Woodruff said before the Associated Students of MSU (ASMSU) on October 22, that “we will eliminate from our collective lexicon the words ‘alien’ and ‘foreign.’ Instead, we’ve adopted non-pejorative terms that describe geography.”
The new language directed towards international students would now be “non-domestic” or “international,” the provost detailed. Woodruff added that the change will help “create a culture of not us vs. them, but of each other.”
Woodruff revealed that change was made by the MSU Office of the Provost and went through the Dean’s Council, and the federal government was made aware of these changes.
The ASMSU’s International Students Association representative Nikunj Agarwal declared that the language change is an “essential step” and that change in language will help in “making us feel really inclusive in the community.” MSU has been active over the past year in trying to become more politically correct and “inclusive.”
Back in October 2019, MSU made additional changes to appeal to resident aliens by launching a website for “undocumented students, refugees, and recipients of…DACA.” The website listed a number of goals which consisted of “reducing apprehension, addressing confusion, and giving better access to MSU resources.”
MSU’s President Samuel Stanley was especially shook after Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) agents gave a presentation before an MSU class. Stanley likened the the CBP agents’ visit to campus as acts of vandalism and part of the “concern and anger” at the university.
Public universities are making it clear that they don’t care about free speech and are willing to manipulate language for the sake of promoting political correctness. If conservatives aren’t majoring in high demand fields such as STEM, they should give universities the cold shoulder. There’s no need to subsidize institutions that hate you.
Tech4 days ago
Twitter Censors Audio of Detroit Poll Workers Being Trained to Lie to Voters, Destroy Ballots, Stop Challengers
Campaign 20203 days ago
George Soros is Desperately Throwing Money at Minority Voters to Get them to Vote Democrat
Sex Crime3 days ago
Joe Rogan Confirms “Conspiracy Theorist” Alex Jones Was The First One Warning About Jeffrey Epstein
Tech3 days ago
Mailchimp Issues New Terms of Service Banning All ‘Misleading’ Content ‘in Their Sole Discretion’
Campaign 20204 days ago
SEVEN THOUSAND Donald Trump Supporters Take to the Streets of Peoria, Arizona in MAGA Parade
Congress3 days ago
WOW: Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Caught LYING UNDER OATH about Censorship in Senate Testimony
Campaign 20203 days ago
“You All Think I’m Kidding, Don’t You?”: Joe Biden Calls Himself Kamala Harris’ RUNNING MATE
Campaign 20202 days ago
SUCCESS: Michigan Voter Integrity Lawsuit Results in New Directive Empowering Poll Challengers