Connect with us

News

Pocahontas Off the Reservation: Elizabeth Warren Declares Climate Change a National Emergency

Published

on

Presidential hopeful Elizabeth Warren is echoing her Democratic colleagues push for unconstitutional national emergencies.

Ever since President Trump declared a state of emergency at the southern border, Democrats have gone unhinged.

Starting with Nancy Pelosi, Democrats have shifted the national emergency conversation to their own pet projects such as climate change and gun violence.

Trending: President Donald Trump to Hold “Tremendous” MAGA Rally in Georgia for GOP Senators

The Massachusetts Senator and presidential hopeful Elizabeth Warren took advantage of her appearance on CBS’s “The Late Late Show” to promote her leftist views.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The Late Late Show host James Corden asked for Warren’s take on the president’s national emergency declaration and what would be considered a national emergency under a Warren presidency.

Warren laid out a list of emergency items:

“Climate change, gun violence, student loan debt, right off the top. That’s what we ought to be working on. And we ought to be working on it together. Congress, the President, as a country, those are things we should be working on.”

Warren’s statements just show how out of touch Democrats are with their policy propositions. Trump’s national emergency has a constitutional basis and is a sound policy for a nation that wants to remain culturally and politically stable.

On the other hand, what Warren is calling for is as unconstitutional and despotic as it gets. Trampling on the God-given right to self-defense and private property rights is standard fare for the present-day Democratic party. Globalism is their religion, which requires many constitutional sacrifices. Economic and institutional damage be damned.

From her support of the Green New Deal to wealth taxation, Elizabeth Warren is the embodiment of modern-day progressivism.

Warren’s use of her fake Native American ancestry to advance through Harvard Law School and on her application for the State Bar of Texas just shows how ingrained her identity politics is.

All these factors considered, she’s a perfect fit for the Democratic Party.

The only national emergency here is how people like Warren get elected in the first place.

 

Culture

Starbucks Barista FIRED After Refusing to Wear “Pride” T-Shirt for Religious Reasons, According to Lawsuit

She is a Christian and was apparently told by her manager that she didn’t have to wear it.

Published

on

A former Starbucks barista is filing an unlawful discrimination lawsuit against the coffee giant, claiming they fired her for refusing to wear a “Pride” t-shirt that violated her Christian religious convictions.

Betsy Fresse started working as a barista in December 2015. After transferring to a Glen Ridge, New Jersey, store in early 2019, managers apparently “assured” her that her Christian faith wouldn’t be an issue.

Then in June 2019, she noticed a box of Pride shirts on a desk and asked if they’d make her wear one. Her store manager said she wouldn’t have to, but two months later she found herself out of a job after being terminated by a district manager.

A notice of separation claims that Fresse was fired for violating Starbucks’ “core values.” It specifically mentions an incident where she said her colleagues “need Jesus” when given the “Pride” shirt.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Starbucks maintains that “no part of our dress code requires partners to wear any approved items that they have not personally selected” and that Fresse’s claims are “without merit,” in a comment to the New York Post.

So Starbucks denies that she was fired for not wearing the shirt, yet their notice of separation appears to claim that they fired her for something she said about Jesus. Not a good look either way.

Fresse is seeking backpay, punitive damages, money to cover the cost of an attorney, and a permanent injunction that prevents Starbucks from “failing to accommodate […] sincerely held religious beliefs.”

Starbucks has long been a major player in the world of Woke Capital. Back in February Big League Politics reported on how the British branch of Starbucks was raising money for a pro-transgender lobbying group:

The U.K. branch of Starbucks is raising money to push for the chemical castration and surgical mutilation of children.

Nathanael Blake at The Federalist reported that the multinational titan is selling special mermaid-shaped cookies to help the pro-transgender lobbying group Mermaids. Curiously, the group’s founder took her underage son to Thailand to undergo a castration procedure.

Blake correctly observed “That Starbucks is supporting this group illustrates how thoroughly radicals have conquered both the LGBT movement and corporate culture.”

He also called attention to how “In a few years the fight has shifted from government recognition of same-sex relationships as legal marriages to mastectomies, sterilization, and castration for children.”

Here’s hoping that Betsy Fresse is successful in her lawsuit.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending