Connect with us

Fake News Media

Soros-Funded Propaganda Outlet Claims Tucker Carlson’s Anti-War Stance is Motivated by Racism

It’s now racist to be anti-war.

Published

on

Media Matters, a propaganda outlet funded by infamous progressive financier George Soros, is claiming that the anti-war stance of Fox News host Tucker Carlson is motivated by bigotry. Blogger Madeline Peltz wrote an article on Thursday saying that Carlson’s “anti-war posture has been racist since the Bush era.”

“He objects not to the human cost of another endless, pointless war in the Middle East or the fact that the government lied to Americans for decades to justify these neo-colonial adventures. Instead, Carlson would rather direct our aggression at migrants, Mexicans, and homeless people than Iranians and Iraqis,” Peltz wrote.

Peltz was triggered by Carlson’s assertion that there are more pressing domestic policies that need to be addressed – such as immigration or the opiate crisis – than fighting foreign wars of dubious merit.

Trending: 36-Year-Old Woman ‘is Gang Raped’ by Migrants ‘After Stopping to Talk to Them about Their Situation’

“In this case, the very people demanding action against Iran tonight, the ones telling you the Persian menace is the greatest threat we face, are the very same ones demanding that you ignore the invasion of America now in progress from the south,” Carlson said on the January 2 episode of his titular Fox News program.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“The millions, the tens of millions, of foreign nationals living among us illegally; the torrent, more significantly, of Mexican narcotics that has killed and disabled entire generations of Americans — nobody cares, in case you haven’t noticed,” he added.

Peltz was also triggered by Carlson’s assertion that “our own country frays and degrades and in some places falls apart completely” as “Washington obsesses over the internal politics of nations thousands of miles from here.” She is apparently peeved that Carlson is willing to address a homelessness crisis in California that has quickly become a public health nightmare.

Peltz attributed Carlson’s rhetoric with influencing President Trump to “conduct a sweeping crackdown on homelessness in California,” which could include “razing existing tent camps for the homeless” and putting homeless individuals in mental institutions.

“For Tucker Carlson, the goal of enacting violence on people in and around the United States supersedes all others. That is why he is opposed to war in Iran. And this position is not new to him — he’s objected to American intervention abroad on racist grounds throughout his career,” she wrote.

She pointed to joking comments that Carlson made while appearing on the Bubba the Love Sponge Show over a decade ago as proof of his dastardly racism.

“We should not oppose war so that the federal government can drop a dragnet on homeless people in urban areas and punish them for their poverty,” Peltz wrote.

“Instead, we should say loud and clear: War is a moral abomination and Americans should de-escalate this conflict because we value the humanity of Iranian and Iraqi civilians and American service members,” she concluded.

However, as we saw during the Obama regime, liberals do not oppose war on any philosophical or humanitarian grounds. They largely supported Obama’s regime change war in Libya that emboldened ISIS, caused the Benghazi disaster, and unleashed a migrant crisis that threatens the future of Europe.

Meanwhile, Carlson has been consistent in opposing foreign intervention throughout his many years as a cable news analyst. Perhaps that’s why he’s the ratings king while Soros-funded propaganda rags struggle to stay afloat.

Fake News Media

Democrats’ Expert on Misinformation is CNN Hack Soledad O’Brien Who Has Pushed Fake News Incessantly for Years

The Democrats are shamelessly Orwellian.

Published

on

CNN propagandist Soledad O’Brien appeared before Congress on Wednesday as the Democrats’ expert on combating “misinformation.”

During the hearing, she called for her competitors to be censored and for alternative perspectives from the globalist-mandated consensus to be crushed.

“When news organizations make decisions based on ratings rather than responsible reporting, disinformation flourishes in dangerous ways,” O’Brien said while appearing before Congress.

“Cover the fact that lies and propaganda are being disseminated, but do not book people to lie on your show, because it elevates them and presents a lie as another side. Stop posing every story as having two sides, some stories, in fact, have many many sides, and are more complicated. And also, lies don’t have a side,’ she added, describing her vision for how news should be covered.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

However, if O’Brien’s advice were taken by newsrooms, she would never be allowed on anymore due to her record of spreading reckless conspiracy theories about Trump being a Russian asset and other nonsense.

News aggregator @amuse posted some of O’Brien’s greatest hits on the fake news leader over the past few years:

Big League Politics has reported on other times in which O’Brien humiliated herself by posting falsehoods:

As usual, members of our esteemed media were caught lying on Wednesday, this time about the motivations for President Donald J. Trump’s visit to Iraq to visit troops.

Much ado was made when Trump did not visit Iraq on Christmas Day. NBC said that he was the first president not to visit the troops as Christmastime, only to correct themselves after Trump left for Iraq late Tuesday night. This led leftists conclude that the media had “shamed” Trump into visiting our fine soldiers.

“Shaming him seems to work,” CNN’s Soledad O’Brien said in reply to a Tweet by Brit Hume.

Hume had noted that by the time left-wing actress had blasted Trump for not visiting the troops, he had already visited them. Hume blasted O’Brien for her apparent lack of understanding of the concept of time.

“Yes Ma’am,” he said. “Trump read this Tweet when it was posted and time-traveled himself back to yesterday and flew to Iraq. Genius take.”

… What was wrong was the assumption that Trump had to be “shamed” to visiting the war zone. Embarrassingly, these leftists were proved wrong by leftist POLITICO.

“According to a White House official, the Trump administration had been planning the trip for more than six weeks,” said a Wednesday POLITICO piece.

Of course, the piece chided Trump for not being able to keep his trip a secret, citing two of Trump’s remarks about a potential trip to a war zone. 

The Democrats are shameless in pushing their Orwellian agenda. They are at war with objective reality and will stoop to unfathomable depths to achieve absolute power.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending