President Donald Trump leads 2020 Democratic presidential aspirant Beto O’Rourke 52-39 in the state of Texas, according to a poll commissioned by Courageous Conservatives PAC prior to President Trump’s Monday night rally in El Paso.
According to Courageous Conservatives: “O’Rourke’s problems stem from his poor favorable/unfavorable numbers. Just 28 percent of Texas voters view O’Rourke favorably while 44 percent have an unfavorable view.”
O’Rourke recently bungled his presidential flirtation with a bizarre video in which he went to the dentist.
President Trump is already a runaway freight train politically in the 2020 election.
BLP reported: President Donald Trump has won the undivided support of the Republican National Committee ahead of the 2020 presidential election.
The RNC voted unanimously at its official meeting in New Mexico to award Trump the party’s support.
President Trump’s consolidation of political power in the aftermath of his record-setting government shutdown continues, and Trump holds all the cards due to the national emergency option.
President Trump’s signing of Executive order 13767 for the Border Wall gives him perfect legal justification to build the border Wall.
By law, the border wall must be funded.
Here’s some relevant data about the Beto poll: “Atlantic Media & Research of Nags Head, North Carolina surveyed 504 registered voters with live operators for Courageous Conservatives PAC. Respondents either voted in the 2016 general election or registered since that time and said their chances of voting in the 2020 presidential election were “definite” or “very likely.” 49 percent of respondents were reached on cellphones and 7 percent of surveys were completed in Spanish. The theoretical margin of error is +/- 4.4 percent in 95 percent of cases. Calls were completed between January 5-11, 2019.”
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
Did Bernie Sanders Just Endorse a Neocon Regime Change Foreign Policy?
Is Bernie Sanders the anti-war candidate that many non-interventionists are making him out to be?
Journalists Jacob Crosse and Barry Grey presented some interesting observations about Sanders’ foreign policy views.
Sanders criticized the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Suleimani in January and also stressed his opposition to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
During the Iowa presidential debate, Sanders loudly boasted, “I not only voted against that war, I helped lead the effort against that war.”
However, Sanders changed his tune when chatting with the New York Times.
The answers the Sanders campaign gave the Times showed its flexibility when it comes to foreign policy.
In other words, the Sanders campaign signaled to the military and intelligence apparatus that Sanders won’t present a threat to their interests and may actually carry out their interventionist agenda.
One question in the survey that the Times sent the Sanders campaign stuck out above the rest.
The third survey question asked, “Would you consider military force to pre-empt an Iranian or North Korean nuclear or missile test?”
The Sanders campaign responded, “Yes.”
Based on this response, Sanders’ is signaling that he’s willing to continue Bush-era policies of “preemptive war.”
Like Obama, Sanders’ opposition to the Iraq War was a matter of politics rather than a principled opposition to regime change wars.
His campaign was also asked, “Would you consider military force for a humanitarian intervention?”
Sanders responded, “Yes.”
Some of the wars that the U.S. carried out in the name of “human rights” have been the Bosnian war and the bombing of Serbia in the 1990s along with the aerial campaign against Libya in 2011 and the Civil War launched in Syria.
All in all, Sanders’ pro-peace/non-interventionist image is at best window dressing.
Under a Sanders presidency, the interventionist status quo will likely stay in place.
News4 days ago
Bernie Sanders 2020 ‘Win’ in NH Netted a LOSS OF 80,000 VOTES from 2016
News4 days ago
Virginia State Police are Silent About Door-to-Door Enforcement of Suppressor Ban
Violent Left3 days ago
New Mexico Bureaucrat Arrested for Vandalizing State GOP Headquarters
Violent Left4 days ago
New Hampshire Thug Arrested After Assaulting ‘MAGA’ Hat-Wearing 15-Year Old at Polling Site
News3 days ago
MS-13 Thug Gets Life Sentence in Virginia for Rape and Abduction
Tech3 days ago
More Censorship: Controversial Right-Wing YouTuber Nick Fuentes is Booted From Platform, Even Ben Shapiro Says It’s Too Far
Deep State3 days ago
Bill Barr Pushes Back Against Trump, Criticizes President’s Comments on Stone, Drops Case Against McCabe
Culture3 days ago
How Vulture Capitalists Use Their Ill-Gotten Gains to Push Transgenderism Onto Children
Violent Left4 days ago
Wife of ‘Proud Boys’ Member Imprisoned for Self-Defense Pleads for Help for Their Three Children
The Swamp2 days ago
SWAMP: FBI Press Officer Accepted Baseball Tickets From CNN Reporter
News4 days ago
GUILTY: Creepy Porn Lawyer Michael Avenatti Convicted in Extortion Trial
Politics4 days ago
MIT Warns That Voting App Used in Several States is Vulnerable for Hackers to ‘Alter, Stop or Expose’ Votes