Connect with us

White House

Pocahontas Threatens Anti-Constitutional Crusade Against ‘White Nationalists’

Her vague threat issued on social media could mean that Pocahontas wants to target her political enemies if she wins the presidency

Published

on

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has wasted no time exploiting the spree killings in New Zealand for her own socialist, anti-white political agenda. Pocahontas now claims she will “go after white nationalists with full prosecution.”

Trending: Trucking Industry Leaders Expect Biden’s Policies to Crush Small Trucking Companies

While white nationalists may pose a threat to society, there is nothing illegal in the United States about expressing those beliefs or any political ideology for that matter. According to their collected writings, the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution with the consideration in mind to protect political speech even if it may be incendiary or offensive.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024?

  • POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Our First Amendment freedoms give us the right to think what we like and say what we please,” wrote James Madison, who is popularly known as the Father of the Constitution. “And if we the people are to govern ourselves, we must have these rights, even if they are misused by a minority.”

“Freedom of speech is a principal pillar of a free government; when this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved, and tyranny is erected on its ruins. Republics and limited monarchies derive their strength and vigor from a popular examination into the action of the magistrates,” Benjamin Franklin wrote in an op/ed for the Pennsylvania Gazette in 1737.

“I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty, than those attending too small a degree of it,” Thomas Jefferson wrote to Archibald Stuart in 1791.

The Founding Fathers would have strongly disagreed with Pocahontas’ policy proposal, perhaps believing her to be a tyrant for her assault on their basic rights.

Warren’s proposed power grab may be more than a virtue-signalling platitude. With the ongoing leftist character assassination of any Trump supporter as a “white nationalist,” Warren could be granting herself an open-ended mandate to point her federal tomahawks square in the faces of those she believes have wronged her noble people.

Trump supporters associated with the Proud Boys, a pro-Western fraternal organization that unabashedly supports the President, have been targeted by leftists in recent years. Some members have lost jobs and been cut off from their personal bank accounts for being falsely profiled as white nationalists.

A situation occurred late last year in New York City where violent ANTIFA terrorists attacked the Metropolitan Republican Club hoping to stop Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes from addressing the attendees the following night. Proud Boys were heroically forced to confront these ANTIFA terrorists on the streets in order for the event to take place.

After the fact, the media worked in concert with leftist government officials to completely distort and misrepresent the facts of the incident. The Trump supporters who stood up for their rights received the charges while the left-wing domestic terrorists were painted as the heroes. This is the type of justice that Warren will likely expand if she wins the presidency, with “white nationalist” being defined as any individual more right-leaning than low energy Jeb Bush.

New Zealand mosque murderer Brenton Tarrant claimed in his deranged manifesto that he wished “to agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to over extend their own hand and experience the eventual backlash” with his acts of terrorist violence.

By being such a deceptive shameless demagogue, Pocahontas is fulfilling the wishes of the murderer. More individuals would be radicalized if her anti-American policies to crush free speech ever came to fruition.

White House

Biden White House Makes YouTube Upload of Inaugural Speech ‘Unlisted’ After Being Flooded With Dislikes

The Inaugural Address wasn’t well received.

Published

on

Joe Biden’s White House staff privatized an upload of his inaugural address from the White House YouTube page, after the video was rationed with a wave of dislikes.

As of late Wednesday night, Biden’s Inaugural Address has more than 17,000 dislikes, and less than 4,000 likes. Sensing that the public wasn’t responding positively, the Biden administration made the video “unlisted” some time after its initial streaming.

In a legally questionable development, the Biden White House staff have also disabled comments on the Inaugural Address. Court rulings previously forced the Trump administration to unblock fanatic liberal reply guys on Twitter, with judges ruling that they had the right to engage with the President on the platform.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024?

  • POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The inaugural address is accessible here.

The poor reaction may have come in part from the existing YouTube subscriber demographic of the White House channel, which was primarily composed of Trump supporters. Other uploads of Biden’s Inaugural Address on the YouTube channels of mainstream media networks have a more favorable like-to-dislike ratio.

The takedown of the video could ultimately be challenged under a 2018 court ruling establishing presidential social media accounts as public forums, with comments enabled. Biden will have to face criticism- even on his official internet presence- as President.


Follow me on Gab @WildmanAZ, Twitter @Wildman_AZ, and on Parler @Moorhead.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending