RINO Hunter Steve Carra Introduces Legislation Demanding Full Forensic Audit of Ballots in State of Michigan

State representative Steve Carra (R-Three Rivers), a RINO hunter who is challenging pro-impeachment Rep. Fred Upton for U.S. Congress, has introduced legislation demanding a full forensic audit of ballots in the state of Michigan.

UsAgainstMedia interviewed Carra about his legislation that would create a committee to oversee a proper forensic audit in Michigan:

The legislation, House Bill 5091, would create the bipartisan commission consisting of the seven following individuals:

(a) One member appointed by the majority leader of the senate, after consulting with the members of his or her caucus. 

(b) One member appointed by the minority leader of the senate, after consulting with the members of his or her caucus. 

(c) One member appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives, after consulting with the members of his or her caucus. 

(d) One member appointed by the minority leader of the house of representatives, after consulting with the members of his or her caucus. 

(e) The auditor general, or his or her authorized designee. 

(f) One member who was a poll challenger at the 2020 general November election and who is randomly selected and appointed by the major political party whose candidate for secretary of state received the highest number of votes at the immediately preceding general November election at which the secretary of state was elected. 

(g) One member who was a poll challenger at the 2020 general November election and who is randomly selected and appointed by the major political party whose candidate for secretary of state received the second highest number of votes at the immediately preceding general November election at which the secretary of state was elected.”

Big League Politics reported on how Carra filed a lawsuit for election integrity before he was even elected to the state house that was successful in getting SPLC-affiliated Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson to capitulate to his request:

One day after vowing to fight a crucial voter integrity lawsuit in the courts, the Michigan attorney general’s office has conceded to demands that plaintiffs believe will clarify the role of poll challengers in the state.

The case was heard in the Michigan Court of Claims, which springs from shocking #DetroitLeaks revelations that show election workers cackling as their instructor explains how they will be able to use COVID-19 social distancing rules to disenfranchise poll challengers.

Attorneys Philip Ellison and Matt Gronda appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs, state representative candidate Stephen Carra and electoral integrity watchdog Bob Cushman. Assistant attorney general Erik Grill attended on behalf of Michigan attorney general Dana Nessel.

“At this point, your honor, I am happy to report that the parties and the attorneys have been working very diligently this morning to try and reach a resolution, and I’m happy to report that we have,” Gronda said.

He explained that the secretary of state’s office will be sending out an explicit notice before Oct. 29 at 5pm that makes clear the rights of poll challengers and watchers.

Gronda said that the new directive would be approximate to this: “Challengers and poll watchers have certain rights and responsibilities established by Michigan election law. Challengers and poll watchers are required to wear masks that cover the nose and mouth to the extent medically able to do so consistent with the MDHHS order and maintain social distancing while not performing their legal duties.”

“Challengers and poll watchers should maintain at least six feet of distance between themselves and election workers and voters as reasonably possible. However, to the extent that it is necessary to temporarily stand in closer proximity to election workers, to have a challenge heard, to observe the poll book, or perform any other legal duty, challengers and poll watchers are permitted to do so, provided close personal interaction is as brief as possible,” the new directive continues.

“Once a challenge or necessary observation is complete, challengers and poll watchers should resume remaining six feet away from voters and poll workers,” the directive concludes. Gronda noted that the state would be entering into a binding written agreement with the plaintiffs.

Grill noted that the language used by Gronda would not be used in the official directive, showing that the AG’s office might not be acting in good faith while agreeing to this deal.

“We’re not committing to the specific language but in the substance of it. We were working about 15 minutes prior to this hearing so haste doesn’t usually lead to the most clear instructions so there will be some further refinement but fundamentally substantively…there shouldn’t be any problem,” he said.

“Thank you very much for working to resolve this amongst yourselves in the interests of the people of the state of Michigan,” Judge Cynthia Stevens said before concluding the proceedings.”

Voters in Michigan’s 6th Congressional District should consider Carra over RINO Fred Upton, who has repeatedly betrayed his party, his country and his sacred honor.