Connect with us

Big League National Security

SOURCES: China was the DEEP STATE PLAN B To Blame For Wikileaks Leak

Published

on

The Deep State has been hard at work since late 2016 and all of 2017 with China. We reported that something is definitely going on when we see that the SEC has a sudden interest in China and how Brennan’s Chinese operatives in 2017 were being picked off the grid. Why? Plan B.

It’s no secret that hackers broke into the computer systems of Barack Hussein Obama  and that of John McCain’s campaign teams during the US presidential race and stole a considerable amount of files that US government cyberecerts claimed was a Chinese orchestrated event. Both the  FBI  and Secret Service had informed both Obama and McCain in early 2008 before the elections that their computer networks  had been hacked and that a large amount of information was retrieved from the campaign networks.

“You have been compromised, and a serious amount of files have been loaded off your system,” an FBI agent said, according to a report in Newsweek magazine.

Trending: HMM: Michelle Obama was Desperate Not to be Photographed in a Bikini as First Lady

China hacking and getting our information is a national security threat, it’s not something new and it’s something ongoing. Specifically, in the summer leading up to the 2008 elections Josh Bolten the White House Chief of staff to then President Bush informed David Plouffe — Barack Hussein Obama’s campaign manager — of the threat and incident. He specifically said “You have a real problem … you have to deal with it.”  This was first reported by Newsweek and they made mention that both the Obama and McCain campaigns hired private cybersecurity companies to investigate the hacks.

A Chinese flag flutters outside Google’s China headquarters in Beijing, China, Wednesday, Jan. 13, 2010. Google Inc. will stop censoring its search results in China and may pull out of the country completely after discovering that computer hackers had tricked human-rights activists into exposing their e-mail accounts to outsiders. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan)

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

In June of 2011 Google put out a statement stating that a recent cyber attack by China was a lot larger and more vast in data collection than that of the previous election year of 2008.  Specifically, they made note that this attack included many gmail attacks specifically that of US government officials.  As the investigations they led in mid 2011 showed, not only did they have access to a lot of data on government systems but they hacked the gmail account as well as a military contractor that supplied unmanned aerial vehicles.

This sounds eerily familiar to the 2016 elections where servers and emails were hacked and to make it even more astounding Fusion GPS at the time was also hired to “dig dirt” on Mitt Romney.  To make this rerun even more familiar and to illustrate just how quickly the American people forget with the help of the orchestrated MSM narratives, during the 2008 elections when Obama was attacking Palin with “completely false” and “misleading” statements.

Specifically, anonymous emails and false claims about Palin were posted all over the internet and that came from the Obama campaign team!  In the Wall Street Journal in September 2008 published said the Obama camp sent a team to Alaska to dig into her record and background basically again an concerted effort for digging dirt.

To refresh everyone’s memory the Obama campaign WAS successful in 2008 because the internet and social media were heavily used for the first time ever in history for elections and by the time McCain’s team caught on it was too late and they were driving the narrative and were able to drown out concerning details about Obama such as his long stay in Pakistan, his ties to Radical Muslim groups and his background that did not add up from citizenship to career.

China hacking is not something new. Actually, it’s something that is over a decade old and simply being recycled and the Counterintelligence Division of the FBI , specifically FBI agent Kellie O’Brien has been hard at work to make it a reality. As previously reported CIA Chinese operatives and other State Department employees have been arrested. In the article HERE it is inferred some may have been framed attempting to blow the top off the whole operation while others were framed to make it even more legit.  Specifically referencing to the case of Claiborne.

  “They were looking for positions on China, surprises that might be rolled out by campaigns against China,” Dennis Blair, Obama’s director of national intelligence in 2009 and 2010, told NBC.

They were looking for positions on China. We know that in the 2016 elections, positions about China from the Trump camp were VERY clear but in respects to Hillary Clinton’s camp. Clinton on her own made it clear when she state to bankers that she has two faces a public one and a private one.  This is widely known.

One thing the people of the United States must remain firm on is that if China was always behind this that would mean that they invented the whole Russia collusion narrative which is very embarrassing.

But many of us can see past the smoke and mirrors and recognize that timing is everything and the release of China being the culprit now that the Russia narrative has more holes than a colander on the eve of sentencing of George Papadopoulos and General Flynn makes the case that this narrative is Plan B. Why?

If you have the time to read through the affidavit of Agent Kellie O’Brien about Ms. Claiborne it will be more evident.  It is at this point that the Trump administration interview and validate the information manufactured by the “CounterIntelligence Division” of the FBI that Peter Strzok was head of. Specifically, please look at paragraph 212 (Here is the affidavit) and look at the date of this “entrapment” that helped the “FBI” make a case for her arrest as set forth in this article BLP published on August 3, 2018.  Besides, even CNN was forced to report that the Chinese hacked the the FDIC in 2016 and covered it up. Why? Plan B.

Still not convinced this is just a simply new narrative they are pushing?  It is not being contested that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and or that the US government was hacked by the Chinese during the 2016 elections. After all, it was reported constantly throughout the past 18 years that every single administration was being hacked by China so that they gather intel on the US in respects to their operations and activities that had anything to do with China. As in the case of Ms. Claiborne, she would provide information that was unclassified but not widely known in exchange for money which if true is compromising, how can you prove classified information wasn’t provided?  It’s the same as FBI agents “leaking” actual classified information to the press for gifts it’s no different.  Regardless, though, the DNC email hack was NOT China.  It has already been reported and cyber forensics conducted on the files WikiLeaks distributed indicate that an actual jump drive was used directly.  That means a USB drive was inserted to a DNC connected computer and files were copied.

Whatever the deep state is selling, we shouldn’t be buying. We have evidence that the actual “leaker” is no longer with us in what can be considered one of the biggest murder cover ups ever. One murder tons of CCTV footage and no criminal to arrest?  The math doesn’t make sense.  Bottom line, did China hack the US government and Clinton campaign servers more than likely, but did they provide the files to WikiLeaks? No. Did Hillary Clinton “sell” intelligence to China? Very plausible, but in no way is the DNC server hack Chinese, it’s 100 % American because Wikileaks said so and they have NEVER falsely provided information ever since they began operations. Besides, Dana Rohrabacher met with Assange so the administration already knows the answer of who gave them what.

“When you surround an army, leave an outlet free. Do not press a desperate foe too hard.”
Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Big League National Security

Will Josh Hawley be the Next Champion for an America First Foreign Policy?

America First May Have its Next Leader to End Wars Abroad

Published

on

Does America First have a new non-interventionist champion?

Missouri Senator Josh Hawley has been viewed by many as one of the figures who could potentially lead a Trumpist movement after Trump, should Joe Biden end up being installed as president on January 2021.

Hawley has made a name for himself as a champion of Middle America and questioning the neoliberal orthodoxy on immigration and trade. Lately, Hawley has made a pivot towards  questioning the interventionist conventional wisdom on foreign policy. 

In early October of this year, the Missouri Senator called for the American government to withdraw troops from Afghanistan. Hawley tweeted, “Almost 20 years now in Afghanistan. Long past time to draw this war to an end.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Hawley’s foreign policy has been a work progress over the past two years. During a 2019 speech Hawley gave at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), he questioned the nation-building policy prescriptions of previous administrations, demonstrating some degree of skepticism towards non-stop interventionism abroad on the part of the Senator.

That said, it remains to be seen if Hawley’s legislative record will fully match his rhetoric.

Hawley is a staunch China hawk, who fears the rise of China and is a strong voice against China’s expansionist efforts. Hawley’s track record shows that his foreign policy views are rough around the edges. Daniel Larison of The American Conservative is not as optimistic about Hawley judging by his votes on the Yemeni Civil War. Larison cited several of Hawley’s votes that may be cause for concern:

Sen. Hawley voted against the Senate’s resolution of disapproval that opposed the president’s effort to circumvent Congress with a bogus “emergency” to expedite arms sales to Saudi Arabia and the UAE. More important, he voted with the president and most Senate Republicans against the antiwar Yemen resolution that would have cut off all U.S. support to the Saudi coalition.”

Nevertheless, Hawley’s comments on Afghanistan are a good sign that Hawley is catching on to the fact that Americans are tired of foreign wars. Politicians can change their views and behaviors. Hawley is likely recognizing that the America First movement is exhausted by the endless wars and wants candidates and elected officials who offer withdrawal plans. 

After looking at the list of people who have been tapped to join the Biden administration, Hawley tweeted, “What a group of corporatists and war enthusiasts – and #BigTech sellouts.”

Journalist Glenn Greenwald, a fierce interventionist skeptic, maintained cautious optimism about Hawley. In a tweet, he commented, “All kinds of reasons to be skeptical of the authenticity here, but — purely as a matter of rhetoric — just imagine any national Republican speaking this way about a Dem administration even 10 years ago. The framework of politics is radically shifting.”

The jury is still out on Hawley. Regardless of flaws in his voting record, America First advocates should continue to push him and other America First leaning Republicans in the right direction. We should never forget that politicians are still receptive to political pressure and the grassroots holds the keys to political change. 

Young senators like Hawley are the future of American politics and it makes sense for foreign policy restrainers to lobby them and push them in a direction that favors non-interventionism.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending