From 1956 to 1971, the FBI ran its own “counterintelligence” unit coded COINTELPRO for short. It infiltrated domestic political movements, inspired false flags, planted false stories, spied on Americans, and defamed and libeled its way to influence against various civil rights and civil liberties movements across the country. It even tried to trigger violence and mob conflicts to destabilize opposing political movements. Its key director for an extended time was Mark Felt, who the world now thinks is a hero, because of the sanctified version of him in Woodward’s Watergate caper story. When the deep state decided to rid itself of Nixon because Nixon tried to de-hooverize the FBI after Hoover’s death, it was Mr. COINTELPRO himself, Mark Felt, who led the effort. Hoover was effective for a reason, and Felt learned what he knew at Hoover’s knee, or maybe on it.
Sally Yates, too, admits she worked hand-in-glove with the FBI counter-intelligence unit that is supposed to be sealed off from political appointees like Yates. Yates conceded she worked with someone from the national security council as well. In other words, Yates was manning the deep state ‘inquiry” into her political adversary, General Mike Flynn, using surveillance obtained without a warrant, unmasked without meeting lawful standards for unmasking, and coordinating an investigation beyond her partisan position without recusal. Indeed, by the liberals’ own logic in calling for Sessions’ recusal (his open advocacy for Trump), Yates, too should have recused herself from conveniently investigating her political adversaries, using unlawfully unmasked surveillance on Americans, and questionable FBI interviews of recent cabinet appointees to run a smear campaign against General Mike Flynn.
According to Yates, her grand evidence of “conspiracy” was Flynn talking to the Russian ambassador about sanctions that cooled the heels of Russia after Obama issued more sanctions against Russia, and then not remembering this brief discussion when asked by FBI agents, agents who are yet to explain what they were doing interviewing Flynn without counsel in the first place on a matter they failed to tell him was under investigation anyway. The grand evidence of possible blackmail: that Flynn once talked to the Russian ambassador in a brief call. What a joke. By that standard, Obama could have been blackmailed in far more creative ways given his unknown past in a range of countries, and his secret negotiations with Iran, including unauthorized ransom payments. Yates, of her Most High Ethics, says she ran to the White House because she was shocked, shocked, to hear a politician say something she thought might be untrue. Where was she for 8 years of Obama?
The FBI claims to be serious about the leaks investigation, but both Clapper and Flynn admitted at the hearing today that neither had even been questioned by the FBI. Yates admitted she reviewed and saw intercepts of Trump, Trump associates and members of Congress, but refused to give details of it. She also admitted she shared this information with “members of the intel community” but refused to identify which ones. Yates went further and said the issue was “a topic of a whole lot of discussion, in DOJ and with other members of the intel community, and discussed it at great length.” Clearly, she is a key witness in the leaks case, but the FBI, supposedly “investigating” the leaks case, hasn’t even talked to her? But they could rush up to interview Flynn days within his appointment on a dubious case? FBI can’t get around to asking questions of Hillary without her lawyers present in an off-the-record case, but they can rush to interview Flynn on a non-existent case? Was that because Yates was really running the case and the agency is anxious to protect her and her allies?
Yates’ testimony revealed she should be the one answering FBI questions, not Flynn. But FBI Director Comey is too busy explaining to everybody how innocent Hillary is.
Married Lincoln Project Co-Founder John Weaver Accused of Grooming Young Men, Offering Jobs for Sex
Well this isn’t a good look.
John Weaver, political consultant and co-founder of The Lincoln Project, has been accused of being a sexual predator who targeted young men.
Conservative author and political commentator Ryan Girdusky piqued curiosity and set off widespread speculation after tweeting late Saturday afternoon that “one of the founding members of the Lincoln Project [offered] jobs to young men in exchange for sex,” adding that “his wife is probably interested” to hear about the allegations.
Maybe I should start talking about one of the founding members of the Lincoln Project offering jobs to young men in exchange for sex… his wife is probably interested https://t.co/vAtUS9aPPl
— Ryan James Girdusky (@RyanGirdusky) January 9, 2021
Although Girdusky did not post screenshots of Weaver’s predatory actions himself, saying he “worked with journalists and reached out to victims asking for them to speak up because it was their story, not mine,” several others spoke up about what they experienced and heard.
Twitter user @JoshPri68522288 was one of the first to speak up, tweeting that “I know who did it, because they did it to me. It was John Weaver.”
@_liberalproject also said that “Weaver used to follow me when I used my real name on here. Out of the blue he DM’d being pushy with personal questions and trying to flirt with me. After I didn’t go along with it, he unfollowed me and never DM’d me since.”
(Screenshots courtesy of @lib_crusher.)
News of the impending allegations was also retweeted by Donald Trump Jr.
The longest Twitter thread on the accusations came from journalist Scott Stedman, who started a Twitter thread that begins as follows: “I don’t want to feed into Don Jr’s nonsense but I do want to tell a story. I followed John Weaver when I started my Twitter account. We exchanged messages, I sent him my stories, chatted about Russia, etc. He wrote a blurb for my book. He offered me some sort of “joint venture” which I wasn’t interested in, so I didn’t respond to his calls.”
Stedman continues: “One day, he DM’d me and said he had ‘advice’. He then proceeded to tell me how ‘hot’ I looked and commented on my profile picture and my hair. He started calling me ‘my boy’. I found it deeply uncomfortable.”
“What he said to me pales in comparison to others with whom Weaver communicated and countless others who have experienced much worse from people in power,” Stedman said.
And there could be much more where that came from…
For those asking why speaking up about this now: There are others, including some who reached out to me in recent days. Many many many many others, some afraid to say anything.
— Scott Stedman (@ScottMStedman) January 10, 2021
Neither The Lincoln Project nor it’s leadership have publicly commented on the accusations yet, including Weaver himself.
Stay tuned as this story develops.
The Swamp2 days ago
Democrats Move to Ban Trump Supporters From Joining the Military and Holding Federal Jobs
Big League Wellness3 days ago
Biden Nullifies Trump Executive Order Issued to Reduce Prices of Insulin and Epinephrine
The Swamp2 days ago
What Happens If John Roberts Decides Not to Preside Over Trump’s Post-Presidency Impeachment Trial?
Congress3 days ago
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Calls Biden a ‘Threat to National Security’, Files Impeachment Resolution
Globalism2 days ago
UK’s Prince Harry Demands Social Media Censorship of Americans
Politics4 days ago
Mitch McConnell Censured by Nelson County, Kentucky Republican Party for Betrayal of President Trump
Big League Economics4 days ago
Pete Buttigieg: Keystone XL Pipeline Workers Need to Get Different Jobs
Immigration3 days ago
“RELEASE THEM ALL:” Tucker Exposes Full Biden Jailbreak Order for Illegal Aliens