Connect with us

Fake News Media

Ronan Farrow Discredited For Shoddy Report on Second Accuser

Published

on

Mia Farrow’s son Ronan Farrow is facing heavy criticism for his New Yorker report with Jane Mayer detailing the alleged memories of Deborah Ramirez, who claims that Brett Kavanaugh exposed himself at a high school party.

Even the mainstream media is being tough on Farrow, likely because the shoddiness of the second accuser report stands to threaten the thin credibility of the entire Resistance movement’s plans to sink Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court.

Politico reports: “On ABC’s Good Morning America on Monday morning, Farrow said, “We wouldn’t have run this if we didn’t have a careful basis of people who had heard at the time and found her credible.” Host George Stephanopoulos replied: “But by your own admission, no eye witnesses of the incident.” A highly placed story on the Fox News website titled, “‘LAZY AT BEST’: Mag’s flimsy reporting on Kavanaugh accuser has critics howling,” called the New Yorker report “sketchy” and quoted several people — mostly conservatives — from Twitter who agreed. In another example, The National Review’s Charles C.W. Cooke wrote that he was “struggling to remember reading a less responsible piece of ‘journalism’ in a major outlet.” Breitbart, The Daily Wire and The Daily Caller all weighed in too.”

Trending: Homosexual Cop Gets $10 Million Taxpayer Payout Because He Did Not Receive a Promotion

Politico passage ends

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Have a hot tip for Big League Politics?

Got a hot news tip for us? Photos or video of a breaking story? Send your tips, photos and videos to tips@bigleaguepolitics.com. All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff.

Have something to say? Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions@bigleaguepolitics.com.

You Might Like

Fake News Media

Liberal Media Freaks Out as Tom Cotton Questions Coronavirus Origins

Mainstream media seems more concerned with Cotton’s questions than China’s censorship.

Published

on

Mainstream media entities are claiming Republican Senator Tom Cotton is trafficking in “conspiracy theories” for questioning the source of the coronavirus’ origins.

Cotton has questioned the official narrative stating that the deadly coronavirus outbreak originated in a wet food market in Wuhan, China. He’s suggested that it’s possible the disease originated in a Chinese government “superlab” a few miles away that conducts research in human infectious diseases.

Cotton has pointed out that the Chinese government is consistently declining offers of scientific and medical aid to combat the lethal epidemic, raising suspicions as to their transparency.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Such a suggestion is enough to label Cotton a “conspiracy theorist” in the eyes of outlets such as Slate and the New York Times. A headline from the Times called Cotton’s question a “fringe theory,” even though Cotton references epidemiologists who believe the virus didn’t originally enter human transmission at the food market. The Washington Post also ran a story Monday claiming that Cotton is trafficking in conspiracy theories.

It’s remarkable that nominally respectable media entities such as the New York Times are quick to dismiss entirely plausible theories of the coronavirus’s origins. If anything, an official narrative on the virus’s origins from the authoritarian communist government of China should be treated with inherent skepticism, especially considering that China is widely suspected of covering up the gravity of the situation and even arresting reporters who seek to document the epidemic and the government’s response.

Certainly it’s possible that the disease spread into humans from the consumption of animals such as bats, a prevailing theory for the virus’s origins. But the general public has no reason to entirely discount any plausible theory for the origins of the virus.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


You Might Like

Trending