UPDATE: The error was reportedly on the part of the New York State Board of Elections.
We’ve all done it. Filled out our voter registration and, you know, made a mistake. Usually we just fix it, before we submit it. It might be a zip code, or we forget to add our apartment number, just small things. We certainly wouldn’t want to register with the wrong party or spell our own name wrong. That would be silly, and super embarrassing if we didn’t catch it. I mean, who forgets how to spell their own name?
But if Jared Kushner is seen as a guy who is not exactly pro wrestler material, nobody has really ever questioned his general manliness. Accepting a role as a top advisor to the President, and being tasked with forging peace in the Mideast don’t really show signs of someone who lacks intestinal fortitude.
Although lately he seems to literally have that Zingbot from Big Brother following him around as he meanders along the corridors of power. But we assure you, we mean no ill will, we are laughing WITH Jared on this one.
So here it is: A Democratic opposition research group has uncovered something about Jared none of us would have ever suspected.
In 2009 when he registered to vote he checked the box for female. Yes, our President’s son in law is a female voter in the great state of New Jersey. But while we might laugh and guffaw at the hilarious error, one easily made, the liberal press have somehow conflated this to mean the President’s point man on peace the in Middle East has somehow disqualified himself.
That’s right, they just assumed that person’s gender!
We really don’t care how Jared identifies himself. We are watching the substance of his advice and influence on actual policy. For instance, the possibility Kushner advised the President to back Luther Strange is somehow as hilarious, if true, as checking the box for female.
Kushner also advised Trump to fire James Comey. He advised the President to hire Anthoni Scaramucci. We are all still laughing about those hilarious blunders. But, hey, if Kushner solves the 2,000 year old riddle of why the Middle East is always in crisis, all is forgiven.
It should be noted, that, according to American Bridge, that Democratic opposition research group, prior to 2009 Jared’s sex was listed as “unknown.” And THAT is even more hilarious.
Does the Arizona Constitution Provide Means for Lawmakers to Crack Down on Big Tech Censorship?
Does the Arizona Constitution provide protections from Big Tech?
The Arizona Constitution provides stronger protections for freedom of speech than the First Amendment does, potentially providing legislative solutions to Big Tech censorship in the state at a moment where political censorship is more pervasive than ever.
Article 2 Section 6, Arizona Constitution states that “Every person may freely speak, write, and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right. “
This differs greatly from the federal constitution in that it doesn’t limit the powers of a legislature to restrict freedom of speech. The US Constitution identifies “Congress” as the body it’s restricting from making a law abridging the freedom of speech.
The speech rights established by the Arizona Constitution are thus expressed positively; recognizing a right belonging to the people, as opposed to negating an infringement of said right.
Quite obviously, the Arizona Constitution was written in an 1910, an era in which the internet would’ve been just as inconceivable as it was in 1789.
In a 2019 Arizona Supreme Court case, the state’s highest court recognized in a 4-3 judgement that the Arizona Constitution provided greater protections than the federal constitution. The case recognized that violations of the First Amendment would represent de facto violations of the
It’s not outside the realm of possibility that the Arizona Attorney General, or state legislature, could hold Big Tech oligarchs to account for violating the Article 2 Section 6 rights of Arizona citizens- especially in a context the major platforms are collectively adjudicated to be acting as a trust in order to suppress competition and silence lawful speech.
Three Arizona legislators called upon Attorney General Mark Brnovich to begin an antitrust investigation into Big Tech oligarchs following the coordinated deplatforming operation against Parler, in which both Amazon and Apple colluded to restrict the free speech platform from the internet.
In an era where the overwhelming majority of free speech is communicated online, the censorious actions of Big Tech very plausibly represent an assault of the right of free expression guaranteed in the Arizona Constitution. Both chambers of Arizona’s legislature remain Republican, even as the state has become purple, and action against Big Tech censorship on the state level could become a real possibility in the coming years.
States2 days ago
Grassroots Leaders Send Final Warning to GOP Establishment: Rejecting Trump Means Death of Republican Party
White House1 day ago
President Trump Contemplates Ditching the GOP, Starting New ‘Patriot Party’ to Put America First
Politics4 days ago
GOP Establishment Threatens President Trump with Impeachment Unless He Denies Election Fraud
Big League National Security4 days ago
DNI Ratcliffe: China Interfered in 2020 Election, CIA Suppressed Info
Tech2 days ago
Free Speech Platform Gab Receives 3 Million New Users in 12 Days
Politics3 days ago
Constituents Already Beginning to Turn on Peter Meijer, Who Admits That Voting to Impeach Trump May Have Ruined His Political Career
Free Speech3 days ago
Tennessee High School Principal Suspended for Speaking Against Big Tech Censorship
Big League National Security4 days ago
Left-Wing Extremist Charged in Alleged Florida Capitol Attack Identified Soros as “Sponsor”