Connect with us

News

Patrick Howley At Tea Party Summit: They Can’t Call Us Conspiracy Theorists Anymore

Published

on

As the founder and Editor in Chief of Big League Politics, I spoke at the recent Virginia Tea Party Summit, where I explained in detail how I have completely unraveled the media’s 2-D Narrative over the past two years, and how our work in investigative journalism is leading America into a new age of independent thought and populist action.

Since inventing Big League Politics in early 2017, I introduced the world to the facts surrounding the death of Seth Rich, I led the way in exposing the national Antifa cell that tore down the Silent Sam statue on the University of North Carolina campus, I exposed racist Ralph Northam, Justin Fairfax and the Virginia Democrats, I busted the midterm election-stealing effort, I exposed all of the Democrat political links to the NXIVM child trafficking cult in New York, and I completely and utterly defeated Robert Mueller. My years-long plan to expose human trafficking has gone mainstream, with the Jeffrey Epstein case dominating headlines. My work has taken BLP from a startup blog to a world-recognized news organization and favorite of Rush and Tucker — and I now might be the only journalist to ever get the Drudge feature at four different outlets (Breitbart, the Daily Caller, the Free Beacon, and Big League Politics).

Trending: North Carolina Police Officer Viciously Beaten as Onlookers Laugh, Film for 11 Minutes

I have edited all of my favorite writers. Big League Politics’ contributor list reads like a Who’s Who of Amazing Populists, including Cassandra Fairbanks (who caught Seymour Hersh admitting that Brennan and Clapper made Russiagate up), Roger Stone, Neil McCabe, Laura Loomer (who famously confronted Maxine Waters for us at the Capitol), Larry Schweikart, Peter D’Abrosca (who brought down the leaders of the Southern Poverty Law Center), Sidney Powell, Ben Garrison, Kayleigh McEnany, and so many more. Together, we proved that independent media can use market competition to keep the bigger media more honest than they ever intended to be. And I never asked for money from the movement.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

As I said in my speech at the Virginia Tea Party Summit, I have indeed proved my point to America. And I did it every step of the way with pure love and joy. Sleepy Eyes Chuck Todd should take notes!

FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER

LIKE ME ON FACEBOOK

Campaign 2020

Thanks to Spineless, Establishment Republicans, Senate Panel Delays Vote to Subpoena Big Tech CEOs

Republicans Continue to Show Pathetic They are on the Issues that Matter Most

Published

on

America First nationalist’s hopes of having Big Tech CEOs testify before Congress about allegations of censorship directed towards the Right were temporarily dashed on October 19, 2020.

Politico reported that the Senate Judiciary Committee delayed plans to vote on subpoenas to force the CEOs of Twitter and Facebook to go before the Senate and be questioned about their anti-Right wing censorship policies.

Some Republicans ended up having cold feet and decided to postpone the vote much to the disappointment of right wing activists who have complained about Big Tech’s anti-free speech policies.

President Donald Trump and a number of nationalist Republicans have sharply criticized Facebook and Twitter over their censorship of a controversial New York Post report that exposed Hunter Biden, Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden’s son, and his corrupt behavior.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Originally, GOP officials in the Judiciary Committee announced plans to hold a markup on October 20 to determine if they would subpoena Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to get his perspective on allegations concerning his company’s policies that muzzle conservative viewpoints. Twitter denies claims regarding Twitter’s censorship policies.

South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, who is the Chair of the Judiciary Committee, revealed that the planned vote would also call on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to testify.

The panel stated on October 19 that it would determine whether they would issue subpoenas during a executive session on October 22 where it will also allegedly approve Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett. The committee declared in a statement that it will maintain negotiations with the companies “to allow for voluntary testimony” by the CEO. However, if an agreement cannot be reached, the panel will proceed to take a vote on the subpoenas “at a date to be determined.”

The subpoenas would compel the tech big wigs to testify on the reports of “suppression and/or censorship” of New York Post stories and on “any other content moderation policies, practices, or actions that may interfere with or influence elections for federal office,” according to a committee document released on October 19.

Texas Senator Ted Cruz, who is the chair of the Judiciary’s Subcommittee on the Constitution said to reporters that he’s expecting the committee to preside over testimonies from the Twitter and Facebook chiefs “shortly” regardless of whether they come to the decision on their own volition.

“One way or another, either voluntarily or pursuant to subpoena, they will testify and they will testify before the election,” Cruz stated.

In a separate hearing for the Senate Commerce Committee, Zuckerberg and Dorsey will join Google CEO Sundar Pichai on October 28 for a hearing on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which generally shields Big Tech companies from a liability.

Cruz, who is a member of both Judiciary and Commerce committees, wants each panel to carry out their own hearings with the tech chiefs before election day. “I believe we need a separate hearing in Judiciary because the issues being discussed in the two committees are different,” Cruz remarked.

Big Tech has become too powerful, especially during a time when social media has become the de facto public square. Republicans will need to get serious about making online speech receive the same treatment as general political speech.

 

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending