Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

The Swamp

SHOCK VIDEO: Democrat Asks Strzok, Did You Use ‘Magical Bullet’ to Stop Trump?

The Democrat Congressman used violent imagery towards President Trump

Published

on

During the highly anticipated public Congressional hearing of disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok’s testimony, a Democrat Congressman used a loaded term that is raising some eyebrows.

Luis Gutiérrez, who has represented Illinoi’s 4th Congressional District since 1993 took his time during the hearing to ask Strzok, “you had a magical bullet to derail [Donald Trump]…did you use it?”

In the last two weeks, the Democrats have amped up their divisive and violent rhetoric against the right, following in Congresswoman Maxine Waters’ path of calling for Trump supporters and Trump administration officials to be confronted and harassed in public.

It is indisputable that Rep. Gutiérrez’s choice of words during the hearing in which he asked why a bullet wasn’t used to derail President Trump were extremely inappropriate, and yet again another shocking display of the unhinged Trump Derangement Syndrome that has consumed the Democrat Party.

Trending: DOCUMENT: Peter Strzok Was CIA And FBI At The Same Time, Say Experts

Rep. Gutiérrez’s question is another example of the violent rhetoric that is being utilized by the Left and elected Democrat officials to subliminally increase animosity, violence, and hatred towards President Trump and Republicans.

The Left will tell you that Rep. Gutiérrez’s misspoke, but you can judge for yourself.

Is it ever acceptable to use imagery that invokes thoughts of gun violence when discussing the President of the United States, or any elected official?  No. It is not.

WATCH:

 

 

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

The Swamp

Sebastian Gorka Blasts Trey Gowdy as ‘Grandstanding Fake’

Published

on

A national security strategist and former strategist for President Donald J. Trump blasted Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) over Gowdy’s statements to the media regarding Trump’s meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, Finland tomorrow.

“This why I can’t take Gowdy seriously,” Gorka tweeted. “The ‘great prosecutor’ had Hillary testify on Benghazi & with what result? ZIP. Now his advice 2 [President Trump] is ask former KGB colonel Putin where he can “pick up” his GRU colleagues? What a grandstanding FAKE.”

Gorka has a point. Gowdy, once known for his sharp tongue and pointed questions during the House Select Committee on Benghazi hearings, has accomplished little in his time as a Congressman.

“I would ask the president to give some serious consideration, your first request of Vladimir Putin needs to be, ‘Tell us which airport we can pick up the 25 Russians that tried to interfere with the fundamentals of our democracy,'” Gowdy told Margaret Brennan on “Face the Nation” on Sunday.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein indicted 12 Russians on Friday over alleged “hacking” of the DNC during the 2016 campaign cycle.

But the fact remains: More than 700 days have passed since the “Russian collusion” narrative was first injected into the mainstream, and not one iota of evidence exists suggesting that Trump had anything to do with Russian meddling in the election.

Still, Gowdy wants to talk tough.

“If you really claim that you had nothing to do with it, then you should be as shocked as we were that your military being used to impact our election, tell us where your going to extradite those folks because an American grand jury indicted them for undermining our democracy.”

Of course, none of that has been proven either. An indictment is not an indication of guilt. And lest we forget, Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller actually indicted a Russian company that does not exist as part of his partisan witch hunt.

Yet Gowdy, a prosecutor who should indeed be a bit skeptical, seems to be taking Mueller at his word and inferring guilt from an indictment.

Gowdy talked tough at the open hearing of disgraced former FBI agent Peter Strzok last week regarding pre-election bias in the nation’s highest law enforcement agency. Still, frustrated Americans have nothing to show for it.

He let Lisa Page, Strzok’s lover and confidante, also a disgraced FBI agent, ignore a congressional subpoena to appear before Congress on Wednesday.

Meanwhile, former Secretary of State Hillary R. Clinton never faced any consequences for perjuring herself on live television during the very Benghazi hearings over which Gowdy presided, and has never been seriously investigated for any of the myriad of other misdeeds related to her scam charity, The Clinton Global Initiative.

Just another day in the swamp.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×

Thanks for sharing!

We invite you to become a Big League Politics insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Send this to a friend