Connect with us

Deep State

Roger Stone Calls Steve Bannon a ‘Judas’ for Allegedly Giving Contradictory Testimony at His Trial

This feud has gotten personal.

Published

on

There is no love lost between long-time Trump confidant Roger Stone and former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, with an unleashed Stone hurling major accusations toward Bannon on social media now that his gag order is up.

Stone, fresh off a deep state railroading, is accusing Bannon of collaborating with the deep state because of questionable testimony he gave during his trial.

“Steve Bannon is a Judas,” Stone proclaimed in a Facebook post, adding that Bannon “either lied to the Committee which is the exact crime that I am unjustly charged with , or he lied at my trial to assist Robert Mueller‘s dirty cops in their efforts to railroad me because I refused to provide false testimony about President Donald Trump.”

Trending: Twitter Suspends US Customs and Border Protection Commissioner For Celebrating the Effectiveness of Trump’s Border Wall

Stone is referencing a New York Post story alleging that Bannon contradicted himself while testifying under oath to the House Intelligence Committee in 2018 and giving testimony during Stone’s trial.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The report claims that Bannon told the court that he discussed WikiLeaks and the organization’s founder Julian Assange with Stone before he became Trump’s campaign manager in Aug. 2016. Bannon reportedly told the House Intelligence Committee that he never discussed WikiLeaks with Stone in Jan. 2018.

“There does appear a glaring and irreconcilable conflict in what Bannon stated in testimony before Congress and the court. What is striking is that this was not a peripheral point but one of the main areas of inquiry,” said Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University Law School professor who was called to testify at Trump’s impeachment hearings.

“He has two diametrically opposite sworn statements in a high-profile controversy with dozens of attorneys in attendance,” Turley said to the New York Post.

Stone is accusing Bannon of making deals with federal spooks in order to protect himself from potential perjury charges for the contradictory testimony.

“I am deeply disappointed by Mr. Bannon’s now-documented betrayal,” Stone said. “I believe the prosecutors suborned perjury by Steve Bannon and I have no idea what deal he may have made for immunity or for non-prosecution.”

Bannon’s attorney William A. Burck maintains that his client committed no wrongdoing and any perceived incongruence in Bannon’s answers is due to the entire investigation being a convoluted mess.

“Steve was asked a series of disjointed, compound and confusing questions over the course of days of statements and testimony. And he was not even provided the emails in question to refresh his memory,” Burck said.

“In contrast, the prosecutors asked proper questions using the relevant emails—which is how an investigation is supposed to be done. The difference lies not in his testimony but in what you get from poor questioning versus proper questioning. As anyone reading the full transcript knows, Steve’s testimony, procured by subpoena, was accurate and consistent,” he added.

Big League Politics broke the story last month of how Stone’s prosecutors deceived witnesses during grand jury testimony. The deep state hoax against President Trump has caused a great deal of collateral damage within the populist right, and the Stone-Bannon feud is another example of that.

Deep State

DOJ Whistleblower Claims FBI Opened Criminal Investigation into ‘Hunter Biden and His Associates’ in 2019

What’s taking this so long?

Published

on

A whistleblower in the Justice Department has told reporter James Rosen that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) opened an investigation into “Hunter Biden and his associates” back in 2019, focusing primarily on money laundering allegations.

Rosen posted on Twitter that the investigation is still ongoing and active today:

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The infamous laptop-from-hell leaks have put Hunter Biden’s dealings back in the public limelight, but it has been public knowledge for years that the hooker-fancying crack abuser was involved with corrupt dealings throughout the world with help from his father.

Before he developed dementia and could string together a coherent thought, Democrat presidential contender Joe Biden even confirmed it during a meeting with the globalist Council on Foreign Relations:

Considering the evidence against Hunter Biden seems pretty airtight, this begs the question: What is taking the FBI so long with their investigation?

Based on how the FBI has handled their inquiry into the origins of the Russian collusion scandal, individuals hoping to see justice delivered to the Biden crime family should not hold their breaths.

Big League Politics has reported on how Attorney General Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham have completely dropped the ball on the biggest scandal in U.S. history, Russia-gate:

Those who “trusted the plan” that Attorney General Bill Barr was going to clean up the deep state and put corrupt actors from the Obama administration to justice are learning a hard lesson in how the swamp works.

Barr, who initially served under globalist President George H.W. Bush and was responsible for orchestrating the heinous Ruby Ridge atrocity, is reportedly not going to charge anyone from the Obama regime for the “unmasking” of their political opponents in the Russia-gate scandal.

According to the Washington Post, the investigation ordered by Barr has concluded without “finding any substantive wrongdoing.” U.S. Attorney John Bash is the man who was tasked with this investigation by Barr, and he is allegedly using his authority to protect the deep state from being held accountable for the greatest crime in American history. Barr’s office is hiding Bash’s findings from the public.

Bash announced his departure from the Department of Justice on Oct. 5 but never mentioned the unmasking probe. The AG’s office has seemingly done everything in its power to keep this information under wraps, similar to what has been done with the probe into the origins of the Russian collusion scandal that is being conducted by U.S. Attorney John Durham…

President Trump is getting the picture that he along with the American public have been had by AG Barr and other veteran deep staters.

“If that’s the case, I’m very disappointed,” Trump told Rush Limbaugh last week. “I think it’s a terrible thing, and I will say it to [Barr’s] face.”

If President Trump loses in November, Russia-gate will be swept under the rug, and the obscene and illicit operations conducted against Trump by his political opposition will be legitimized forevermore.

The sad truth is that the Biden crime family and all other Democrat crooks will get off scot free if President Trump does not win re-election next week.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending