Connect with us

Campaign 2020

Peter Navarro Releases Comprehensive Report on 2020 Election, Concludes That Significant Irregularities Occurred and May Have Altered Outcome

How can our leaders in good conscience rubber stamp this election for Biden?

Published

on

Peter Navarro, an economist and White House trade adviser, released a 35-page report Thursday on the integrity—or lack thereof—of the 2020 election. It is titled “The Immaculate Deception: Six Key Dimensions of Election Irregularities.”

The report, according to a press release, “provides a comprehensive, objective assessment of the fairness and integrity of the 2020 election, obtained through evidence including more than 50 lawsuits around the nation, thousands of affidavits and testimonies, published analyses, media reports and more.”

Read the entire report here.

After compiling all this information, Navarro was able to conclude that “significant irregularities occurred across all six battleground states and across all six dimensions of election irregularities.”

Trending: GOP Establishment Threatens President Trump with Impeachment Unless He Denies Election Fraud

“This finding lends credence to the claim that the election may well have been stolen from President Donald J. Trump,” the report reads.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The six dimensions of election irregularities that Navarro assesses in each swing state include outright voter fraud, ballot mishandling, contestable process fouls, Equal Protection Clause violations, voting machine irregularities, and significant statistical anomalies. The assessed swing states include Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

In his report Navarro distinguishes between “widespread evidence” and “some evidence” of the various election irregularities. From the data he concluded the following:

  • There is widespread evidence of outright voter fraud in Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, and Wisconsin. There is only some evidence of outright fraud in Michigan and Pennsylvania.
  • Widespread ballot mishandling occurred in five of the six swing states. Navarro did not find evidence of it in Arizona.
  • Widespread contestable process fouls and violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment occurred in all six states.
  • There is only some evidence of voting machine irregularities in Wisconsin, widespread evidence in every other swing state.
  • Significant statistical anomalies were found in five of six states. Navarro did not find evidence of them in Pennsylvania.

Based on this, Navarro writes that “it is irresponsible for anyone—especially the mainstream media—to claim there is ‘no evidence’ of fraud and irregularities.”

“It is possible to infer what may well have been a coordinated strategy to effectively stack the election deck against the Trump-Pence ticket,” the report reads.

Navarro also touches on the possibility of 1.5 million illegal ballots being cast in the six swing states combined. He believes there may have been at least 100,000 potentially illegal ballots cast in Nevada and Arizona, 200,000 in Wisconsin, 400,000 in Georgia, and a whopping 600,000 in Pennsylvania. There is no estimate for Michigan.

The most consistent election irregularities that occurred across all six states relate to contestable process fouls and violations of the Equal Protection Clause. These include abuses and partisan treatment of poll watchers and observers, ballots illegally cured by poll workers, and violations of mail-in and absentee ballot rules.

Navarro’s last sentence reads as follows: “If these election irregularities are not fully investigated prior to Inauguration Day and thereby effectively allowed to stand, this nation runs the very real risk of never being able to have a fair presidential election again—with the down-ballot Senate races scheduled for January 5 in Georgia an initial test case of this looming risk.”

Click here to read the entire report.

Campaign 2020

“Moderate” Democrat Senator Joe Manchin Wants Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz Removed From the Senate

So much for moderation and unity…

Published

on

Conventional wisdom can often be misleading and at times dangerous if we believe in it too strongly.

Take for example West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin. He is constantly marketed as the Democrats’ most moderate Senator. There is a grain of truth to this. Manchin has publicly stated that he opposes ending the filibuster and has also poured cold water on $2,000 stimulus checks. But that’s where the moderation ends.

Manchin is now saying that the Senate should entertain the idea of expelling Senators Josh Hawley (R-MO) and Ted Cruz (R-TX) by using the 14th Amendment over their recent decision to challenge the Electoral College results.

On PBS’s Firing Line, Manchin said the Senate should look into the option after right-wing activists stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Manchin is of the opinion that President Donald Trump and Senators like Hawley and Cruz “incited” these demonstrators.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“That should be a consideration,” Manchin stated. “He understands that. Ted’s a very bright individual, and I get along fine with Ted, but what he did was totally outside of the realm of our responsibilities or our privileges.”

According to the 14th Amendment, no elected official “shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”

Hyped up leftist pundits believe that the 14th amendment is applicable to Cruz and Hawley due to how they allegedly “incited” the riot by talking about electoral fraud and pointing out electoral irregularities.

“I’m totally convinced it was done because of political reasons. This was all politically motivated. This was calculated,” declared Manchin. “I believe that all my colleagues truly made a decision that was politically best for them and expedient for them. It was not what they believed to be true or false.”

Unquestionably, Manchin is an establishment hack through and through. He may have reasonable views on gun policy, in part due to West Virginia’s strong gun culture, but Manchin is still a member of the D.C. swamp. His recent statements demonstrate this. Republican nationalists should relieve him of the burden of holding public office in 2024.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending