Connect with us

Deep State

Roger Stone Calls Steve Bannon a ‘Judas’ for Allegedly Giving Contradictory Testimony at His Trial

This feud has gotten personal.

Published

on

There is no love lost between long-time Trump confidant Roger Stone and former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, with an unleashed Stone hurling major accusations toward Bannon on social media now that his gag order is up.

Stone, fresh off a deep state railroading, is accusing Bannon of collaborating with the deep state because of questionable testimony he gave during his trial.

“Steve Bannon is a Judas,” Stone proclaimed in a Facebook post, adding that Bannon “either lied to the Committee which is the exact crime that I am unjustly charged with , or he lied at my trial to assist Robert Mueller‘s dirty cops in their efforts to railroad me because I refused to provide false testimony about President Donald Trump.”

Trending: ANTIFA Leader Complains That ‘Play Time is Over’ After Being Raided by FBI for Allegedly Leading Far-Left Riot

Stone is referencing a New York Post story alleging that Bannon contradicted himself while testifying under oath to the House Intelligence Committee in 2018 and giving testimony during Stone’s trial.

take our poll - story continues below

RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The report claims that Bannon told the court that he discussed WikiLeaks and the organization’s founder Julian Assange with Stone before he became Trump’s campaign manager in Aug. 2016. Bannon reportedly told the House Intelligence Committee that he never discussed WikiLeaks with Stone in Jan. 2018.

“There does appear a glaring and irreconcilable conflict in what Bannon stated in testimony before Congress and the court. What is striking is that this was not a peripheral point but one of the main areas of inquiry,” said Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University Law School professor who was called to testify at Trump’s impeachment hearings.

“He has two diametrically opposite sworn statements in a high-profile controversy with dozens of attorneys in attendance,” Turley said to the New York Post.

Stone is accusing Bannon of making deals with federal spooks in order to protect himself from potential perjury charges for the contradictory testimony.

“I am deeply disappointed by Mr. Bannon’s now-documented betrayal,” Stone said. “I believe the prosecutors suborned perjury by Steve Bannon and I have no idea what deal he may have made for immunity or for non-prosecution.”

Bannon’s attorney William A. Burck maintains that his client committed no wrongdoing and any perceived incongruence in Bannon’s answers is due to the entire investigation being a convoluted mess.

“Steve was asked a series of disjointed, compound and confusing questions over the course of days of statements and testimony. And he was not even provided the emails in question to refresh his memory,” Burck said.

“In contrast, the prosecutors asked proper questions using the relevant emails—which is how an investigation is supposed to be done. The difference lies not in his testimony but in what you get from poor questioning versus proper questioning. As anyone reading the full transcript knows, Steve’s testimony, procured by subpoena, was accurate and consistent,” he added.

Big League Politics broke the story last month of how Stone’s prosecutors deceived witnesses during grand jury testimony. The deep state hoax against President Trump has caused a great deal of collateral damage within the populist right, and the Stone-Bannon feud is another example of that.

Deep State

General Michael Flynn and Friends Show Their Support for QAnon Movement on Independence Day

Now that he has been exonerated, Flynn is getting hardcore.

Published

on

General Michael Flynn is a free man, and he thanks the patriots in the controversial QAnon movement for standing by him throughout his tribulations.

He posted a video of his inner circle giving an oath of patriotism on Independence Day that referenced the popular QAnon slogan “where we go one we go all”:

take our poll - story continues below

RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The liberals are really angry that Flynn is lending credence to the QAnon movement, which they claim trafficks in dangerous conspiracy theories. They are particularly anguished that the QAnon movement keeps growing in strength as various suspicious crises hit the American people right before November’s elections.

“Flynn’s message, though alarming, falls into a larger trend: QAnon online activity has been on the rise since the start of the pandemic. As my colleagues Ali Breland and Sinduja Rangarajan reported last month, Google Trends shows that QAnon search terms like “WWG1WGA” (where we go one, we go all) spiked in March as US businesses started to close. Wikipedia’s QAnon page saw a surge in pageviews in March and April,” writer Jackie Flynn Mogensen wrote for left-wing rag Mother Jones.

Big League Politics has reported on the exoneration of Gen. Flynn, whose railroading by the deep state was ultimately unsuccessful:

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced that they will be dropping the case against General Michael Flynn, which has been marred with corruption and improprieties from its inception.

The Flynn case was a feather in the cap of the special investigation conducted by FBI spook Robert Mueller into Russian collusion. The deep state had hoped to make an example of Flynn, secure a guilty plea from him, and then use it to justify their continued fishing expedition to damage President Donald Trump.

However, things did not turn out the way the entrenched bureaucrats planned. The DOJ announced on Thursday that it is dropping the case “after a considered review of all the facts and circumstances of this case, including newly discovered and disclosed information.”

They came to the conclusion that Flynn’s interview with the FBI was “untethered to, and unjustified by, the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into Mr. Flynn” and that the interview taking place on January 24, 2017 was “conducted without any legitimate investigative basis.”

Jeff Jensen, the U.S. attorney tasked with reviewing Flynn’s case, made the recommendation to Attorney General Bill Barr that the case be dismissed. Barr followed through with Jensen’s recommendation in a prompt fashion.

“Through the course of my review of General Flynn’s case, I concluded the proper and just course was to dismiss the case,” Jensen said in a statement. “I briefed Attorney General Barr on my findings, advised him on these conclusions, and he agreed.”

Last week, President Trump declared that Flynn was “exonerated” due to the release of court documents showing how the FBI acted improperly throughout the case.

Flynn’s exoneration and his stance in favor of QAnon will certainly put some wind beneath the sails of those who have urged to trust the plan.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending