The coronavirus outbreak is one of the biggest stories in 2020 that could give nationalists across the globe a real-life lesson in the necessity of strong national boundaries.
Originating in the city of Wuhan in China’s Hubei province, CO-VID19 has claimed the lives of over 4,000 people worldwide. The majority of the people impacted by the virus lie in the Hubei province. However, the virus is spreading across the globe thanks to how the inter-connected the world is now.
Populist figures across the world have taken advantage of this crisis to advocate for nationalist policies that focus on strong borders and national sovereignty.
Matteo Salvini, Italy’s former interior minister and leader of the nationalist League party, has been vocal about closing the Italian border in the face of the coronavirus epidemic.
“If [Prime Minister Giuseppe] Conte is not able to defend Italy and Italians, he should step aside,” Salvini said, late in February.
“The infection is spreading. I want to know from the government who has come in and gone out. We have to seal our borders now.”
Italy recently surpassed Iran as the country with the highest number of people dying from CO-VID19 outside of China.
Free movement and open border are some of the European Union’s foundational principles.
In France, the leader of the far-right Rassemblement National (National Rally), Marine Le Pen, took President Emmanuel Macron‘s government to task for allowing Italian football fans to attend a match in Lyon last month, arguing that “a border protects populations, whatever the situation.”
Populist parties in Germany and Spain have demanded that the Shengen agreement, which permits passport-free travel among 26 member states in the European Union, be suspended.
These parties criticized European leaders for putting the “dogma” of open borders on a pedestal, while overlooking their citizens’ health.
In the U.S., the coronavirus is quickly spreading across the country, with certain high-profile events such as the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) having reported cases of attendees contracting the virus.
The U.S. stock market has taken a beating with the Dow Jones dropping by 3,500 points in the week of February 23, 2020.
Apart from the concerns of American economic health, there are more structural matters to reconsider.
The overwhelming majority of pharmaceutical production is located in China, thus leaving the U.S. vulnerable should supply chains be disrupted during “Black Swan” moments like these.
Pat Buchanan described this situation perfectly in a recent article on the coronavirus outbreak:
In recent decades, America’s economic and political elites of both parties surrendered America’s economic independence for globalism, a new interdependence of nations, where we Americans no longer rely on ourselves alone for the vital necessities of our national life.
BLP recently covered the New York Post’s editorial board’s call for bringing back pharmaceutical production to Puerto Rico.
People are starting to slowly wake up to the realities of globalism.
Globalism has been marketed as a solution to solving political problems, but it has created a whole new set of problems such as susceptibility to global pandemics and displacement levels of mass migration. Naturally, these are the consequences of completely integrating economies and migration policies with countries who possess disparate levels of economic development and health infrastructure. Not to mention, cultural differences that may turn migrant waves into destabilizing factors.
This is not a time to talk about GDP or other cliché economic concepts. The current coronavirus crisis deals with more fundamental matters of nationhood—whether or not countries can keep their citizens safe and stay functional in times of crises.
Countries like Israel have already established a 14-day quarantine for all Israelis coming from abroad. Trump must put the American people first by cancelling flights, shutting down vulnerable entry points like the Southern border, and reaffirming the necessity of borders.
Now is the time for action, and Trump must not falter.
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
Greg Abbott Signs Executive Order Keeping Violent Criminals from Going Back on the Streets During the Wuhan Crisis
After the Wuhan Virus was confirmed in several Texas jails in the last week, Texas Governor Greg Abbott issued an executive order on March 29, 2020 that makes it more difficult for several inmates to be let out on “no-cost, personal recognizance bonds.”
Abbott tweeted, “Today I issued an Executive Order preventing [email protected] of dangerous criminals from prisons & jails. We want to prevent the spread of #COVID19 among prison staff & inmates. But, releasing dangerous criminals in the streets is not the solution. #txlege #coronavirus”
Today I issued an Executive Order preventing [email protected] of dangerous criminals from prisons & jails.
— Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) March 30, 2020
Several cases of the Wuhan Virus were discovered in the Dallas County Jail and Harris County Jail last week, two of the state’s largest jails. In addition, a handful of cases were confirmed in state prisons. According to NBC DFW, the virus’ outbreak was “followed by demands to reduce the inmate populations by releasing, immediately and without bond or judicial delay, those held on misdemeanor crimes or awaiting trial on misdemeanor crimes. Some also called for non-violent felons to also be released on no-cost bonds.”
Abbott said Sunday that “releasing dangerous criminals makes the state even less safe” and issued a proclamation to prevent judges, and others, from releasing some inmates without a paid, cash bond.
In his executive order, Abbott declared that a person convicted of a crime that involved or threatened physical violence, or a person arrested for such a crime backed by probable cause, or a person with a criminal history of violent crime, cannot get out of jail on a no-cost personal recognizance bond.
With a PR bond, a defendant is released without having to post any money for his or her bond on the promise they’ll show up to their next court date.
Instead of virtue signaling and buying into the criminal justice reform movement’s desire to foment anarcho-tyranny, Abbott has held his ground by promoting public order.
A crisis like the Wuhan Virus pandemic does not need to be exacerbated by opening up the prison floodgates.
This is one case where American policymakers should use logic not emotion to craft prison policies in times of a pandemic.
Failure to do so will put the U.S. on the road to institutional failure.
Trending on BLP
Big League Wellness3 days ago
VIDEO: Chinese Factory Worker Caught Contaminating Hundreds of Medical Face Masks
Tech4 days ago
National Center For Sexual Exploitation: Snapchat and Teen Vogue are Telling Kids to Make Child Porn!
Politics3 days ago
Hospital Exec Who Called for Trump Supporters with Coronavirus to ‘Give Up Their Ventilators’ and Die is Fired
Big League Wellness2 days ago
Yale Disease Historian: Coronavirus a “Disease of Globalization”
Campaign 20204 days ago
Tucker Carlson Predicts Joe Biden Will Be Replaced By Andrew Cuomo Before Election Day
Big League Wellness3 days ago
Pharma Insider: ‘First Data From Clinical Studies’ Indicates ‘Hydroxychloroquine Kills the Coronavirus’
News3 days ago
Reporter Calls America a S***hole for Leading the World in Wuhan Virus Cases
Big League Guns3 days ago
Trump Designates Gun Retailers and Manufacturers as Essential Businesses