One of the very few reporters to even try to understand what was happening with the Trump phenomenon in 2016 was Salena Zito, then of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. While never definitively predicting Trump would win, she nevertheless spent all her time off the beaten path of all the other “pool” reporters and visited Erie County, Pennsylvania, Ashtabula County, Ohio, Lee County, Iowa and countless other places where the fake newsies refused to go without proper shots.
In The Great Revolt with data guru Brad Todd, she has written one of the better analyses of the 2016—my own How Trump Won with Joel Pollak, excepted, of course. Zito and Todd not only rely on her extensive anecdotal reporting, but also conducted a rather significant survey, called the Great America Survey, of some 2,000 Trump voters. Naturally, the fake news media has overlooked this, for the results are not comforting to the establishment class of either party. Getting to those results, however, involves an excellent history of the Republican Party post-2012 and the attempts by its off-base leadership to foist “immigration reform” on the American public. Throwing their weight behind Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio, the GOPe thought it had the ticket to lure Hispanic voters away from the Democrats and to their side.
Until Donald Trump came down the escalator.
They note that in Trump’s announcement speech, he didn’t use the term “conservative” or “liberal” once, yet his candidacy immediately took off. Why? Zito asked individuals to tell their stories, then she and Todd polled the much larger pool to arrive at quantitative support for the “qualitative” answer she got.
One of the first things that sets The Great Revolt apart from most other election books is the authors’ understanding of Trump’s use of social media: “Trump’s preference for making his newsworthy—and often outlandish and almost always candid—statements via his Twitter account enabled him both to speak directly to his audience and to command the full attention, and agenda, of the press corps.” This is the first real appreciation I’ve seen for the fact that regardless of what Trump said—including whether he committed a “gaffe” or insulted someone—the fact that the fake news media was covering him was always the bigger story. As Jonathan Allen and Arnie Parnes wrote in Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign, Trump so dominated the news cycle that even if Hillary had had anything useful or appealing to say (she didn’t) it couldn’t break through the 24/7 Trump tweeting. This point, which is the central focus of The Great Revolt, is critical because it is ongoing. It explains why Trump so far in just over 500 days has accomplished more than any other president since George Washington in so little time. While the media obsesses with Trump the man (and Trump the tweeter) his policies consistently sail along, unencumbered, under the radar!
Some argue that the constant negative drumbeat of attention keeps Trump’s approval numbers artificially low. As of today, he was at 46% in Rasmussen, 45% in Gallup, and in the high 40s in all other polls except Quinnipiac. In all likelihood, he is well above those numbers and probably hovering in the high 50s, based on what we know of polling bias in the election. Some pollsters still haven’t learned, with Quinnipiac using a massive Democrat oversample to get Trump into the high 30s. But as we learned in November 2016, lying about reality doesn’t change reality.
Zito and Todd divide the Trump electorate into groups such as “Red-Blooded and Blue-Collared,” “King Cyrus Christians,” “Perot-istas,”“Rough Rebounders,” “Girl Gun Power,” “Rotary Reliables,” and “Silent Suburban Moms.” Almost universally, individuals from these groups distrusted both political parties (and among Trump voters they by a margin of 2:1 trust Trump more than Republicans in Congress to do the right thing for the country. Only two percent trust the media to do the right thing for the country.) As one Trump voter said, he saw problems coming years ago: “This did not happen overnight, people didn’t wake up on election night and say ‘I’m going to do something different.” In fact, many if not most of the Trump voters Zito interviewed had voted for Barack Obama. Twice.
More important to readers today are the updates Zito includes of her subjects views after the election. One Wisconsin voter said, “if he is standing up for us, I will stand up for him. It really is just that simple.” Another Michigan woman said “poor Trump is trying to do everything good, and everybody’s trying to stop him.” One lifelong Democrat voter from Ohio said the Trump rally gave her goose bumps. She took her whole family. This is another gem that Zito points out, that the Trump rallies were key events in introducing him to large numbers of people who simply didn’t trust the news. The point is, Zito found no evidence whatsoever that apart from utter and clear betrayal on probably several key issues, Trump’s supporters are behind him to the end.
And what are those key issues? Interestingly, “drain the swamp” isn’t one, and “lock her up” isn’t one. Rather, Todd’s survey found “bringing back manufacturing jobs” was the highest concern (leading as the top issue with 34% of the voters, “protecting Medicare and Social security was #2 at 30%, and Supreme Court judges was third at 28%. Only 7% said building the wall was the top concern. Trump’s voters as of 2017 remained extremely optimistic, with 87% saying they had a sunny view of the future, and only 12% were pessimistic. Approval among Trump’s voters was through the roof, at 86% with another 1% “don’t know or refused to answer.” In short, there is no erosion of Trump’s bloc of support at all, and many of those interviewed had friends and relatives who voted for Hillary or Johnson and now found that they liked Trump.
The Great Revolt provides excellent insight, and shows what real reporting can accomplish, especially when wedded to solid data mining.
Larry Schweikart is the co-author of the New York Times #1 bestseller A Patriot’s History of the United States with Michael Allen and How Trump Won with Joel Pollak.
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
Roger Stone Files Motion to Remove Judge From Controversial Case
Stone was sentenced to 40 months in prison this week.
Roger Stone has filed a motion to remove the presiding judge from his controversial court case on Saturday, just days after the longtime Republican political operative was sentenced to a stringent 40-month prison term for lying to federal investigators.
Stone is seeking a new trial, and his legal team is pointing out evidence of Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s bias against their client as cause for a new judge. Jackson complimented the jury after they handed on the lengthy prison sentence on Stone for process crimes, stating that they had “served with integrity.”
There’s further reason to believe that Stone, a former adviser to President Donald Trump in the early days of his 2016 Presidential campaign, has been made a victim of deep-seated political bias during the trial, one of the few to result from Robert Mueller’s lengthy and ultimately empty Russian interference probe.
At least one juror has stepped forward to bemoan an effort by the DOJ to dial back aggressive prosecutors seeking to place Stone in prison for an even lengthier amount of time. Juror Tomeka Heart is a committed Democrat former congressional candidate. She’s posted at length on her personal social media about her personal dislike of President Trump.
It’s rather shocking that a juror with such a distinguishable political affiliation wouldn’t be passed up in a court case with direct national political implications. Stone’s lawyers mention Heart’s partisan affiliation in their court filing for a new trial and judge.
Stone currently remains free, pending his filing for a new trial.
Tucker Carlson discussed the pressing ethical lapses surrounding Stone’s conviction and sentencing during a segment on his show Thursday night.
Trending on BLP
Politics3 days ago
VIDEO: Indiana Teacher Claims She Was Fired for Exposing Left-Wing ‘Social Emotional Learning’ Scheme
Culture3 days ago
New York Library Plans LGBT Re-Education Program After Community Rejects ‘Drag Queen Story Hour’
Campaign 20202 days ago
Pete Buttigieg Called Out By His Own Brother-in-Law on Tucker: “Anti-God”
News2 days ago
Female Prisoner Sues Prison After a Transgender Inmate Allegedly Raped Her
News2 days ago
Former Bernie Sanders Consultant Arrested for Planting Weapons Inside of Jail in Order to Break Inmates out of Prison
Border Security2 days ago
ICE Defies California Sanctuary Law, Makes Arrests at Courthouse
News4 days ago
Demographic Collapse: U.S. Fertility Hits All-Time Low
Border Security2 days ago
Gov. Ron DeSantis Puts Anti-E-Verify Republicans On Notice
Campaign 20202 days ago
Mitt Romney Admits: Trump Likely to Be Re-Elected
News2 days ago
Michael Bloomberg Wants to Buy off Texas in Order to Destroy the Second Amendment
News2 days ago
KNOCKOUT: UFC President Dana White Gives Speech Praising Donald Trump
News3 days ago
Britain Kicks the Bums Out by Unveiling New Skill-Based Immigration System