Connect with us

Black Lives Matter

POLL: Support for Black Lives Matter Protests Has PLUMMETED After Summer of Riots, Crime

Americans are turning on the riot movement.

Published

on

New polling from AP and the University of Chicago indicates that support has sharply declined for the Black Lives Matter protest movement, with 15% less Americans supporting the movement now than they did in June 2020.

At the time, a majority (54%) of Americans overall supported the movement. Now, it is decisively unpopular; only 39% of Americans support the Black Lives Matter protest movement. 44% express their specific disapproval, a figure that is also presumably growing.

Trending: Ex-Soviet Leader Gorbachev: US Capitol Riot “Planned in Advance, And It Is Clear by Whom”

Curiously, even less Latinos support the riot movement than White Americans; with 31% of the former demographic expressing support for it, whereas 35% of whites do. Democrats have increasingly ignored the concerns of Hispanic Americans- many of whom live in crucial swing states such as Florida, Nevada and Arizona, instead placing emphasis on a demographic that already votes for the party in an almost universal fashion.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Support for other longstanding claims of BLM’s adherents has also tanked. The poll indicates that Americans are growing cold towards the claims of police oppression and a fundamentally racist justice system.

Overall, Americans are less likely than they were in June to say deadly force is more commonly used against a Black person than a white person, 50% vs. 61%. And fewer now say that officers who cause injury or death on the job are treated too leniently by the justice system, 52% vs. 65%.

Many Americans had been inclined to support the grievance movement following the death of home invasion convict George Floyd. But the consistent pattern of criminality and violence from its most staunch supporters appears to have worn out BLM’s welcome, and its enablers may soon pay the political price.

Liberals and progressives may have counted their chickens before they hatched. Many assumed the movement’s popularity would endure to the November election, but it now appears to have become an electoral liability at the worst possible time for the Democratic Party. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have increasingly sought to distance themselves from BLM, urging rioters to act peacefully, but the writing on the wall is clear.

Black Lives Matter

Left-Wing Grifter Found Inside the U.S. Capitol is Hated by Black Lives Matter Activists

Conservatives are reporting fake news.

Published

on

Many conservative outlets are running with the news that one left-wing activist made his way into the U.S. Capitol during last week’s siege and spinning a conspiracy that ANTIFA was behind the entire operation.

This is fake news that can be dispelled with basic research into John Sullivan, the provocateur who entered the U.S. Capitol with an accomplice to foment and document the chaos. 

Independent news outlet The Grayzone reported about Sullivan’s reputation in Utah among Black Lives Matter activists. He is not a leader of the BLM movement, but rather a pariah, because he has fanned the flames at every turn for his own self-serving purposes.

According to self-described BLM and anti-fascist activists familiar with the 26-year-old Sullivan, he is best known for his propensity for inspiring chaos, engaging in counterproductive tactics that often trigger arrests, and consistently undermining BLM objectives. From Salt Lake City to Portland to Washington, DC, left-wing activists consider him persona non grata,” journalist Max Blumenthal wrote.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Blumenthal interviewed activists to fully understand why Sullivan is despised in the Black Lives Matter community.

If there’s violence to instigate, he will raise it to another level. But he’s not the one that does it,” Sean Michael Love, a DC-based BLM activist who publishes Blackhouse News, said about Sullivan. “And that’s a dangerous type of person. That’s one of the most dangerous types of people to me.”

Sullivan is facing charges of criminal mischief and inciting a riot in Provo, Utah. He has received additional charges for entering into the U.S. Capitol and fanning the flames amidst a surreal scene.

His own brother, James, explains that this left-wing agitator is mentally ill and addicted to chasing media celebrity. 

What he does is he creates hysteria, and he takes these phony videotapes of it, so that’s why he got kicked out of the movement [in Utah],” James Sullivan said. “They kicked him out because he would he would instigate violence to the point that people would get would get arrested. And then he would get views on Facebook or YouTube… He’s doing it for attention.”

There is additional fake news that is circulating among conservatives that Sullivan’s associate or accomplice, filmmaker Jane Sacker, is an employee of CNN. However, there is no record of Sacker being anything other than a guest on a CNN show. This fake news is being used to falsify the record and obfuscate the truth about what happened at last week’s Capitol siege.

Big League Politics has debunked conservative fake news and conspiracy theories that ANTIFA leftists were behind last week’s events:

Less than a week after the infamous U.S. Capitol siege took place, many conservative talking heads – perhaps in an attempt to protect President Donald Trump from the nuclear fall-out – are claiming that ANTIFA terrorists were responsible for the mayhem that ultimately resulted in five people dead…

However, investigative work by Big League Politics shows that there is no real evidence showing that this event was promulgated or set up by ANTIFA and the political establishment.

In fact, there is more evidence showing that this was a spontaneous uprising of angry patriots who have been pushed past the breaking point.

As a reporter who was embedded in the thick of the chaotic scene, I personally witnessed protesters singing “God Bless America” and “I’m Proud to be an American” while they were being tear gassed and flash banged by authorities.

Protesters were risking life and limb to climb up scaffolding to wave the American flag and boldly display their patriotism. Chants included “USA! USA!” and “We the People,” with constitutional iconography being found everywhere…

Conservatives claiming that the demonstrators dressed in black was proof that they were ANTIFA. However, Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio noted that members of his group were going dark for the rally to make it more difficult to be targeted with the additional heat on the organization.

“We will not be wearing our traditional Black and Yellow,” said Tarrio, who was banned from Washington D.C. during the rally.

“We might dress in all BLACK for the occasion,” he added.

If John Sullivan and his associate were not present at the Capitol siege, the entire situation would have proceeded in the exact same manner. Conservative personalities are throwing pro-Trump demonstrators to the wolves in a pathetic and anti-patriotic attempt to protect their grift.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending