Scientific Experts Admit COVID-19 Tests are Too Sensitive to Virus, Resulting in Countless False Positives

Pennsylvania Commonwealth microbiologist Kerry Pollard performs a manual extraction of the coronavirus inside the extraction lab at the Pennsylvania Department of Health Bureau of Laboratories on Friday, March 6, 2020.

Scientific experts are raising concerns about the efficacy of COVID-19 tests, claiming that they are too sensitive to the virus and recording an astronomical amount of false positives as a result.

The experts are claiming that people taking the tests are showing up with “positive” results even though there is virtually no way they could ever spread COVID-19 with the negligable amount of the virus in their system. The tests are picking up trace levels of COVID-19 and reporting them as positive tests, which fuels the media-driven hysteria.

The PCR tests that have been most regularly used for COVID-19 screenings gives a yes-or-no response regarding infections. The experts claim that this is woefully inaccurate to make public health considerations.

“We’ve been using one type of data for everything, and that is just plus or minus — that’s all. We’re using that for clinical diagnostics, for public health, for policy decision-making,” said Dr. Michael Mina, who is an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

Dr. Mina is calling for more COVID-19 tests but not under the regime that is currently in place throughout the country right now.

“In fact, we should be ramping up testing of all different people,” he said, “but we have to do it through whole different mechanisms.”

The Trump administration announced last week that they will be purchasing 150 million rapid tests, which experts say is more accurate because they determine how much of the virus is in a particular individual. This information can more accurately determine who needs to be quarantined.

“It’s really irresponsible, I think, to forgo the recognition that this is a quantitative issue,” Dr. Mina said.

Sets of testing data in Massachusetts, Nevada and New York show that up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus. Of course, this news is only being released now that the vast majority of the public has already lost their souls to the chaos and confusion of the scamdemic.

Big League Politics has reported about many abnormalities with the COVID-19 testing numbers, including widespread reporting errors in Florida that were used to keep the shutdown going:

The Florida Department of Health is scrambling after fraud was discovered in how COVID-19 testing rates were being reported across the state.

After the health department released a report showing a stunning statewide positivity rate of 11 percent, analysis of the numbers revealed severe irregularities. Many labs reported 100 percent positivity, meaning that every test came back positive.

In addition to the labs reporting 100 percent positivity, there were other testing facilities that reported abnormal levels of positive tests. FOX 35 found that Centra Care reported that 83 people who submitted tests were all counted as positive. The Orlando Veteran’s Affairs Medical Center reported a 76 percent positivity rate, NCF Diagnostics reported tests at a 88 percent positivity rate, and Orlando Health reported a 98 percent positivity rate.

Orlando Health has admitted that the results from the health department’s report are dubious. They said that their positivity rate was only 9.4 percent, not 98 percent as it was shown in the report. This casts major doubt regarding the accuracy of the total cases that have been reported in Florida.

The fake news has used Florida as an example to bolster their COVID-19 mass hysteria due to all of the supposed cases that were popping up throughout the state…

Reports of these irregularities drive a stake through the heart of the establishment’s fear-driven narrative regarding COVID-19.

The COVID-19 scamdemic may be the cruelest hoax in the history of mankind. China, the Democrat Party, the fake news media, and many other collaborators are directly to blame.

Share: