Connect with us

Big League Wellness

OPINION: For the Sake of Mankind, End China’s Wet Food Markets. End Them Now.

For the sake of mankind, the practice must end.

Published

on

China must prohibit the use of wet food markets throughout its country. It must end their use permanently and effectively, starting now. If it proves unwilling to meaningfully enforce laws against their operation, the United States and its allies throughout the world must be forceful in demanding the nation put an end to these biological threats to mankind, once and for all.

Wet food markets are a form of open-air market- perhaps roughly analogous to American farmer’s markets- where large, diverse collections of exotic animals are kept on queue for slaughter and sale.

Scientists believe that the coronavirus descends from viruses common to bats. The virus was likely to have been passed from a bat to a pangolin, adapting to its new host in a fashion that made it transmissible to humans.

Trending: Chinese Billionaire Dissident Leaking Hunter Biden Emails Says There Will Be “10,000” More Pictures After Sex Tape

Their connection to the coronavirus isn’t the first incident that’s caused the wet markets to become a target of international criticism. A Chinese wet food market is thought to be the place of origin of the 2003 outbreak of SARS, another novel viral disease. Wet food markets were banned by the Chinese government in light of that epidemic, but they’ve since been allowed to reopen, having a considerable parochial and lobbying interest with the nation’s government.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

A video from Vox on the wet food market practice provides insight on the continuing wet food market practice in the country. The liberal media outlet caved to craven political correctness in light of its video’s viral impact, renaming the video from “Why new diseases keep appearing in China” to “How the wildlife trade causes pandemics.”

Experts trace the early cases of the Chinese coronavirus to a wet food market in Wuhan, China. The market was known to contain both bats and pangolins on a menu of animals offered for sale, making it an extremely plausible that the disease adapted to a form transmissible to humans there. It’s a repeat of the 2003 SARS epidemic, although we have every indication to believe the new coronavirus is every bit more lethal.

Some early observers and commentators surmised that the virus may have escaped from a biological laboratory, having originally been developed as a weapon. The likely source for the virus’s origin may be even more alarming. A laboratory is nominally under the control of scientific experts, whereas a wet food market is an open field. Animals with differing genetic structures- ranging from bats to pangolins(which are an endangered species) enter into close contact, passing on diseases that would never encounter diverse, global members of the animal kingdom in the wild.

A biological weapon is ultimately created for human control, but a viral disease that naturally emerges from a conglomeration of diverse animals is far beyond the control of man.

An expert on the Chinese animal trade cited by Vox maintains that the wet food markets are largely opposed by the majority of Chinese people, and one would hope that the people of China would force their government to end the practice once and for all, avoiding a repeat of the comeback of wet markets after the SARS epidemic. But it’s hard to quantify the degree of support that exotic wildlife trade and wet markets have in China, considering they’ve consistently found a way to stay open, despite harming China’s image and veritably being a public health risk to the global public. There are genuine popular movements in the country that oppose animal consumption practices westerners(and people from a diverse range of societies) find repellent, such as the Yulin Dog Market.

But the case of wet markets is far more pressing than slaughtering puppies. These institutions have reliably proven to be a serious danger to mankind. We can’t risk waiting for the next viral epidemic to emerge from a wet food market that creeps back open after public attention to the coronavirus scare fades away years from now, especially considering that it could potentially prove to be even more dangerous.

China has instituted new bans on the consumption and sale of wild animals in response to the coronavirus epidemic. But the tale will tell if the nation’s authoritarian government will effectively prohibit their practice, permanently.

The United States, and concerned nations of the world, can and must use their economic and political leverage to put these wet food markets to a full and permanent end, in the light of the most serious global health epidemic since World War II.

Big League Wellness

Medical ‘Experts’ Claim COVID-19 Vaccine Tests are Safe Despite First Death in Clinical Trial

This vaccine may be deadly.

Published

on

Big Pharma is doing damage control after a volunteer in a Brazilian COVID-19 vaccine trial died after being stuck with experimental shots.

A Brazilian health authority, Anvisa, has announced that a person had died while participating in AstraZeneca’s coronavirus vaccine study. AstraZeneca’s stock took an immediate downturn as a result of the news. They are trying to downplay the news to protect their immense profits.

A spokesperson from AstraZeneca is claiming that “medical confidentiality and clinical trial regulations” prevents them from commenting on the volunteer’s death in specific terms. They added that ”[a]ll significant medical events are carefully assessed by trial investigators” and ”[t]hese assessments have not led to any concerns about continuation of the ongoing study.”

The academics in the pocket of Big Pharma are rushing to defend the vaccine trials as well. A University of Oxford spokesman claimed “there have been no concerns about safety of the clinical trial” in Brazil, despite the death.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“The independent review in addition to the Brazilian regulator have recommended that the trial should continue,” Oxford spokesperson Alexander Buxton said. So, it seems Big Pharma has investigated Big Pharma’s actions and found that Big Pharma did nothing wrong. What a shocker.

Big League Politics has reported extensively about the dangerousness of the frenzied push to develop a COVID-19 vaccine:

The early trials of the experimental COVID-19 vaccines are showing horrific side effects, including fever, headaches and sustained exhaustion as Big Pharma rushes to get them approved for the masses.

Pharmaceutical giants Moderna and Pfizer are already injecting these dangerous shots into patients, and many of the people involved are reporting terrible side effects. There are currently at least 41 COVID-19 vaccines that are undergoing human trials right now but only Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson are currently in phase three of their trials. Regardless of the potential damage, these powerful corporations intend to have a vaccine approved for the public by the end of the year.

Tens of thousands of individuals are participating in these trials, with some receiving experimental drugs while others receive placebos. The pharmaceutical giants are underplaying the negative side effects in order to protect their cash cow. They stand to make billions, if not trillions, from the vaccines after the media has primed the masses with hysterical and irresponsible propaganda for months.

“No safety signals have been identified in the study,” Pfizer spokesperson Jerica Pitts said in an email. “As discussed earlier, safety and tolerability of our vaccine candidate are continuously monitored by Pfizer qualified personnel and a DMC, an independent external data monitoring committee, which has access to unblinded data.”

Even though they are suffering during the trials, the brainwashed saps who signed up to participate are still happy to be involved. 44-year-old biologist Luke Hutchison is happy to suffer to increase Big Pharma’s profit margins because he worships the golden calf of science and doesn’t care that his RNA will likely be altered permanently during the trials. Anything to help the technocracy take shape is the credo of the soulless globalist.

“I had a high degree of confidence it would work and I wanted to contribute to the solution,” Hutchison said.

Big Pharma and its lackeys has trillions of reasons to obfuscate the truth about the hazards regarding their experimental and unproven COVID-19 vaccines.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending