China must prohibit the use of wet food markets throughout its country. It must end their use permanently and effectively, starting now. If it proves unwilling to meaningfully enforce laws against their operation, the United States and its allies throughout the world must be forceful in demanding the nation put an end to these biological threats to mankind, once and for all.
Wet food markets are a form of open-air market- perhaps roughly analogous to American farmer’s markets- where large, diverse collections of exotic animals are kept on queue for slaughter and sale.
Scientists believe that the coronavirus descends from viruses common to bats. The virus was likely to have been passed from a bat to a pangolin, adapting to its new host in a fashion that made it transmissible to humans.
Their connection to the coronavirus isn’t the first incident that’s caused the wet markets to become a target of international criticism. A Chinese wet food market is thought to be the place of origin of the 2003 outbreak of SARS, another novel viral disease. Wet food markets were banned by the Chinese government in light of that epidemic, but they’ve since been allowed to reopen, having a considerable parochial and lobbying interest with the nation’s government.
A video from Vox on the wet food market practice provides insight on the continuing wet food market practice in the country. The liberal media outlet caved to craven political correctness in light of its video’s viral impact, renaming the video from “Why new diseases keep appearing in China” to “How the wildlife trade causes pandemics.”
Experts trace the early cases of the Chinese coronavirus to a wet food market in Wuhan, China. The market was known to contain both bats and pangolins on a menu of animals offered for sale, making it an extremely plausible that the disease adapted to a form transmissible to humans there. It’s a repeat of the 2003 SARS epidemic, although we have every indication to believe the new coronavirus is every bit more lethal.
Some early observers and commentators surmised that the virus may have escaped from a biological laboratory, having originally been developed as a weapon. The likely source for the virus’s origin may be even more alarming. A laboratory is nominally under the control of scientific experts, whereas a wet food market is an open field. Animals with differing genetic structures- ranging from bats to pangolins(which are an endangered species) enter into close contact, passing on diseases that would never encounter diverse, global members of the animal kingdom in the wild.
A biological weapon is ultimately created for human control, but a viral disease that naturally emerges from a conglomeration of diverse animals is far beyond the control of man.
An expert on the Chinese animal trade cited by Vox maintains that the wet food markets are largely opposed by the majority of Chinese people, and one would hope that the people of China would force their government to end the practice once and for all, avoiding a repeat of the comeback of wet markets after the SARS epidemic. But it’s hard to quantify the degree of support that exotic wildlife trade and wet markets have in China, considering they’ve consistently found a way to stay open, despite harming China’s image and veritably being a public health risk to the global public. There are genuine popular movements in the country that oppose animal consumption practices westerners(and people from a diverse range of societies) find repellent, such as the Yulin Dog Market.
But the case of wet markets is far more pressing than slaughtering puppies. These institutions have reliably proven to be a serious danger to mankind. We can’t risk waiting for the next viral epidemic to emerge from a wet food market that creeps back open after public attention to the coronavirus scare fades away years from now, especially considering that it could potentially prove to be even more dangerous.
China has instituted new bans on the consumption and sale of wild animals in response to the coronavirus epidemic. But the tale will tell if the nation’s authoritarian government will effectively prohibit their practice, permanently.
The United States, and concerned nations of the world, can and must use their economic and political leverage to put these wet food markets to a full and permanent end, in the light of the most serious global health epidemic since World War II.
As Trump Leaves Office, Media Cites Ineffectiveness of Lockdowns and Democratic Leaders Display Eagerness to Reopen
Right on cue.
With President Donald Trump’s impending exit from the White House, many are starting to perceive pivots from Democratic leaders and the mainstream media on the ineffectiveness of lockdowns and the reopening of society.
For example, Newsweek ran an article Thursday titled “COVID Lockdowns May Have No Clear Benefit vs Other Voluntary Measures, International Study Shows.” The study, published in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation, found through a mathematical model that there was “no clear, significant beneficial effect of [more restrictive measures] on [COVID-19] case growth in any country.”
This is just one study, of course, so it may not reflect objective reality any more than one study which concludes that lockdowns saved “millions of lives.” But after getting bombarded with messages from the media that lockdowns were necessary—with the opposite message found only on explicitly conservative outlets like Big League Politics—it may seem too coincidental to see such a story while the changing of the presidential guard takes place.
Not only that, it also comes at a time when some Democratic leaders appear to be chomping at the bit to reopen restaurants, bars, and schools—after several months of harsh insistence that they all must stay closed in the name of “safety” and “public health.”
On Monday, for example, Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York called for the reopening of the state’s economy “smartly and safely.”
“We simply cannot stay closed until the vaccine hits critical mass. The cost is too high. We will have nothing left to open. We must reopen the economy, but we must do it smartly and safely,” Cuomo tweeted.
We simply cannot stay closed until the vaccine hits critical mass. The cost is too high. We will have nothing left to open. We must reopen the economy, but we must do it smartly and safely.#SOTS2021
— Andrew Cuomo (@NYGovCuomo) January 11, 2021
Mayor of Chicago Lori Lightfoot put out a similar call on Thursday, saying that bars and restaurants need to reopen “as quickly as possible” because it will help those businesses survive and reduce the number of large private parties and gatherings.
And incoming president Joe Biden recently pitched a $175 billion plan to return children to school, $130 billion of which would be for public elementary, middle, and high schools, the other $35 billion for colleges and universities. Many teachers unions stubbornly refused to return to in-person classes for the longest time, but now that Biden has come out in support of in-person classes, don’t be surprised to see them suddenly change their tune.
The left is so predictable, isn’t it?
Sports4 days ago
National Hockey League Declares War on Trump Supporters? Former Trump Campaign Staffer Reveals Chilling Account of Political Persecution
Violent Left2 days ago
Leftist Thug Targets Roger Stone’s Handicapped Wife for Vicious Attack in Own Neighborhood
Congress4 days ago
Freshman GOP Rep. Nancy Mace Calls for Federal Investigations Against Pro-Trump Lawmakers
Congress3 days ago
Nikki Haley Announces Super PAC to Support Anti-Trump Incumbents with Big Corporate Money
The Swamp4 days ago
Dan Crenshaw White Knights for Liz Cheney After Republicans Blast Her Support for Trump’s Second Impeachment
Around The World2 days ago
Ex-Soviet Leader Gorbachev: US Capitol Riot “Planned in Advance, And It Is Clear by Whom”
Free Speech3 days ago
SILENCING TRUMP: Jared Kushner ‘Intervened’ to Stop the President from Joining Gab, Parler
Tech3 days ago
WEAK EXCUSE: Twitter Oligarch Jack Dorsey Tries to Rationalize Banning Trump, Fails Miserably