Connect with us

News

Popular Spanish Nationalist Calls for More Gun Rights in Spain

Published

on

The Leader of Spain’s right-wing populist party Vox is calling for looser gun laws.

Santiago Abascal, the head of Vox, said that law-abiding Spaniards should have easier access to firearms for self-defense. In an interview, Abascal stated that “”the concept of legitimate defense needs to be widened” in Spain.

Abascal’s party is projected to have a big showing in the local, regional, and European elections on May 26, 2019. With a potential increase in seats in the Spanish Parliament, gun rights are positioned to become a normal part of political discussions in Spain.

Trending: More Americans Now Identify as Republicans Than They Do As Democrats

In the past, Abascal has boasted about carrying a handgun because his family was targeted by the Basque terrorist group ETA. Such a threat allowed Abascal to obtain a gun license, which is generally off limits to most of the nation’s populace

take our poll - story continues below

Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Spanish gun control is draconian. Information from the  U.S. Library of Congress reveals that firearms licenses for personal defense are only granted to individuals “who can prove that a real danger to their security exists.”

The populist leader believes that Spain’s current gun control laws should be relaxed. Abascal expanded on the need for more gun rights in Spain:

We need an urgent radical change in the law, not only so that the Spaniards without criminal records and in full use of their mental faculties can keep a weapon in their house… But so that they can use it in real life-threatening situations without fear of facing a judicial nightmare, prison sentences or even the prospect of having to pay compensation to the relatives of criminals who assaulted them.

Vox’s embrace of expanded gun rights is part of a new trend in European politics that started with the Czech Republic’s decision in 2017 to liberalize gun ownership as a means of bolstering national security in the country.

Now countries like Italy are following in the Czech Republic’s footsteps in bringing forward their own versions of gun liberalization. Once Matteo Salvini became Minister of the Interior Italy in 2018, Italy began easing restrictions on how many firearms Italians can own and the size of magazines they can use.  Now, Salvini and his coalition are considering a “legitimate defense” bill, that would allow Italians to use lethal force when confronting imminent threats in their own homes.

With increased refugee migration to Spain over the past two years, the Spanish population has become leery. As a result, Vox’s populist message has grown in popularity. Should migration continue,  Spain could experience the rise of immigrant crime zones and other unwanted side effects of open borders like migrant welfare dependency.

Although it won’t solve all of Spain’s problems, having the right to self-defense will help Spaniards protect themselves from the troubling trends of mass migration.

Vox’s tremendous showing during the May elections may bode well for expanded gun rights in the Iberian Peninsula.

 

 

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Have a hot tip for Big League Politics?

Got a hot news tip for us? Photos or video of a breaking story? Send your tips, photos and videos to tips@bigleaguepolitics.com. All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff.

Have something to say? Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions@bigleaguepolitics.com.

You Might Like

News

Did Bernie Sanders Just Endorse a Neocon Regime Change Foreign Policy?

Published

on

Is Bernie Sanders the anti-war candidate that many non-interventionists are making him out to be?

Journalists Jacob Crosse and Barry Grey presented some interesting observations about Sanders’ foreign policy views.

Sanders criticized the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Suleimani in January and also stressed his opposition to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

During the Iowa presidential debate, Sanders loudly boasted, “I not only voted against that war, I helped lead the effort against that war.”

take our poll - story continues below

Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

However, Sanders changed his tune when chatting with the New York Times.

The answers the Sanders campaign gave the Times showed its flexibility when it comes to foreign policy.

In other words, the Sanders campaign signaled to the military and intelligence apparatus that Sanders won’t present a threat to their interests and may actually carry out their interventionist agenda.

One question in the survey that the Times sent the Sanders campaign stuck out above the rest.

The third survey question asked, “Would you consider military force to pre-empt an Iranian or North Korean nuclear or missile test?”

The Sanders campaign responded, “Yes.”

Based on this response, Sanders’ is signaling that he’s willing to continue Bush-era policies of “preemptive war.”

Like Obama, Sanders’ opposition to the Iraq War was a matter of politics rather than a principled opposition to regime change wars.

His campaign was also asked, “Would you consider military force for a humanitarian intervention?”

Sanders responded, “Yes.”

Some of the wars that the U.S. carried out in the name of “human rights” have been the Bosnian war and the bombing of Serbia in the 1990s along with the aerial campaign against Libya in 2011 and the Civil War launched in Syria.

All in all, Sanders’ pro-peace/non-interventionist image is at best window dressing.

Under a Sanders presidency, the interventionist status quo will likely stay in place.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


You Might Like

Trending