Connect with us

Deep State

Roger Stone: Eric Swalwell Is Lying, I Never Amended My Testimony

Published

on

In a Big League Politics interview conducted prior to the charges against him, political strategist Roger Stone laid out how Eric Swalwell, Democrat from California, used MSNBC to create the talking point that Stone “amended” his House Intelligence Committee testimony.

Categorically false, says Stone. He never amended anything, merely provided more information.

“Congressman Eric Swalwell told MSNBC that I lied to the House Intelligence Committee and that I “amended” my testimony three times. This is categorically false! I supplemented my testimony three times – in the first submission I identified my source for the Significance and October timing of the Wikileaks exposures as Randy Credico (see text messages I released proving this), in the second submission I reported an approach by an FBI informant in May 2016 who attempted unsuccessfully to sell me information regarding Hillary Clinton and in the third instance I asked the committee to correct their final report because they omitted the word “the” from my tweet “the” Podesta’s time in the barrel will come. Who’s lying?”

Trending: Black Rifle Coffee Does Not Support Second Amendment Hero Kyle Rittenhouse

There was also a leak of House Intelligence Committee exclusive information to The Atlantic reporter Natasha Bertrand.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

President Donald Trump political adviser Roger Stone appears to be innocent of colluding with anyone, including the Russian government, with regard to his 2016 promotion of Julian Assange’s Wikileaks dump of Democratic National Committee emails.

Was Stone actively colluding with Assange or Putin? Stone says no, his source is named Randy Credico, a comedian and activist.

Here are the text messages between Stone and Credico, which Stone says clears him of any accusation of Russian collusion.

Deep State

WOW: John Durham is Reportedly Dropping Russia-Gate Investigation to Appease Biden ‘Administration’

Durham’s probe ends as an empty flop.

Published

on

U.S. Attorney John Durham is reportedly giving up on the Russia-gate investigation, as he is too scared to delve into the truth now that Biden has been announced as president-elect by the globalists.

Thus far, Durham’s investigation has been a huge bust. His work has only resulted in the prosecution of one individual – former FBI Attorney Kevin Clinesmith – for making or using “any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry.”

Outside of this nobody, there have been no prosecutions that have resulted from Durham’s Russia-gate investigation despite the laundry list of evidence showing wrongdoing.

Sean Davis of The Federalist has reported that the investigation is over. Durham is apparently quitting because of cowardice.

Big League Politics has reported on Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch blowing the whistle on Durham’s failure to do his job and investigate what was arguably the biggest crime in U.S. history prior to the vote steal:

Trump supporters are waiting with baited breath for U.S. Attorney John Durham to come out with his explosive findings in regards to his investigation into the origins of the Russian collusion probe against President Trump.

According to Judicial Watch founder Tom Fitton, Trump supporters are getting taken for a ride. Fitton said during a recent appearance on Fox Business’ “Lou Dobbs Tonight” that Barr and Durham are making no progress on investigating what very well may be the worst criminal conspiracy in U.S. history.

“You know, my concern is it’s been, what, sixteen-plus months since Durham was appointed and only now is he questioning Mr. Brennan,” Fitton said.

Fitton said that he is inclined to believe disgraced former CIA Director John Brennan when he says that he is not a person of interest in Durham’s investigation.

“I don’t see grand juries operating. I don’t see a bunch of witnesses coming in. I don’t see lawyers complaining about their clients being brought in before Durham,” Fitton said.

He said that the Mueller investigation was run much more thoroughly than Durham’s so-called investigation, the goal of which appears to be protecting the deep state.

“You know when the government is being pressure on witnesses and subjects and that is not evident here,” Fitton said, adding that it is his opinion that Durham is “not doing the work” needed to bring deep state criminals to justice.

Fitton did not object to Dobbs’ characterization that he is calling the Durham a “sham.”

“I’ll have to tell you. I’m a little concerned that the FBI is no longer an investigative agency because if this is the way they operate, it’s going to take them decades to deal with anything of real complexity,” Dobbs said.

It seems that Durham, and his boss Attorney General Bill Barr, were just deep state hacks all along. So much for “Trust the Plan,” huh?

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending