Connect with us

Free Speech

OUTRAGE: Youtube Blocks Trump Rally LiveStreams For Ridiculous Reason

Published

on

Right Side Broadcasting, which live-streams President Donald Trump’s rallies around the country, is experiencing outrageous censorship at the hands of Youtube, which is owned by Google. (READ: FEC Complaint FILED Against Google, Facebook, and Twitter For Election Interference).

Don’t forget the national security and Constitutional implications of censoring the President of the United States’ own rallies. Youtube, it seems, is simply grasping for reasons to deter Right Side Broadcasting (RSB) from their duties out on the campaign trail.

An RSB announcer, speaking as Trump was arriving on Air Force One in Macon, Georgia, revealed to viewers that Youtube de-monetized RSB videos and officially deemed the channel to be not “family friendly.” That’s called Censorship Trolling.

Trending: Google Engineer Admits to Company’s Political Censorship, Election Interference in New Project Veritas Sting #ExposeGoogle

Then a different announcer revealed that Youtube actually physically removed its stream of President Trump’s October 22 rally in Houston with Senator Ted Cruz.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Youtube’s reason, according to RSB: The rally featured an “unknown song by an unknown artist.”

The Silicon Valley tech giant was referring, of course, to the songs that Trump plays before and after his rallies. It’s a repertoire that includes standards like Lee Greenwood’s “God Bless The USA” and some British Invasion classics from the Rolling Stones and others.

Trump’s song selection — supposedly cultivated from his own personal digital library — is a big reason why he got the upper hand on Hillary Clinton, whose rote usage of the saccharine “Fight Song” anthem simply irritated the reporters forced to cover her in 2016.

Right Side Broadcasting recently masked some of the rally audio at a recent Trump appearance, but that detracts from the overall vibe for the channel’s many viewers, and Youtube should probably just stop censoring Trump altogether.

On its channel, Right Side Broadcasting reports that the original version of its October 22 Houston livestream was “blocked by Youtube.”

Right Side Broadcasting notes that the original video for Trump’s October 12 rally in Lebanon, Ohio was also “blocked by Youtube.”

Big League Politics reported:

Americans For Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC) filed a formal FEC complaint Friday against Google, Facebook and Twitter for violation of election law stemming from the tech giants’ widespread censorship and bias against conservative patriotic Americans online.

https://twitter.com/howleyreports/status/1058464287142817793

ALIPAC’s statement reads in part:

“ALIPAC’s new complaint and request for investigations to the FEC sent to Washington, DC via FedEx today can be viewed here–
ALIPAC Complaint to FEC Regarding Silicon Valley Elections Influence
https://www.alipac.us/f8/alipac-complaint-fec-regarding-silicon-valley-elections-influence-365778/

ALIPAC contends that Facebook, Google, and Twitter are violating US elections laws 11 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) sections § 114, § 114.2, and § 114.9, which prohibits corporations and corporation employees from contributing any services or anything of value to elections and campaigns. Silicon Valley companies are contributing to Democrat campaigns by silencing conservative opposition to illegal immigration and groups like ALIPAC that support the conservative anti-Amnesty opponents of left-wing candidates favored by these companies.

§ 114.2(a) states, “National banks and corporations organized by authority of any law of Congress are prohibited from making a contribution, as defined in 11 CFR 114.1(a), in connection with any election to any political office, including local, State and Federal offices, or in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office, including any local, State or Federal office. ”

The ALIPAC FEC complaint alleges that Google, Facebook, and Twitter companies and employees are breaking US laws by using their company technologies, equipment, and employees to contribute to campaigns and influence the outcome of US elections, legislation, and policies in favor of left-wing positions they share with the Democratic Party and Democrat candidates and certain Republicans who also support increases in foreign labor visas and Amnesty legislation backed by these companies.

The leadership of these companies have all publicly stated they support Amnesty legislation for illegal immigrants which ALIPAC opposes, and they have created an umbrella campaign wing through organizations like Facebook’s FWD.us. While their companies seek to support candidates and campaigns that share their views on immigration, they are simultaneously using their company resources to suppress and hinder ALIPAC and many other conservative pundits, bloggers, candidates, and voices.

 

Free Speech

San Francisco Anti-Big Tech Free Speech Rally Attacked by ANTIFA Mob

One man was seriously injured.

Published

on

Left wing thugs viciously beat at least one pro-free speech demonstrator at an impromptu rally in San Francisco’s United Nations plaza.

Conservatives had rallied in defense of free speech against the tyranny of Big Tech platforms that are quartered in the city, most notably Twitter. The demonstration occurred in response to some of the most severe censorship in American history from social media companies in recent days, hiding evidence of corruption and shady foreign business deals on the part of Hunter Biden, Joe Biden’s son.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Philip Anderson, the man who organized the rally, was seriously injured in the assault, which occurred when he crossed a barricade shielding patriotic demonstrators from furious leftists. He lost at least one tooth from a sucker punch.

The screaming leftists who surrounded Anderson chanted racial slurs at the Trump supporter, who is black.

A photographer with the AP described a leftist mob of “hundreds” “attacking” the free speech rally, entirely disrupting the event. Political protests are rare in San Francisco, where Silicon Valley-style neoliberal authoritarians dominate nearly every facet of everyday life.

The left doesn’t want to respect the First Amendment rights of those that oppose it. It’ll settle for nothing less than political domination, and will gladly use violence in pursuit of such ends.

The pro-free speech demonstrators don’t appear to have been deterred, and are said to have been preparing another free speech rally outside the headquarters of Twitter itself.

UPDATE:

Upon seeing Anderson’s injuries, supporters have pitched in more than $6,000 for medical expenses needed from the cheap shot assault. Donate here.

 

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending