Connect with us

Campaign 2020

SEXIST BERNIE? Pocahontas Claims Sanders Told Her That a Woman Cannot Win the Presidency

Published

on

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), who has billed himself a crusader for equality throughout his years as a career politician in Washington D.C., reportedly told Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) that a woman cannot win the presidency behind the scenes.

Sanders and Warren, two socialists who have been long-time colleagues, met in December 2018 at Warren’s apartment to discuss their presidential ambitions. They allegedly agreed to be amicable throughout their upcoming presidential runs, refusing to engage in dirty politics against one another. They have largely lived up to their pact, but that may be changing in the crucial days to come.

Warren told Sanders that she would be the best candidate to take on President Trump due to her strength in appealing to female voters and her credibility pertaining to economic matters. This is when Sanders reportedly replied that he believes a female candidate does not have what it takes to defeat President Trump in 2020.

Trending: Black Rifle Coffee Does Not Support Second Amendment Hero Kyle Rittenhouse

Sanders categorically denies the allegations, which he claims were based on second-hand sources that were not in the room while he was engaging in the conversation with Warren over a year ago.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“It is ludicrous to believe that at the same meeting where Elizabeth Warren told me she was going to run for president, I would tell her that a woman couldn’t win,” Sanders said.

“It’s sad that, three weeks before the Iowa caucus and a year after that private conversation, staff who weren’t in the room are lying about what happened. What I did say that night was that Donald Trump is a sexist, a racist and a liar who would weaponize whatever he could. Do I believe a woman can win in 2020? Of course! After all, Hillary Clinton beat Donald Trump by 3 million votes in 2016,” he added.

However, Warren released an official statement claiming that Sanders did in fact make the sexist comment during their private meeting.

“Among the topics that came up was what would happen if Democrats nominated a female candidate. I thought a woman could win; he disagreed,” Warren said in the statement.

Sanders’ alleged assertion may be bearing out if polling is any indicator. With the Iowa caucuses only weeks away, Sanders and former Vice President Joe Biden are surging while Warren lags behind in fourth place. She cannot even get ahead of South Bend, IN Mayor Pete Buttigieg, who was a relative unknown before making the decision to run for president.

Despite her lack of momentum, Warren is not giving up on her ambitions for the presidency. She is continuing to push identity politics as much as she possibly can, as it is her calling card going back many decades to when she infamously faked being an Indian to advance in politics and academia.

Warren said last month during an appearance in Las Vegas, NV that she has “lived enough of my life with men, and it’s mostly been men, telling me to sit down and be quiet.”

“Over and over, we are told that women are not allowed to be angry. It makes us unattractive to powerful men who want us to be quiet,” Warren wrote in a campaign email last year that had the subject line: “I am angry and I own it.”

But based on her recent performance in the polls, the U.S. voting public, including the extremist Democrats, do not want a shrill woman to lead the country in the Oval Office. Sanders may have been correct with his alleged statement that a woman cannot defeat President Trump. The Democrat Party is showing itself to be the party of old white men when the rubber meets the road!

Campaign 2020

WATCH: Fulton County Poll Manager Susan Voyles Recounts Election Improprieties in Georgia Recount

Shocking allegations.

Published

on

A Georgia woman who submitted a sworn affidavit regarding election improprieties has recorded a new video detailing her experience assisting in Georgia’s recount of the 2020 election ballots.

Susan Voyles is a veteran Georgia elections poll manager who submitted a sworn affidavit in a Trump campaign lawsuit against Georgia’s Secretary of State. She recounts some of the most significant improprieties she witnessed participating in the recount of Georgia’s election, which Joe Biden supposedly won by around 13,000 votes.

Voyles, who has done elections work for twenty years, describes counting an unusual “pristine” batch of absentee ballots that were cast 98% for Joe Biden. She states that the packaging containing these absentee ballots was unlabeled by the Secretary of State.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

We came to one batch- it was surprising, it was stark- having done this for years, I’m very familiar with how the ballots work, how they fold, how they feel, their general appearance- these ballots appeared as though the first one had been bubbled in by a person and all of them were replicated, exactly the same.

We were further alarmed that in our count 98% of these ballots were for Joseph R. Biden. Two were for Donald Trump.

That’s a very odd count. My coworker agreed with me that there was something very unusual about these ballots.”

Voyles even suspects that the unusual ballots she counted in the recount were filled out with a marking device.

Every single ballot was absolutely identical, and they appeared to be printed with some sort of marking device.

Unfortunately, it’s very difficult for elections integrity monitors to verify the veracity of these supposedly pristine absentee ballots. They’ve been separated from the envelopes that contain the supposed legal information of the voters that cast them, and they can’t be reunited with them.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending