The courageous whistle-blower who leaked out information to Project Veritas in June showing how Google was manipulating its algorithms for the purposes of extreme Draconian censorship against conservatives has revealed himself as Zachary Vorheis.

BREAKING @Project_Veritas: Google “Machine Learning Fairness” Whistleblower Goes Public, says: “burden lifted off of my soul,” Leaks Hundreds of Internal Documents – See all: https://t.co/0LZRyrWNqV pic.twitter.com/Y8WknYzG7o

— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) August 14, 2019

A treasure trove of leaked Google internal documents are now available to view on the Project Veritas website with tabs on censorship, politics, fake news, hiring practices, leadership training, machine learning fairness, partisanship, psychological research, misc and video, and everything.zip.

Trending: BOMBSHELL: Whistleblowers Present Hundreds of Pages of Evidence Alleging Illicit Behavior of Clinton Foundation

Some of the leaked documents indicate that Google acts as a partisan publisher rather than a neutral platform, which may nullify their protections under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996.

Who asked “platforms” like Google to to rank news sites like @WSJ, @CNN, @MSNBC? Why would they make apparent news decisions? How do they determine which is more credible than the next, and who is making these decisions? Leaked Google doc: pic.twitter.com/9Q8IR8yGED

take our poll - story continues below

Should Adam Schiff be tried for treason for fabricating statements attributed to President Trump?

• Should Adam Schiff be charged with treason for fabricating statements attributed to President Trump?

• Should Adam Schiff be charged with treason for fabricating statements attributed to President Trump?*
  • Yes, he should face consequences.
  • No, it's ok that Adam Schiff made up statements.
• Email*
• Phone
  This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) August 14, 2019

Google appears to employ “human raters” to evaluate fake news. Doesn’t that sound a bit like a newspaper editor . . . ? ????

I thought Google didn’t have an editorial agenda . . . #GoogleExposed #ProjectVeritas pic.twitter.com/bFAQazAm7G

— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) August 14, 2019

Also leaked by Google was talk by YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki explaining what appear to be news and editorial decisions about “authoritative” and “fake” news. pic.twitter.com/l8nO8DuoO7

— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) August 14, 2019

Another leaked document shows how Google has prepared their Big Brother censorship policies and defended them with politically correct neologisms.

This document appears to highlight Algorithmic Discrimination and ways Google could use control methods to solve for fairness. pic.twitter.com/9OYiIeBKOe

— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) August 14, 2019

“RESTRICT” what others can learn about them . . . #GoogleExposed pic.twitter.com/qOxADjJHbD

— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) August 14, 2019

pic.twitter.com/T3JT4BeuOL

— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) August 14, 2019

Each of the six control methods can be employed to minimize the results of Algorithmic Discrimination . . . pic.twitter.com/6HDL6kM8nL

— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) August 14, 2019

Some “opportunities” for increasing “control.” #GoogleExposed pic.twitter.com/RwP0bVNkNO

— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) August 14, 2019

Google has also been exposed for their manipulation efforts during the 2016 presidential election, attempting in futility to make sure Hillary Clinton would beat Donald Trump.

GOOGLE EXPOSED:

Leaked documents show employees discussing Hillary Clinton’s loss in the 2016 presidential election.

“We worked very hard. Many people did. We pushed to get out the Latino vote with our features, our partners, and our voices.” @Project_Veritas @JamesOKeefeIII pic.twitter.com/FERNyPuh4M

— PragerU (@prageru) August 14, 2019

Another document shows a massive list of websites that are blacklisted by Google, most of which are conservative-leaning in their focus:

According to leaked docs obtained by @JamesOKeefeIII of @Project_Veritas, we are being actively excluded from @Google search results. Anyone surprised? pic.twitter.com/JPqiwBjH7A

— Steven Crowder (@scrowder) August 14, 2019

Google has also been exposed for using a bizarre analogy regarding “coffee beans” to describe their diversity policies in hiring, a fact that they wanted to keep hidden from the public.

.@Google on Diversity hiring, “Imagine a world where there are two kinds of coffee beans that grow naturally. They are the orange beans and the teal beans . . .”

Googler warns: better off not sharing it externally due to legal questions.

Coffee Beans: https://t.co/5z0WkNbUIp pic.twitter.com/RmxWELn7Hp

— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) August 14, 2019

Vorheis is already under attack by the liberal media, desperate to defame the whistle-blower in the hopes that it will take the public’s eyes off the leaked documents showing Google’s deceptive and unethical practices.

James O’Keefe’s new tech whistleblower is an anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist who believes in QAnon, hates vaccines, and thinks Jews committed the 9/11 attacks. https://t.co/wUMhcmlGT3

— Will Sommer (@willsommer) August 14, 2019

Project Veritas promoted claims of Google censorship today from a person that @willsommer reports posted conspiracy theories and language popular with white supremacists.

It’s the latest self-own for Project Veritas, in a long series of self-owns.https://t.co/cFEplhBJTA

— Jared Holt (@jaredlholt) August 14, 2019

Veritas founder James O’Keefe took the fake news hacks to task in a tweet defending the veracity of his work and the unassailable nature of the document leak:

Then Bob Woodward, Jack Anderson, Sy Hersh, Pam Zekman, Neil Sheehan and every journalism legend ever “lied to their audience” by omitting the extraneous views of their anonymous sources when publishing docs/info they were given by those sources. @willsommer, this is illogical. https://t.co/TEhWHoKxgC

— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) August 14, 2019

Regardless of the desperate spin attempts by those in Google’s pocket, the documents leaked by whistle-blower Vorheis – at great risk to his personal safety – provide all the ammo President Donald Trump needs to bring the hammer down on Big Tech before they can manipulate the results of the elections in 2020.

You Might Like

• 
• 
• 

• 
• 
• 

• 
• 
•