Connect with us

Big League National Security

Over 50 Scientists Have Been Fired for Not Disclosing Financial Ties to Foreign Governments, Primarily China

This is a huge problem.

Published

on

Over 50 scientists have already been fired due to a National Institutes of Health (NIH) investigation into why many grantees refused to provide information about their financial ties to foreign governments, and this just may be the tip of the iceberg.

Michael Lauer, NIH’s head of extramural research, made the announcement last week that some 54 scientists had been fired because of their financial ties to foreign governments, mainly China. He issued a presentation with many stunning allegations about the extent of which science has been subverted with foreign dollars.

“It’s not what we had hoped, and it’s not a fun task,” NIH Director Francis Collins said regarding the investigation, which is still ongoing. He said the data is “sobering.”

Trending: As Black Lives Matter Terrorists Burn Down America, Ben Shapiro Endorses Gun Control

82 percent of the individuals under investigation are of Asian descent, which Lauer noted “is not surprising” because “that’s who the Chinese target” in their recruitment for these infiltration programs. This shows yet again that diversity is not a strength when it comes to protecting U.S. national security.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Lauer noted in his presentation that there are 399 scientists who are persons “of possible concern” for the investigation. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has fingered 30 percent of these individuals, with an additional 44 scientists being found by their own institutions to be involved in potential wrong-doing. Of these people in the pool, the investigation has classified 63 percent, or 256 individuals, as “positive,” with evidence indicating these scientists were involved in illicit activities with foreign governments.

This news may be the tip of the iceberg, as certain U.S. public universities desperately try to conceal their deep ties to China:

Currently, university attorneys are under investigation by the U.S. Department of Education and are also preventing Congress from gaining access to records that demonstrate the institutions’ ties to China.

The Education Department’s General Counsel Reed Rubinstein wrote the letter, which told elected officials who requested the documents that the universities’ lawyers “claimed Freedom of Information Act exemptions and legal privileges to block record production to Congress.”

Rubinstein noted that some schools may be too enthusiastic in labeling some documents “confidential” or “privileged.”

However, he pointed out that staff will reach out to each school under investigation and inform them about which records will be handed over to Congress. To block a document being handed over, an objecting school “must provide written specification of the records designated for withholding and specific supporting legal grounds,” the letter stated.

The letter does not explicitly detail which schools pushed the department to keep their records confidential.

Rubinstein’s memo came in response to a May 4 letter from several leading House Republicans requesting that the Education Department hand over documents on all findings or reports outlining gifts from China to U.S. colleges and universities. They alluded to China’s infiltration of the American higher education system and certain misgivings about theft, spying and propaganda.

Ohio Congressman Jim Jordan led the charge by additionally requesting details on all open and closed investigations by the Education Department that dealt with “false or misleading reporting of foreign gifts.”

The red menace has been at work infiltrating while America is sleeping, and this is why institutional rot has taken hold throughout the nation.

Big League National Security

NEW: Joe Biden Bashes Incoming Trump Administration In Leaked 2016 Call to President of Ukraine

Completely inappropriate.

Published

on

Joe Biden speaks in critical and partisan terms of the incoming Trump administration in a new leaked call to the President of Ukraine unveiled Wednesday.

In the call, conducted in November 2016 a week after then-candidate Trump’s election victory, Biden bashes the incoming administration to the foreign leader, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko. Biden assails the Trump transition team as incompetent, turning down the idea of visiting the country before the January transition before Trump is “fully briefed” on matters related to Ukraine.

In a second call, Biden asks for Poroshenko to describe his conversations with incoming President Trump, going to to speak of Trump in more dismissive terms. He describes Trump as a “dog who caught the car, and who doesn’t know what to do.” Not quite a “dog-faced pony soldier,” but definitely not an appropriate way for an outgoing vice president to describe an incoming president to a foreign leader.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

A Ukrainian comedian originally released the calls, suggesting questionable operational security within the conversations of Joe Biden and Poroshenko. Biden has a lengthy history of ethical questions regarding his relationship with Ukraine, including looking the other way as his son Hunter secured an extremely lucrative position at a Ukrainian oil company without any experience whatsoever in the energy industry.

Biden himself would later go on to demand the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating corruption allegations against the younger Biden, a clear conflict of interest Biden merely dismissed when he spoke openly of securing the prosecutor’s firing at a Council on Foreign Relations public event.

This is a totally inappropriate way for a Vice President to speak to a foreign leader, and the public should be concerned about how Biden plans to conduct diplomacy should he be elected President.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending